Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Rehabilitation For Acquired Visual Field Defects: Development Of A Bottom-Up Approach (VISIOTRAIN)

25 de julio de 2018 actualizado por: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Cortical Visual Field Defects (CFVD) are common after acquired brain injury. They often cause problems with reading and visual exploration which impact on patients' quality of life. Apart from the substitutive method that uses prisms directly placed on glasses, two main rehabilitative methods have been explored previously: one restorative and one compensatory. The most effective methods seem to be based on compensatory training paradigms that target eye movements. They rely on voluntary mass-practice that induces changes in exploratory saccadic behaviour, particularly into the blind hemifield. Previous studies using this method have shown changes in visual scanning patterns but with only a marginal profit in terms of functional benefit.

In the present study, the investigators developed a new approach to the compensatory visual field training based solely on a bottom-up mechanism. It does not require the patients' ability to voluntarily maintain attention oriented to the affected field, which may be difficult for brain-damaged patients. As previously reported in other pathological contexts (e.g. use of prism adaptation or sensory stimulation in neglect patients), bypassing voluntary and conscious implication of the patient can produce improvements by a more automatic process.

The investigators hypotheses are: 1) that a novel ramp-step search paradigm can be used by hemianopic patients to automatically improve targeted eye movements into their blind visual field; and 2) that this will lead to behavioural improvements on ecologically valid tests of visual search.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

22

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Saint Genis Laval, Francia, 69235
        • Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation,Hôpital Henry Gabrielle

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 80 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male/Female
  • Stroke (ischemia or hemorrhage) documented by CTscan or MRI
  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) documented by CTscan or MRI
  • Right or Left hemianopia defined by perimetry
  • All subjects must be between the ages of 18-80
  • Aetiology of visual field defect : Stroke (ischemia or hemorrhage)
  • Delay post-stroke : at least 6 months
  • Only one lesion on CTscan or MRI (performed in a maximal delay of 6 months)
  • Corrected monocular visual acuity > 5/10
  • Possible understanding of experimental conditions
  • Patient being able to be quiet and sit during at least 2 hours
  • Having given written informed consent prior to any procedure related to the study
  • Availability for the period of the study
  • Covered by a Health System where applicable, and/or in compliance with the recommendations of the national laws in force relating to biomedical research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ophthalmologic criteria : monocular visual acuity < 4/10, strabismus , diplopia , ocular instability , nystagmus, maculopathy , glaucoma , retinopathy , orthoptic rehabilitation
  • Neurologic criteria : sever phasic disturbances , neurologic degenerative affection , non controlled seizure , severe handicap non compatible with prolonged sit position or concentration during 30 consecutive minutes
  • No command of french language
  • Non stabilized medical situation
  • Females who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the study period, or females of childbearing potential, not using a reliable means of contraception.
  • Not under any administrative or legal supervision

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación cruzada
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Arm 1:Treatment A
Treatment A (active) followed by treatment B (neutral)

The computer-based training task consists of a novel ramp-step search paradigm with a stimulus traversing the screen from left to right or right to left. Subjects are asked to pursue the stimulus (ramp phase) and then saccade to find its location when it suddenly jumps (step phase). The stimulus is an open spinning circle. At the end of each movement, the gap can be located at the top or at the bottom, and patients are asked to indicate this location by pushing the response button as quickly as possible.

The starting point will alternate between left and right. The training task includes 3 sessions with 100 movements each. Reaction Times and errors will be monitored online to ensure that the patient performs the task correctly.

Each treatment phase has the same pattern:

  • two visits in pre-tests evaluation (V1 and V2),
  • one visit to perform treatment (A or B) and to assess immediate and 2h post-effects (V3),
  • two visits after treatment (V4 at one week and V5 at one month).
Experimental: Arm 2: Treatment B
Treatment B (neutral) followed by treatment A (active)

Placebo treatment using the same computer-based training task, but including only the ramp phase.

Each treatment phase has the same pattern:

  • two visits in pre-tests evaluation (V1 and V2),
  • one visit to perform treatment (A or B) and to assess immediate and 2h post-effects (V3),
  • two visits after treatment (V4 at one week and V5 at one month).

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
Difference in performance (mean reaction time - RT) of an ecological visual search task between pre-tests and immediate post-test for each patient according to treatment (A or B).
Periodo de tiempo: 1 week
1 week

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Errors and omissions at each evaluation session for the visual search task
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2 and 5 weeks
Mean RT difference, errors and omissions at several visual tasks (rapid scanning task, exploratory visual tasks, reading task) at each evaluation session Parameters of visual field perimetry before and after treatment Oculo-motor parameters during the different tasks (i.e. amplitude and latencies for saccades and fixations)
1, 2 and 5 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Sophie Jacquin-Courtois, MD, PhD, Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

29 de noviembre de 2010

Finalización primaria (Actual)

13 de junio de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

13 de junio de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de noviembre de 2012

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de noviembre de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

21 de noviembre de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

26 de julio de 2018

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de julio de 2018

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2018

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2010.615
  • 2010-A00702-37 (Otro identificador: ID-RCB)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Treatment A

3
Suscribir