Using Behavioral Economics to Enhance Appointment Reminders and Reduce Missed Visits (No Show)

October 13, 2023 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

"No-shows," or missed visits are a persistent problem in all health care systems. They contribute to worsened patient access, longer wait times, and inefficient use limited health care resources. The VA's no-show rate has shown no improvement in years, resulting in a staggering 9 million ambulatory no-shows in Fiscal Year (FY) 2015. Appointment reminders are an essential and proven element to addressing no-shows but major research gaps exist. Behavioral economics (BE) and allied fields offer key insights that are relevant to developing innovation in the field of appointment reminders. Adding "nudges" informed by concepts such as social norms, behavioral intentions, clear instructions, and potential negative consequences to the Veteran and others is a novel but evidence-based way to create enhanced appointment reminders. Seemingly small changes to appointment letters can create measurable shifts in appointment attendance and no-shows. Even more, these behavioral nudges can produce large benefits when taken to scale and compounded across a population.

This project will address several aims, including: developing BE-informed messages to incorporate into enhanced appointment reminders; evaluating the effect of several versions of enhanced appointment reminders; and identifying potential barriers and facilitators to widespread implementation of enhanced appointment reminder messages.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives: The overarching objective of this proposal is to test the effectiveness of simple and scalable enhancements to appointment reminders in reducing no-shows, and prepare for larger-scale implementation.

Plan: "No-shows," or missed visits are a persistent problem in all health care systems. They contribute to worsened patient access, longer wait times, and inefficient use limited health care resources. The VA's no-show rate has shown no improvement in years, resulting in a staggering 9 million ambulatory no-shows in FY2015. Appointment reminders are an essential and proven element to addressing no-shows but major research gaps exist. Behavioral economics (BE) and allied fields offer key insights that are relevant to developing innovation in the field of appointment reminders. Adding "nudges" informed by concepts such as social norms, behavioral intentions, clear instructions, and potential negative consequences to the Veteran and others is a novel but evidence-based way to create enhanced appointment reminders. Seemingly small changes to appointment letters can create measurable shifts in appointment attendance and no-shows. Even more, these behavioral nudges can produce large benefits when taken to scale and compounded across a population.

The investigators will address the following aims:

  1. Aim 1: Develop and iteratively refine BE-informed messages based on Veterans' perceptions, and incorporate them into enhanced appointment reminders.
  2. Aim 2: Determine the effect of four versions of enhanced appointment reminders on measures relevant to treatment access, compared with usual reminders.
  3. Aim 3: Evaluate differences in treatment effect associated with four versions of enhanced appointment reminders.
  4. Aim 4: Characterize potential barriers and facilitators to widespread implementation of enhanced appointment reminder messages.

Methods: The investigators will first determine the validity of a series of draft messages, which are informed by concepts and principles from BE, psychology, and related fields and will be included in the intervention; the investigators will also explore potential mechanisms of action, and measure any harms by assessing Veterans' perceptions of the messages (Aim 1). After intervention refinement, the investigators will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial to test 4 interventions, consisting of variations in nudges included in appointment letters, and compare them to usual appointment letters (Aims 2 and 3). The trial will be conducted at VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS) in primary care and mental health clinics. The investigators will evaluate changes in no-show rates, attendance and cancellation rates and appointment wait times. Finally, the investigators will conduct a qualitative assessment with key informants to inform potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of revised appointment reminders (Aim 4).

Relevance to VA's Mission: This proposal directly addresses two of the six Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D) priority areas: access and mental and behavioral health. First, reducing no-shows is likely to improve efficiency of access to care and reduce wait time. Second, this proposal includes a focus on interventions in mental health settings, which have especially high no-show rates and may have more potential for improvement.

Medical Subject Heading Terms: Economics, Behavioral; Mental Health; Healthcare Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34516

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects will be a minimum of 18 years old.
  • All subjects will be patients with scheduled outpatient appointments (either primary care or mental health) in the VA Portland Health Care System.
  • Race and ethnicity will not be used in determining inclusion or exclusion of subjects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Social Norms + Behavioral Instructions
Clinics assigned a letter with two types of nudges (Social Norms + Behavioral Instructions)
A letter with two types of nudges. One points out the common behavior of attending appointments. And one provides clear, specific instructions for making appointment changes. The appointment reminder also includes usual care (basic appointment information on date, location, and phone number(s) for scheduling changes).
Experimental: Caring + Consequences for Others + Behavioral Instructions
Clinics assigned a letter with three types of nudges (Caring + Consequences for Others + Behavioral Instructions)
A letter with three types of nudges. One suggests that the institution cares about the patient. One highlights a potential negative consequence for others if the patient no-shows. And one provides clear, specific instructions for making appointment changes. The appointment reminder also includes usual care (basic appointment information on date, location, and phone number(s) for scheduling changes).
Experimental: Caring + Consequences for Self + Behavioral Instructions
Clinics assigned a letter with three types of nudges (Caring + Consequences for Self + Behavioral Instructions)
A letter with three types of nudges. One suggests that the institution cares about the patients. One highlights potential negative consequences for the patient if s/he no-shows. And one provides clear, specific instructions for making appointment changes. The appointment reminder also includes usual care (basic appointment information on date, location, and phone number(s) for scheduling changes).
Experimental: Combination of all Nudges
Clinics assigned a letter with a combination of all types of nudges (Behavioral: Caring + Consequences for Others + Consequences for Self + Social Norms + Behavioral Instructions)
A letter with all types of nudges combined. One suggests that the institution cares about the patients. One highlights a potential negative consequence for others if the patient no-shows. One highlights potential negative consequences for the patient if s/he no-shows. One points out the common behavior of attending appointments. And one provides clear, specific instructions for making appointment changes. The appointment reminder also includes usual care (basic appointment information on date, location, and phone number(s) for scheduling changes).
No Intervention: Usual Care
Clinics assigned to usual care. Usual care consisted of a letter with basic appointment information on date, location, and phone number(s) for scheduling changes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
No-Show Rate
Time Frame: 1 year
The percentage of total appointments that are classified as a no-show, relative to the total number of appointments scheduled. The numerator ("no-shows") consists of appointments marked as a no-show and appointments canceled by the patient or clinic after the appointment time. The denominator ("total appointments") consists of no-shows and completed appointments. For calculation of missed appointments, canceled appointments are not included in the number of units analyzed. The numerator is multiplied by 100 to arrive at a percentage.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cancellation Rate
Time Frame: 1 year
The percentage of scheduled appointments that are marked as canceled.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alan R. Teo, MD MS, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 17-134
  • HX002449 (Other Grant/Funding Number: VA Health Services Research and Development)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Appointment Reminders

Clinical Trials on Social Norms + Behavioral Instructions

3
Subscribe