Schutz vor Fehlinformationen über HIV-Impfstoffe bei heranwachsenden Mädchen und jungen Frauen in Südafrika (PROTECT)
7. August 2026 aktualisiert von: University of Pennsylvania
Heranwachsende Mädchen und junge Frauen (AGYW) im Alter zwischen 15 und 24 Jahren tragen in Südafrika weiterhin die Hauptlast der Infektionen mit dem Humanen Immundefizienzvirus (HIV), obwohl bei den Präventions- und Behandlungsprogrammen Fortschritte zu verzeichnen sind.
Die anhaltende Anfälligkeit junger Frauen für eine HIV-Infektion und die nicht optimale Nutzung hochwirksamer Präventionsoptionen wie der Präexpositionsprophylaxe (PrEP) machen einen HIV-Impfstoff erforderlich, der Bevölkerungsgruppen mit einem erheblichen Risiko einer HIV-Infektion zugute kommt.
Die Lehren aus früheren Impfstoffstudien und dem jüngsten COVID-19-Impfstoff haben jedoch erhebliche Hindernisse für die Einführung von Impfstoffen aufgezeigt, wie etwa weit verbreitete Fehlinformationen und Impfzögerlichkeit.
Diese Herausforderungen gefährden die erfolgreiche Umsetzung eines zukünftigen HIV-Impfstoffs.
Aufbauend auf diesen Erkenntnissen wird diese Studie die psychologische Impftheorie nutzen, um HIV-Impfbotschaften bei heranwachsenden Mädchen und jungen Frauen zu entwickeln und zu bewerten.
Hauptziel: Vergleich der Veränderungen in der Absicht, eine HIV-Impfung zu erhalten, nachdem Fehlinformationen in Gruppen mit und ohne psychologische Impfung und verhaltensökonomischer Verstärkung aufgetreten sind.
Sekundäre Ziele: (1) Vergleich der Glaubwürdigkeit und Überzeugungskraft von Fehlinformationsbehauptungen und der mit Fehlinformationen verbundenen Motivationsbedrohung in Gruppen mit und ohne psychologische Impfung und verhaltensökonomischem Boost.
(2) Untersuchung von Untergruppeneffekten anhand relevanter soziodemografischer und Verhaltensfaktoren, einschließlich HIV-Risiko, PrEP-Anamnese, COVID-19-Impfanamnese, allgemeiner Impfskepsis und Informationsvermeidung.
Die Forscher werden eine dreiarmige, randomisierte, kontrollierte Studie mit 2-3 Impfmeldungen durchführen, die sich mit aufkommenden Mythen und Fehlinformationen über den HIV-Impfstoff in Südafrika befassen.
Die Teilnehmer werden nach dem Zufallsprinzip einer Kontrollgruppe oder einem von zwei Interventionsarmen zugeordnet: (1) Impfnachrichtenarm oder (2) Impfbotschaft mit Erkenntnissen aus der Verhaltensökonomie erweitern.
Studienübersicht
Status
Aktiv, nicht rekrutierend
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
2163
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
-
Johannesburg, Südafrika
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of the Witwatersrand
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Ja
Beschreibung
Einschlusskriterien:
- Weiblich
- Alter 18-24 Jahre
- Selbstberichtete Vorgeschichte sexueller Aktivitäten in den letzten 12 Monaten
- Selbstberichteter HIV-negativer Status oder unbekannter HIV-Status bei der Einschreibung
- Bereit und in der Lage, eine schriftliche Einverständniserklärung abzugeben
- Kann Englisch lesen und verstehen
Ausschlusskriterien:
- Nicht bereit oder nicht in der Lage, der Studienteilnahme zuzustimmen.
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Verhütung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Doppelt
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Kontrolle
Die Teilnehmer, die in die Kontrollgruppe eingeschrieben sind, erhalten nicht verwandte Informationen zu Diabetes und Ernährungsthemen derselben Länge wie die Inokulationsnachrichten.
In Anhang 6 finden Sie ein Beispiel dafür, wie diese Nachricht strukturiert wird.
Dadurch wird die Kontrollgruppe zu einer Aufmerksamkeitskontrollgruppe und stellt sicher, dass die Ergebnisse durch die Interventionsgruppe, die mehr Zeit und Aufmerksamkeitsressourcen für die Teilnahme an der Studie verbringen, nicht verwechselt werden.
|
Die Teilnehmer, die in die Kontrollgruppe eingeschrieben sind, erhalten nicht verwandte Informationen zu Diabetes und Ernährungsthemen derselben Länge wie die Inokulationsnachrichten.
In Anhang 6 finden Sie ein Beispiel dafür, wie diese Nachricht strukturiert wird.
