Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Sodium Thiosulfate for the Treatment of Pain Associated With Calcific Uremic Arteriolopath

January 19, 2017 updated by: American Regent, Inc.

Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Sodium Thiosulfate for the Treatment of Pain Associated With Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy Followed by a Single Armed Extension Phase to Prospectively Observe Lesion Progression in the Presence of Sodium Thiosulfate Treatment

To evaluate the efficacy of Sodium Thiosulfate (STS) compared to placebo, in reducing analgesic requirement in subjects with calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) during an initial 28-day treatment phase.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Efficacy of Sodium Thiosulfate (STS) compared to placebo, in reducing analgesic requirement in subjects with calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) during an initial 28-day treatment phase.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35805
        • Nephrology Consultants
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46804
        • Nephrology Association of Northern Indiana
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18017
        • A.A. Northeast Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females ≥18 years of age who are able to give informed consent.
  2. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA), either newly-diagnosed or pre-existing, currently on STS or not yet treated with STS and either not on pain medication or on a stable pain medication regimen. The diagnosis of calciphylaxis can be made when:

    • The following clinical features are all present, or two (2) of the following clinical features and typical histopathological findings are present.

Clinical features:

  1. A patient on chronic hemodialysis for chronic kidney disease or with a GFR of less than 15/ml/min/1.73 m2
  2. More than 2 painful and non-treatable skin ulcers with concomitant painful purpura
  3. Painful and non-treatable skin ulcers on the trunk, extremities, or penis with concomitant painful purpura

Histopathological findings by skin biopsy when 3 clinical findings are not present:

  1. Necrosis and ulceration of the skin with calcification of the tunica media and internal elastic membrane of small to medium-sized arterioles of dermis and subcutaneous fat are essential for the diagnosis
  2. Concentric stenosis due to edematous intimal thickening is also seen in the small to medium-sized arterioles of dermis and subcutaneous fat
  3. End stage renal disease (ESRD) on chronic maintenance hemodialysis.
  4. Willingness to undergo washout of pre-existing STS treatment (if required by treatment allocation) and to continue in a double blind treatment period of 4 weeks, during which they might receive placebo.
  5. Ability to comply with all study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of allergic or other adverse reaction to STS
  2. Current treatment with STS for indications other than CUA (e.g. cyanide poisoning)
  3. Currently on alternative treatment for CUA as listed below. Unless treatment has been discontinued for at least 1 month prior to the screening visit.

    1. Steroids
    2. Hyperbaric Oxygen
    3. Bisphosphonates
    4. Pentoxifylline
    5. Tissue Plasminogen Activator
    6. Luciliar sericata larvae (maggot therapy)
    7. On Cinacalcet for treatment for CUA (i.e. cinacalcet was either started or dose increased after the appearance of lesions)
  4. Any co-existing disease or problem that makes participation in the study unadvisable for the patient or compromises integrity of the study

    1. Cirrhosis of the liver
    2. History of congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) with multiple hospital admissions (at least 3 admissions in 6 months)
    3. Persistent and uncontrolled metabolic acidosis
  5. Chronic kidney disease or renal transplant patients with diagnosis of calciphylaxis who are not on hemodialysis.
  6. Any other disease or condition which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would place a subject at undue risk by being enrolled in the trial, or cause inability to comply with the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sodium Thiosulfate
Sodium Thiosulfate at 25g in 100 ml normal sterile saline (NSS)
Additional treatment(s) due to lesion progression When intervention occurs, the date of the intervening event should be recorded in the source documents and the (CRF). The subject should continue in the study as scheduled.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
similarly-formulated placebo in 100 ml NSS
Additional treatment(s) due to lesion progression When intervention occurs, the date of the intervening event should be recorded in the source documents and the (CRF). The subject should continue in the study as scheduled.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in Analgesic Requirement
Time Frame: up to 28 Days
The length of time in days, from first treatment with blinded study drug; to when subject requires rescue analgesic
up to 28 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Linda Mundy, MD, PhD, American Regent, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 30, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Calciphylaxis

Clinical Trials on Sodium thiosulfate

3
Subscribe