Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Mood and Influenza Vaccine Response: A Feasibility Trial

30 de abril de 2019 actualizado por: University of Nottingham

A Feasibility Trial of a Brief Positive Affect Intervention to Improve the Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine Response in Older Adults.

This study is a 2-arm, parallel, randomised controlled feasibility trial of a brief video intervention designed to induce positive affect (mood) in older adults in primary care settings prior to the receipt of influenza vaccination. Participants will be randomised into two conditions: experimental and active control. In the experimental condition, participants will view the approximately 15 minute long intervention video immediately prior to vaccination. In the active control condition, participants will view a matched video that is designed to be mood neutral. Pre-and-post positive affect levels will be assessed by self-report questionnaires. Immune response to the intervention and vaccination responses will be assessed in saliva and serum samples respectively.

The objectives of the study are to assess the impact of the intervention on mood, immune function, and antibody response to influenza vaccination in older adults. This feasibility trial will also allow data collection on exploring recruitment, attrition, intervention engagement, and practicality of collecting clinical data available through electronic records to inform the design of a future definitive trial.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) describe vaccinations as among the 10 most significant health achievements ever documented; and for many conditions they have been an unmitigated success (e.g., smallpox). There are, however, several populations in whom vaccine effectiveness is far from optimal. These populations are typically contending with underlying immune impairment by virtue of their advancing age and/or the presence of co-existing diseases (e.g., cancer). As a consequence, vaccines are most likely to fail those whom they most seek to benefit: individuals at the greatest risk of ill health.

This has prompted research into treatments that enhance immune function prior to vaccination, so called vaccine adjuvants. The aim of such treatments is to optimise the response the immune system makes to the vaccine antigens and, in so doing, increase the likelihood that the vaccine confers protection.

One area in which there has been interest is in the potential for developing psycho-behavioural vaccine adjuvants. There is considerable evidence that psychological and behavioural factors can modulate immunity; with diet, physical activity, stress, affect, sleep and social support all associated with immune response.

The investigators recently conducted a longitudinal observational cohort study of multiple psychological (positive affect, negative affect, stress) and behavioural (physical activity, sleep, diet) influences on short and long-term antibody responses to influenza vaccination in older adults. This identified positive affect as the most influential psycho-behavioural factor on influenza-specific antibody responses, independently predicting both short and long-term antibody responses in the weakest immunogenic strain above and beyond known demographic and clinical determinants. Intriguingly, the investigators also observed preliminary evidence that positive affect on the day of vaccination was more predictive of antibody responses following vaccination than mood measured over the longer period surrounding vaccination. As influenza-specific antibodies are a well-established correlate of protection from serologically and clinically diagnosed influenza incidence, these data suggest that increasing positive affect immediately prior to vaccination could be used as a non-pharmacological vaccine adjuvant.

Through a series of systematic steps, including focus groups and interviews with older adults and health care professionals, the investigators have recently developed a brief, positive affect intervention - designed to improve short-term mood in older adults and be deliverable within primary care. It is hoped this could act as a psycho-behavioural adjuvant to enhance poor responses to influenza vaccination in older adults. Before performing a definitive trial of the intervention's effectiveness, a feasibility trial is needed for number of reasons:

  1. To assess whether our intervention can enhance positive affect (mood)
  2. To collect information regarding likely recruitment, effect sizes, and attrition rates for informing the necessary size of a larger definitive trial
  3. To examine the practicality and acceptability of delivering the intervention in routine primary care settings
  4. To explore the feasibility of obtaining outcome data on healthcare usage for a large scale trial (hospitalisation, GP visits for flu-like symptoms from medical records)