Dadurch wird die Kontrollgruppe zu einer Aufmerksamkeitskontrollgruppe und stellt sicher, dass die Ergebnisse durch die Interventionsgruppe, die mehr Zeit und Aufmerksamkeitsressourcen für die Teilnahme an der Studie verbringen, nicht verwechselt werden.
|
|
Sonstiges: Verbesserte Inokulationsnachricht
Die Teilnehmer, die in den ARM der erweiterten Inokulationsmeldung eingeschrieben sind, erhalten Nachrichten, die sie vor der bevorstehenden Fehlinformation des HIV -Impfstoffs warnen und erklärt, warum diese Behauptungen falsch oder irreführend sind.
Im Rahmen des Verhaltensökonomie -Schubs können die Teilnehmer ein kleines Token (z. B. Aufkleber, Abzeichen, Armband) mit einer Nachricht erhalten, die die Impfung als Konsequenz- und Verpflichtungspunkt fördert.
|
Die Teilnehmer, die in den ARM der erweiterten Inokulationsmeldung eingeschrieben sind, erhalten Nachrichten, die sie vor der bevorstehenden Fehlinformation des HIV -Impfstoffs warnen und erklärt, warum diese Behauptungen falsch oder irreführend sind.
Im Rahmen des Verhaltensökonomie -Schubs können die Teilnehmer ein kleines Token (z. B. Aufkleber, Abzeichen, Armband) mit einer Nachricht erhalten, die die Impfung als Konsequenz- und Verpflichtungspunkt fördert.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
HIV Vaccine Intention, at the End of the Baseline Assessment
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Intention to get the HIV vaccine, measured after inoculation intervention and misinformation exposure The intention to get the vaccine will be measured on a 0-10 scale.
Higher score means they are more likely to get the HIV vaccine.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
HIV Vaccine Intention, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Intention to get the HIV vaccine, measured at follow-up survey following misinformation exposure and intervention.
Measured on a 0-10 scale.
Higher score means they are more likely to get the HIV vaccine.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Recommend to Friends, at the End of the Baseline Assessment
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Intention to recommend the HIV vaccine to friends, measured at survey baseline following misinformation exposure and intervention.
Measured on a 0-10 scale.
Higher score means they are more likely to recommend the HIV vaccine to a friend.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Recommend to Friends, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Intention to recommend the HIV vaccine to friends, measured at follow-up survey following misinformation exposure and intervention, controlling for baseline pre-intervention/exposure intention.
Measured on a 0-10 scale.
Higher score means they are more likely to recommend the HIV vaccine to a friend.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #1
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #1 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #2
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #2 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #3
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #3 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #4
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #4 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #5
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #5 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #6
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #6 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #1
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #1 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #2
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #2 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #3
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #3 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
TThey were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #4
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #4 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #5
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #5 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #6
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #6 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #1
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #1 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #7
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #7 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #3
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #3 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #4
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #4 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #5
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #5 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #6
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #6 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #1, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #1 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #2, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #2 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #1, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #1 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #2, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #2 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #1, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #1 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #2, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #2 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of New Claims, Exposure #12, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #12 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of New Claims, Exposure #8, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #8 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of New Claims, Exposure #9, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #9 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of New Claims, Exposure #10, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #10 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of New Claims, Exposure #11, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #11 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness o of New Claims, Exposure #12, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #12 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness of New Claims, Claim #8, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #8 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness of New Claims, Exposure #9, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #9 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness of New Claims, Exposure #10, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #10 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness of New Claims, Exposure #11, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #11 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of New Claims, Exposure #12, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #12 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of New Claims, Exposure #8, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #8 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of New Claims, Exposure #9, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #9 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of New Claims, Exposure #10, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #10 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of New Claims, Exposure #11, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #11 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Credibility of Inoculated Exposure #7
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #7 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Anxiousness of Inoculated Exposure #7
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #7 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Shareability of Inoculated Exposure #2
Zeitfenster: At the end of the baseline assessment
|
Extent to which claim #2 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were provided information on this claim and how to recognize it as misinformation.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
At the end of the baseline assessment
|
|
Credibility of New Claims, Exposure #13, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #13 made the participants believe the credibility of the information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to believe the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Anxiousness of New Claims, Exposure #13, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #13 made the participants anxious or nervous about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number indicates more self-reported anxiousness.
|
2-4 weeks
|
|
Shareability of New Claims, Exposure #13, Follow-up
Zeitfenster: 2-4 weeks
|
Extent to which claim #13 made the participants more likely to share information about the HIV vaccine.
They were not provided prior information on this claim.
The scale is measured on 1-7.
Higher number means they are more likely to share the claim.
|
2-4 weeks
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
24. Juli 2025
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
16. Oktober 2025
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
1. Juni 2027
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
7. November 2024
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
18. November 2024
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
22. November 2024
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
28. August 2026
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
7. August 2026
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. August 2026
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 1R01MH132401 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
UNENTSCHIEDEN
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
Die Ermittler legen immer noch den Datenaustauschplan fest und ob wir IPD schon weitergeben werden
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .