Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Stepping up to Health - for Veterans With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

28 aprile 2016 aggiornato da: VA Office of Research and Development

Effectiveness of an Automated Walking Program Targeting Veterans With COPD

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of an internet-mediated pedometer based intervention that is designed to increase walking and improve function among veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Specific Aims are: 1) to test the effectiveness of an automated internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD with a primary outcome of improvement in health-related quality of life at four-months and at one year in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a wait list control. 2) to estimate the effect of internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD on all cause days of hospitalization over one year following randomization. 3) to compare intervention reach, participation and satisfaction outcomes between rural and urban veterans among those randomized to the intervention arm. The long-term objective of this research is to develop, evaluate and disseminate effective, low-cost interventions that improve quality of life for veterans, particularly rural veterans, managing complex chronic conditions.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Background:

Low levels of physical activity are common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a sedentary lifestyle is associated with poor outcomes including increased mortality, frequent hospitalizations, and poor health-related quality of life. Individuals with COPD who undergo a facility-based, exercise-focused pulmonary rehabilitation program experience significant improvements in health related quality of life, dyspnea, and exercise tolerance as well as reduced rates of hospitalization. Unfortunately, only a small percent of individuals with COPD who could benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation have access to and participate in such programs. Moreover, the benefits of short-term pulmonary rehabilitation programs tend to diminish rapidly after the program ends. Rural veterans are less likely to have access to facility-based pulmonary rehabilitation than urban veterans. Health related quality of life in rural veterans with COPD is significantly worse than for veterans with COPD who live in urban areas.

Objectives:

The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an Internet-mediated, pedometer-based intervention designed to increase walking and health related quality of life for Veterans with COPD. The specific aims of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a wait list control were: 1) To test the effectiveness of an automated internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD with a primary outcome of improvement in health related quality of life at four months and at one year; 2) to estimate the effect of the internet-mediated walking program for veterans with COPD on all cause days of hospitalization over one year following randomization; and 3) to compare intervention reach, participation and satisfaction outcomes between rural and urban veterans among those randomized to the intervention arm.

Methods:

Participants were followed for 12 months to investigate the efficacy of the intervention in assisting patients with initiating and maintaining a regular walking program and improving health related quality of life. Eligible and consented patients wore a pedometer to obtain one week of baseline data and then were randomized on a 2:1 ratio to Taking Healthy Steps or to a wait list control. The intervention arm received iterative step-count feedback; individualized step-count goals, motivational and informational messages, and access to an online community. Wait list controls were notified that they were enrolled, but that their intervention would start in one year; however, they kept the pedometer and had access to a static webpage. Both groups completed on-line survey assessments at baseline, 4, and 12 months, and were asked to report adverse events on a regular basis. The primary outcome was changes in health related quality of life, as measured using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), a disease-specific instrument in patients with COPD. Secondary outcomes included days of hospitalization during the one-year intervention period, changes in average daily steps as measured using the study pedometer, self-reported dyspnea, intervention reach, and adverse event rates. The analysis was conducted based [on the original randomized treatment assignment regardless of participation (an intent-to-treat analysis) and included both a complete case analysis as well as an all case analysis using a linear mixed-effects model. Between-group differences in change scores (4 months or 12 months) were estimated after adjusting for baseline values of the outcome variables.

Status:

This study is completed. Data analysis and manuscript preparation continue.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

307

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Stati Uniti, 48113-0170
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

40 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult >= 40 years old
  • Diagnosis of COPD, emphysema or chronic bronchitis
  • Able to walk a minimum of one block
  • Sedentary, defined by less than 150 minutes of self-reported physical activity per week
  • Have a doctor or primary care provider in the VA who can provide medical clearance
  • Competent to give informed consent
  • Must be a regular email user (check weekly)
  • Have access to a computer with an internet connection, a USB port, and Windows XP or Vista

