Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of ACB Versus ACB Combined With BiFeS Block in Meniscopathy Surgery

27. maj 2026 opdateret af: Atakan Sezgi, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Combined With BiFeS (Biceps Femoris Short Head) Block in Meniscopathy Surgery

Meniscopathy surgeries are commonly associated with moderate postoperative pain, particularly during early mobilization and rehabilitation. Inadequate postoperative analgesia may negatively affect functional recovery, delay ambulation, increase opioid consumption, and contribute to opioid-related adverse effects. Therefore, effective multimodal analgesic strategies are of considerable importance in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee procedures.

Adductor canal block (ACB) is a widely used regional anesthesia technique that provides effective analgesia while largely preserving quadriceps muscle strength. However, its limited effect on posterior knee capsule innervation may result in insufficient control of posterior knee pain. Recently, the biceps femoris short head (BiFeS) block has been described as a novel motor-sparing fascial plane block targeting the posterolateral knee capsule and may provide additional analgesic benefit when combined with ACB.

In this study, it was aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block alone and adductor canal block combined with BiFeS block in patients undergoing surgery for meniscopathy.

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

135

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-II-III
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18-30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 and over 65 years of age
  • ASA score IV and above
  • Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis
  • BMI below 18 or above 30 kg/m2

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Adductor Canal Block Group
After the linear ultrasound probe is placed transversely over the mid-thigh on the side of surgery, the sartorius muscle, femoral artery, vastus medialis muscle, and adductor canal will be identified. The probe will be adjusted to obtain an optimal short-axis view of the femoral artery beneath the sartorius muscle. A block needle will then be advanced using an in-plane technique toward the adductor canal. After negative aspiration, 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the fascial plane adjacent to the femoral artery within the adductor canal. Proper spread of the local anesthetic around the femoral artery and beneath the sartorius muscle will be confirmed by ultrasound imaging.

Adductor canal block will be performed on the patients using 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance.

Additionally, in the postoperative period a paracetamol dose of 1 g every 8 hours and a dexketoprofen dose of 50 mg twice daily were administered iv for multimodal analgesia.

Aktiv komparator: Adductor Canal Block + BiFeS (Biceps Femoris Short Head) Block Group
First, 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the adductor canal, and proper spread of the local anesthetic around the femoral artery and beneath the sartorius muscle will be confirmed by ultrasound imaging. Subsequently, the biceps femoris short head block will be performed under ultrasound guidance on the same side. The ultrasound probe will be positioned to identify the short head of the biceps femoris muscle and the lateral femoral cortex at the distal thigh/supracondylar region. A block needle will be advanced using an in-plane technique toward the fascial plane between the short head of the biceps femoris muscle and the lateral femoral cortex. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into this plane. Adequate spread of the local anesthetic along the interface between the biceps femoris short head and the femur will be confirmed by ultrasound imaging.

In the adductor canal block + BiFeS block group, adductor canal block will be performed using 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by BiFeS block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance, with a total local anesthetic volume of 30 ml.

Additionally, in the postoperative period a paracetamol dose of 1 g every 8 hours and a dexketoprofen dose of 50 mg twice daily were administered iv for multimodal analgesia.

Aktiv komparator: Control Group
Participants in the control group will not receive any regional block intervention.
In the postoperative period a paracetamol dose of 1 g every 8 hours and a dexketoprofen dose of 50 mg twice daily were administered iv for multimodal analgesia.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain Scores
Tidsramme: On the operation day
Pain will be assessed at rest and while coughing using the visual analog scale on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). Pain assessment will be done at 0st, 1st, 2nd,4th, 12th, and 24th hours after surgery.
On the operation day

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Total Postoperative Morphine Consumption During the First 24 Hours After Surgery
Tidsramme: On the operation day
Total Postoperative Morphine Consumption During the First 24 Hours After Surgery
On the operation day

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

27. maj 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

7. maj 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

21. maj 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

18. maj 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

18. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

22. maj 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

29. maj 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

27. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Smertebehandling

Kliniske forsøg med Adductor Canal Block Group

Abonner