Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Centralized Reminder Recall - Flu RCT2

4 de junio de 2019 actualizado por: Peter G Szilagyi, MD MPH, University of California, Los Angeles

Centralized IIS-Based Reminder Recall to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates in New York State - Second Trial in New York State

This study is related to a previous study, Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02924467. There are some modifications in relation to the intervention arms as well as the use of a different cohort, thereby justifying the second submission to Clinicaltrials.gov. This trial is taking place in New York State, through partnership with the New York State Health Department (excluding New York City), and Colorado. Each state will have it's own Clinicaltrial.gov submission -- this was decided as some of the intervention components are different enough that separate registrations were warranted.

Despite U.S. guidelines for influenza vaccination of all children starting at 6 months, only about half of children are vaccinated annually leading to substantial influenza disease in children and spread of disease to adults. A major barrier is that families are not reminded about the need for their children to receive influenza vaccination. The investigators will evaluate the impact of patient reminder/recall (R/R) performed by state immunization information systems to improve influenza vaccination rates by using 4 clinical trials (2 per state) in two different states. The investigators will assess effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 1) autodialer R/R 2) text messages R/R 3) mailed postcard R/R as compared to 4) standard of care control (no R/R).

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Annual epidemics of influenza A and B cause substantial morbidity and mortality in the US with high rates of hospitalizations, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and medical costs. Epidemics cause up to 40,000 deaths/year (mostly elderly) and extensive morbidity among children who play a key role in instigating and expanding epidemics. In addition, concerns about pandemic influenza heighten the importance of new mechanisms to rapidly inform the population about influenza and direct efforts for rapid vaccine delivery.

Since 2010, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recommended influenza vaccination for all children >6 months of age. However, vaccination rates remain very low. For the 2012-2013 season, only 56% of children 2-17years were vaccinated. Modeling studies suggest that as many as 19 million cases of influenza could be prevented if child vaccination rates were raised to 70% nationally.

The most effective strategy recommended by CDC and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services for improving childhood influenza vaccination rates is reminder/recall (R/R), sent by phone or mail, notifying parents of the need to vaccinate their child. We and others have shown that R/R can improve influenza vaccination rates by up to 20%. However, <16% of practices use R/R; barriers are practice costs, insufficient staff time and expertise, and lack of predictability regarding receipt of vaccine supplies.

Statewide immunization information systems (IISs) now exist in all states to track childhood vaccinations, but they have not been used for influenza vaccine R/R because of lack of evidence for their effectiveness and a lack of a template for IIS-based R/R. The investigators have united two leading immunization research groups (Denver, CO and Rochester (lead by personnel at UCLA), NY) to assess the impact of centralized IIS-based influenza vaccine R/R and to evaluate the effect of three types of R/R (autodialer, text message and mail R/R) over usual care. The investigators will also develop tools to aid other states in creating efficient IIS R/R systems for seasonal and possible pandemic influenza outbreaks.

For this second R/R trial in New York State, the intent is to evaluate the impact of reminder recalls, in the form of 1) autodialers 2) text messages and 3) postcards versus the standard of care control group, specifically in relation to raising influenza vaccination rates among children 6m-17 years of age.

The proposed design of this 4-arm RCT:

  1. standard of care control
  2. autodialer R/R -- with brief educational messages, practice name and practice phone number
  3. text message R/R-- with brief educational messages, practice name and practice phone number
  4. mailed (postcards) R/R-- with brief educational messages, practice name and practice phone number

Hypothesis 1: All IIS-C R/R modalities will be more effective than usual care

Hypothesis 2: Text messaging will be more cost-effective than other modalities

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

70190

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

6 meses a 17 años (Niño)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a record in the New York State Immunization Information System
  • in need of at least one influenza vaccination at the time of the beginning of the study
  • affiliated with a participating practice (145 randomly selected)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no record within the New York State Immunization Information System
  • up to date on their influenza vaccination
  • not affiliated with an eligible practice

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Autodial R/R
R/R Autodialers:Participants in this group will receive up to 3 influenza vaccination reminders via telephone call - with a brief educational message + practice name + practice phone number
Investigators will send out flu vaccine reminder recall notices via autodialer message to the parents of children 6 months - 17 years of age who are due for the flu vaccine, per the records in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS).
Experimental: Text Message R/R
R/R Texting: Participants in this group will receive up to 3 influenza vaccination reminders via text message - with a brief educational message + practice name + practice phone number
Investigators will send out flu vaccine reminder recall notices via text message to the parents of children 6 months - 17 years of age who are due for the flu vaccine, per the records in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS).
Experimental: Postcard R/R
R/R Mailed Postcard:Participants in this group will receive up to 3 influenza vaccination reminders via postcard - with a brief educational message + practice name + practice phone number
Investigators will send out flu vaccine reminder recall notices via mailed postcards to the parents of children 6 months - 17 years of age who are due for the flu vaccine, per the records in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS).
Sin intervención: Standard of Care Control
Participants in this group will not receive any influenza vaccination reminders

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The primary outcome is receipt of influenza vaccine comparing effectiveness of standard of care control to autodialer, text message and postcard R/R
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
Based on our prior studies, we plan to send up to 3 autodialer, text messages or postcards (based on randomization) reminders, roughly every 5-6 weeks. This will begin in October 2017 and end in December 2017. Outcomes are assessed at 6 months using IIS data.
6 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cost of the R/R intervention
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
A cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted to determine which modality of R/R (autodialer, text message or mailed postcard) is the most cost-effective in relation to improving influenza vaccination rates. The cost analysis will also compare autodialer to text, autodialer to postcard, and texting to postcards.
6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Peter Szilagyi, MD, MPH, University of California, Los Angeles

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

18 de octubre de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

19 de abril de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

4 de mayo de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de septiembre de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

22 de septiembre de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

27 de septiembre de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

5 de junio de 2019

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de junio de 2019

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2019

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 17-001153 (Otro identificador: University of California, Los Angeles, IRB)
  • 1R01AI114903 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Aggregate results will be prepared for publication at the end of the trial.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Infecciones por virus de ARN

Ensayos clínicos sobre R/R - Autodialers

Suscribir