Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Drug Utilization of Boceprevir and Clinical Management of Health Outcomes of Interest in Chronic Hepatitis C Participants (P08518)

28. juli 2016 opdateret af: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

An Observational Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) of Victrelis™ (Boceprevir) Among Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

This is an observational prospective follow-up study to assess the utilization of boceprevir and the management of pre-specified health outcomes of interest (HOIs) under conditions of routine clinical care in participants with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1.

As an observational prospective study, this study is not intended to change the participant/physician relationship, nor influence the physician's drug prescription or therapeutic management of the participant. No individual administration of any therapeutic or prophylactic agent is assigned in this protocol, and there are no procedures required as part of this protocol. Physician choice of the drug used to treat the participant is based on clinical judgment alone.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

713

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Adults 18 years or older with CHC genotype 1

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype-1 infection
  • Untreated or failed previous therapy
  • Initiated a new treatment regimen after the study implementation date at their site
  • Agrees to participate in the study by giving written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking part in a clinical trial or in any study where a participant is receiving care outside of normal clinical practice for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: Kohorte
  • Tidsperspektiver: Fremadrettet

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Boceprevir + PR
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed boceprevir plus PR as routine clinical management.
Telaprevir + PR
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed telaprevir plus PR as routine clinical management.
PR Alone
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed PR alone as routine clinical management.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Percentage of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone (Drug Utilization Pattern)
Tidsramme: Up to 37 months
The percentage of CHC participants initiating boceprevir plus PR treatment, telaprevir plus PR treatment, or PR treatment alone was determined from a Drug Utilization questionnaire that was administered to physicians using an electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) to collect site level information and reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 37 months
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Weight
Tidsramme: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean weight (standard deviation [SD]) in kilograms (Kg) was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Height
Tidsramme: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean height (SD) in centimeters (cm) was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Body Mass Index (BMI)
Tidsramme: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean body mass index (SD) in Kg/m^2 was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype
Tidsramme: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline HCV genotype was recorded from the eCRF and the number of participants who were 1a genotype, 1b genotype, or unknown/other was reported.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Viral Load
Tidsramme: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Participant baseline HCV viral load was recorded from the eCRF and categorized as either "Low" (<800,000 IU/mL or <2,000,000 RNA copies/mL) or "High" (≥800,000 IU/mL or ≥2,000,000 RNA copies/mL).
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Grade for Child-Pugh Score
Tidsramme: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
The Child-Pugh Score is used to determine the prognosis of chronic liver disease, in particular cirrhosis. It is classified into Classes A (best prognosis) to C (worst prognosis). Child-Pugh scores assessed within 3 months before CHC treatment regimen initiation were recorded from the eCRF, and the number of participants who were Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, not assessed, or unknown whether assessed were reported.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Percentage of Anemia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL) was considered a Health Outcome of Interest (HOI) for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of anemia in participants could include erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA), blood transfusion, drug dose reduction, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of anemia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Anemia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Anemia Episodes
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of anemia in participants could include erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA), blood transfusion (BT), other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). Interventions could be used in combination (e.g. ESA plus blood transfusion) and more than one treatment modification could have been performed. For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of anemia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed anemia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. anemia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Grade 3/4 neutropenia (Grade 3: neutrophil count 0.5 - <0.75 × 10^9/L, Grade 4: <0.5 × 10^9/L) was considered a HOI for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 neutropenia in participants could include Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 neutropenia in participants could include Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use, other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). More than one treatment modification could have been performed. For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (Grade 3: platelet count 25 - <50 × 10^9/L, Grade 4: <25 × 10^9/L) was considered a HOI for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in participants could include thrombopoietin, platelet transfusion, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in participants could include thrombopoietin (TPO), platelet transfusion (PT), other treatment (OT) , and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Serious Rash Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Serious rash was considered a HOI for this study and included rash > 50% of body surface area, rash associated with significant systemic symptoms, or rash resulting in hospitalization or urgent care visit. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of serious rash in participants could include topical corticosteroid use, intravenous (IV) and/or oral corticosteroids, emollients/moisturizers, antihistamines, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of serious rash episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Serious Rash Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of serious rash in participants could include topical corticosteroid (TC), intravenous (IV) and/or oral (PO) corticosteroids (IV/PO CS), emollients/moisturizers (E/M), antihistamines (AH), other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of serious rash episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed serious rash episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. serious rash episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Incidence of Anemia, Grade 3/4 Neutropenia, Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia, and Serious Skin Rash
Tidsramme: Up to 48 weeks of treatment
The incidence (events per 1000 participant-days) of the protocol-defined HOIs (anemia, grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and serious skin rash) was calculated over the 48-week period following the start of CHC treatment exposure. All protocol-defined HOIs were taken into account (serious and non-serious HOIs). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The incidence per 1000 participant-days of anemia, grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and serious skin rash were reported by CHC treatment group of exposure with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of treatment

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. maj 2012

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. juli 2015

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. juli 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

2. februar 2012

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

28. februar 2012

Først opslået (Skøn)

6. marts 2012

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

16. september 2016

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

28. juli 2016

Sidst verificeret

1. juli 2016

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • P08518
  • EP08043.001 (Anden identifikator: Merck Epidemiology Number)
  • SCH 503034 P08518 (Anden identifikator: Schering Protocol Number)
  • MK-3034-072 (Anden identifikator: Merck Protocol Number)

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Hepatitis C kronisk

3
Abonner