In line with the above, the investigators will be conducting a 2-arm, parallel, randomised controlled feasibility trial of a brief video intervention designed to induce positive affect (mood) in older adults in primary care settings prior to the receipt of influenza vaccination. Participants will be randomised into two conditions: experimental and active control. In the experimental condition, participants will view the approximately 15 minute long intervention video immediately prior to vaccination. In the active control condition, participants will view a matched video that is designed to be mood neutral. Pre-and-post positive affect levels will be assessed by self-report questionnaires. Immune response to the intervention and vaccination responses will be assessed in saliva (pre/post intervention) and serum samples (pre/4 weeks post-vaccination/16weeks post-vaccination) respectively.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

106

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Nottingham, Reino Unido
        • University of Nottingham

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

65 años a 85 años (Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and Females aged 65-85 years (inclusive)
  • Received influenza vaccination for the 2016/17 season
  • Eligible to receive 2017/18 influenza vaccination as part of usual care
  • Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males and Females aged less than 65 or over 85 years (exclusive)
  • Did not receive influenza vaccination for the 2016/17 season
  • Ineligible to receive 2017/18 influenza vaccination as part of usual care
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Deemed by health care provider to be:

  • Too physically frail to participate
  • Diagnosed with dementia or other cognitive condition which would make participation difficult
  • Insufficient command of English language
  • Influenza vaccination contraindicated
  • Sufficiently impaired of hearing or vision that exposure to the intervention or control video content as intended would be compromised
  • Those for whom the collection of blood samples is contraindicated.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Cuadruplicar

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Experimental
Participants in the experimental condition will view a video designed to induce positive affect. This includes 3 short comedy clips (fork handles sketch, the two Ronnie's; A room with a view - faulty towers; Tim Vine Live stand-up extract), uplifting music (Jailhouse Rock - Elvis Presley; Happy Together - The Turtles), jokes and positive imagery. The content of the intervention has been informed by patient and public involvement, focus groups with older adults, and pilot testing.
See Previous Description
Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine 2017/18 (Delivered as part of Standard Care)
Comparador activo: Active Control
Participants in the control condition will view a video of matched length to the experimental condition video, but not designed to induce mood change. This includes short documentary clips (a pride in pencils; model railways, lecture extract on hydration), neutral music and images.
Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine 2017/18 (Delivered as part of Standard Care)
See Previous Description

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple]
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline).

Affective Slider (Betella & Verschure, 2016), consists of two single item visual analogue scales. Scores for each are presented as a value from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater pleasure (VAS-Valence) and arousal (VAS-Arousal).

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988). Positive and negative affect subscales were created by summing the scores of positive and negative adjectives respectively. For each sub scale, minimum score = 10, maximum score = 50 with higher scores indicating greater positive and negative affect respectively.

Pictorial scale of positive affect (unvalidated, internally developed). Participants completed a single-item photo-based measure of positive affect tailored for older adults. Participants were presented with six groups of images depicting varying degrees of positive affect, and indicate which best reflected how they felt at that moment. Minumum score 1, maximum score 6, higher scores indicate greater positive affect.

Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline).

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Recruitment
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
Recruitment rates to inform a future definitive trial
Baseline
Attrition
Periodo de tiempo: 4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination)
Attrition - to inform a future definitive trial
4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination)
Secretory IgA Response
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline).
Secretory IgA levels measured in saliva samples via ELISA. This is a non-specific measure of immunological response
Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline).
Vaccine Specific IgG Response
Periodo de tiempo: 4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination)

IgG levels against the 4 vaccine strains measured via ELISA.

Values represent equivalent ug/ml based on diluted sample absorbance value interpolation against a standard IgG curve, multiplied by the serum dilution score (i.e., 4000).

4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination)
Health Care Utilization
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to 6 months post-vaccination
Via medical records, we assessed health care usage potentially attributable to flu-like symptoms (e.g., GP visits, hospitalisation, antibiotic prescription) during the 6 months post-vaccination
Baseline to 6 months post-vaccination

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de mayo de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

28 de abril de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de mayo de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

8 de mayo de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

15 de julio de 2019

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de abril de 2019

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2019

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Positive Affect Intervention

3
Suscribir