Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Stepping up to Health - for Veterans With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

28 de abril de 2016 actualizado por: VA Office of Research and Development

Effectiveness of an Automated Walking Program Targeting Veterans With COPD

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of an internet-mediated pedometer based intervention that is designed to increase walking and improve function among veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Specific Aims are: 1) to test the effectiveness of an automated internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD with a primary outcome of improvement in health-related quality of life at four-months and at one year in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a wait list control. 2) to estimate the effect of internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD on all cause days of hospitalization over one year following randomization. 3) to compare intervention reach, participation and satisfaction outcomes between rural and urban veterans among those randomized to the intervention arm. The long-term objective of this research is to develop, evaluate and disseminate effective, low-cost interventions that improve quality of life for veterans, particularly rural veterans, managing complex chronic conditions.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Background:

Low levels of physical activity are common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a sedentary lifestyle is associated with poor outcomes including increased mortality, frequent hospitalizations, and poor health-related quality of life. Individuals with COPD who undergo a facility-based, exercise-focused pulmonary rehabilitation program experience significant improvements in health related quality of life, dyspnea, and exercise tolerance as well as reduced rates of hospitalization. Unfortunately, only a small percent of individuals with COPD who could benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation have access to and participate in such programs. Moreover, the benefits of short-term pulmonary rehabilitation programs tend to diminish rapidly after the program ends. Rural veterans are less likely to have access to facility-based pulmonary rehabilitation than urban veterans. Health related quality of life in rural veterans with COPD is significantly worse than for veterans with COPD who live in urban areas.

Objectives:

The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an Internet-mediated, pedometer-based intervention designed to increase walking and health related quality of life for Veterans with COPD. The specific aims of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a wait list control were: 1) To test the effectiveness of an automated internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD with a primary outcome of improvement in health related quality of life at four months and at one year; 2) to estimate the effect of the internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD on all cause days of hospitalization over one year following randomization; and 3) to compare intervention reach, participation and satisfaction outcomes between rural and urban veterans among those randomized to the intervention arm.

Methods:

Participants were followed for 12 months to investigate the efficacy of the intervention in assisting patients with initiating and maintaining a regular walking program and improving health related quality of life. Eligible and consented patients wore a pedometer to obtain one week of baseline data and then were randomized on a 2:1 ratio to Taking Healthy Steps or to a wait list control. The intervention arm received iterative step-count feedback; individualized step-count goals, motivational and informational messages, and access to an online community. Wait list controls were notified that they were enrolled, but that their intervention would start in one year; however, they kept the pedometer and had access to a static webpage. Both groups completed on-line survey assessments at baseline, 4, and 12 months, and were asked to report adverse events on a regular basis. The primary outcome was changes in health related quality of life, as measured using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), a disease-specific instrument in patients with COPD. Secondary outcomes included days of hospitalization during the one-year intervention period, changes in average daily steps as measured using the study pedometer, self-reported dyspnea, intervention reach, and adverse event rates. The analysis was conducted based [on the original randomized treatment assignment regardless of participation (an intent-to-treat analysis) and included both a complete case analysis as well as an all case analysis using a linear mixed-effects model. Between-group differences in change scores (4 months or 12 months) were estimated after adjusting for baseline values of the outcome variables.

Status:

This study is completed. Data analysis and manuscript preparation continue.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

307

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48113-0170
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

40 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult >= 40 years old
  • Diagnosis of COPD, emphysema or chronic bronchitis
  • Able to walk a minimum of one block
  • Sedentary, defined by less than 150 minutes of self-reported physical activity per week
  • Have a doctor or primary care provider in the VA who can provide medical clearance
  • Competent to give informed consent
  • Must be a regular email user (check weekly)
  • Have access to a computer with an internet connection, a USB port, and Windows XP or Vista

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis codes of quadriplegia and paraplegia or pregnancy-related diagnoses or procedures within the previous year will be excluded from potential participant pool

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Otro: Usual Care
Control group, instructed to wear the pedometer but not provided with walking goals or instruction.
Control group, instructed to wear the pedometer but not provided with walking goals or instruction.
Otro: Internet-mediated Walking Program

participants in the intervention arm are asked to participate in a walking program

automated internet-mediated walking program: intervention participants are encouraged to walk daily to their step-count goal while wearing a pedometer provided by the study that will measure their daily step-counts. They are also encouraged to log into their personally tailored website to upload their step counts and obtain other information about the study and progress

intervention participants are encouraged to walk daily to their step-count goal while wearing a pedometer provided by the study that will measure their daily step-counts. They are also encouraged to log into their personally tailored website to upload their step counts and obtain other information about the study and progress

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Self-Reported Respiratory-Specific Quality of Life
Periodo de tiempo: four months from randomization
Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score from Baseline to four months. (Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.)
four months from randomization
Self-Reported Respiratory-Specific Quality of Life
Periodo de tiempo: twelve months from randomization
Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score from Baseline to twelve months. (Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.)
twelve months from randomization

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Self Reported Dyspnea
Periodo de tiempo: four months from randomization
Change in Self Reported Dyspnea from Baseline to 4 months. (Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more shortness of breath. For example, "0 - I only get breathless with strenuous exercise." and "4 - I am too breathless to leave the house or I am breathless when dressing.")
four months from randomization
Self Reported Dyspnea
Periodo de tiempo: twelve months from randomization
Change in Self Reported Dyspnea from Baseline to 12 months. (Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more shortness of breath. For example, "0 - I only get breathless with strenuous exercise." and "4 - I am too breathless to leave the house or I am breathless when dressing.")
twelve months from randomization
Days of Hospitalization
Periodo de tiempo: during study participation, up to 12 months
Number of days of all-cause hospitalization during study participation.
during study participation, up to 12 months
Change in Average Daily Step Counts
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and final two weeks of the intervention and the two weeks post intervention.
Change in daily step counts compared to baseline and those captured in the final two weeks of the intervention and the two weeks post intervention.
baseline and final two weeks of the intervention and the two weeks post intervention.
Goal Commitment for Intervention Participants
Periodo de tiempo: change from four months and twelve months from enrollment
Change in goal commitment for intervention participations on a Likert scale from 1-5, with 1 as "Strongly Disagree" and 5 is "Strongly Agree" to the question, "I am strongly committed to pursuing my step count goal." A negative change value indicates lower goal commitment.
change from four months and twelve months from enrollment
Study Reach Among Rural Participants
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline
Calculated by dividing the total number of eligible rural responders by the total number of rural responders to create an eligibility rate, then multiplying the eligibility rate with the total number of letters sent to rural individuals to create a possible rural eligible pool. The total number of eligible rural responders was divided by the possible rural eligible pool.
At baseline
Participant Retention
Periodo de tiempo: during study participation, up to twelve months
The last valid day of pedometer data or the last login day to the study website for both arms, whichever day was last, from 1-366.
during study participation, up to twelve months
Change in Participant Satisfaction
Periodo de tiempo: four to twelve months of study participation
Change in participation satisfaction with the Intervention group from four to twelve months on a Likert scale of 1-5, where 1 is "Definitely True" 5 is "Definitely False" to the question, "I would recommend the Taking Healthy Steps walking program to another person with COPD". A negative change value indicates higher satisfaction score.
four to twelve months of study participation

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Caroline R Richardson, MD, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de diciembre de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de enero de 2014

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2014

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

9 de abril de 2010

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de abril de 2010

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

13 de abril de 2010

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

7 de junio de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2016

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • IIR 09-366

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Usual Care

3
Suscribir