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis codes of quadriplegia and paraplegia or pregnancy-related diagnoses or procedures within the previous year will be excluded from potential participant pool

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Altro: Usual Care
Control group, instructed to wear the pedometer but not provided with walking goals or instruction.
Control group, instructed to wear the pedometer but not provided with walking goals or instruction.
Altro: Internet-mediated Walking Program

participants in the intervention arm are asked to participate in a walking program

automated internet-mediated walking program: intervention participants are encouraged to walk daily to their step-count goal while wearing a pedometer provided by the study that will measure their daily step-counts. They are also encouraged to log into their personally tailored website to upload their step counts and obtain other information about the study and progress

intervention participants are encouraged to walk daily to their step-count goal while wearing a pedometer provided by the study that will measure their daily step-counts. They are also encouraged to log into their personally tailored website to upload their step counts and obtain other information about the study and progress

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Self-Reported Respiratory-Specific Quality of Life
Lasso di tempo: four months from randomization
Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score from Baseline to four months. (Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.)
four months from randomization
Self-Reported Respiratory-Specific Quality of Life
Lasso di tempo: twelve months from randomization
Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score from Baseline to twelve months. (Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.)
twelve months from randomization

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Self Reported Dyspnea
Lasso di tempo: four months from randomization
Change in Self Reported Dyspnea from Baseline to 4 months. (Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more shortness of breath. For example, "0 - I only get breathless with strenuous exercise." and "4 - I am too breathless to leave the house or I am breathless when dressing.")
four months from randomization
Self Reported Dyspnea
Lasso di tempo: twelve months from randomization
Change in Self Reported Dyspnea from Baseline to 12 months. (Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more shortness of breath. For example, "0 - I only get breathless with strenuous exercise." and "4 - I am too breathless to leave the house or I am breathless when dressing.")
twelve months from randomization
Days of Hospitalization
Lasso di tempo: during study participation, up to 12 months
Number of days of all-cause hospitalization during study participation.
during study participation, up to 12 months
Change in Average Daily Step Counts
Lasso di tempo: baseline and final two weeks of the intervention and the two weeks post intervention.
Change in daily step counts compared to baseline and those captured in the final two weeks of the intervention and the two weeks post intervention.
baseline and final two weeks of the intervention and the two weeks post intervention.
Goal Commitment for Intervention Participants
Lasso di tempo: change from four months and twelve months from enrollment
Change in goal commitment for intervention participations on a Likert scale from 1-5, with 1 as "Strongly Disagree" and 5 is "Strongly Agree" to the question, "I am strongly committed to pursuing my step count goal." A negative change value indicates lower goal commitment.
change from four months and twelve months from enrollment
Study Reach Among Rural Participants
Lasso di tempo: At baseline
Calculated by dividing the total number of eligible rural responders by the total number of rural responders to create an eligibility rate, then multiplying the eligibility rate with the total number of letters sent to rural individuals to create a possible rural eligible pool. The total number of eligible rural responders was divided by the possible rural eligible pool.
At baseline
Participant Retention
Lasso di tempo: during study participation, up to twelve months
The last valid day of pedometer data or the last login day to the study website for both arms, whichever day was last, from 1-366.
during study participation, up to twelve months
Change in Participant Satisfaction
Lasso di tempo: four to twelve months of study participation
Change in participation satisfaction with the Intervention group from four to twelve months on a Likert scale of 1-5, where 1 is "Definitely True" 5 is "Definitely False" to the question, "I would recommend the Taking Healthy Steps walking program to another person with COPD". A negative change value indicates higher satisfaction score.
four to twelve months of study participation

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Caroline R Richardson, MD, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 dicembre 2011

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 gennaio 2014

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 gennaio 2014

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

9 aprile 2010

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

12 aprile 2010

Primo Inserito (Stima)

13 aprile 2010

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)

7 giugno 2016

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

28 aprile 2016

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2016

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • IIR 09-366

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Usual Care

3
Sottoscrivi