Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Impact of a Psychological Biofeedback-Relaxation Intervention on Clinical, Physical and Psychological Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure

2 juin 2012 mis à jour par: Debra Moser, University of Kentucky

Biobehavioral Intervention in Heart Failure

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of biofeedback-relaxation combined with cognitive behavioral therapy on clinical, physical and psychological outcomes in patients with heart failure.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The long-term aim of this program of research is to improve physical and psychological health outcomes of adults with heart failure (HF). The specific aims of the randomized, controlled clinical trial are to test the effects of biofeedback-relaxation therapy in HF patients on rehospitalizations, cardiac mortality and quality of life, and on the secondary end-points of perceived control, anxiety, depression, skin temperature, plasma norepinephrine levels, and heart rate variability (HRV).

In the 1990s, HF emerged as a significant public health threat and reached epidemic proportions. Heart failure incidence and prevalence are expected to increase worldwide, and its impact to worsen dramatically. Individuals with HF suffer incapacitating physical symptoms, emotional distress, impaired quality of life, repeated rehospitalizations, and premature death. To combat the rising HF epidemic, it is crucial that researchers study new strategies to improve outcomes. Despite its potential as an effective partner to drug therapy, the role of nonpharmacologic intervention in HF management has received relatively little attention.

One may argue that drug therapy is effective enough that resources need not be expended on research of nonpharmacologic therapies. However, three points argue against this stance. First, despite substantial advances made in HF treatment with drug therapy, morbidity and mortality remain unacceptably high. As Kannel states, "innovations in treatment of...HF have thus far made a disappointingly small improvement in its…outlook". Second, although drug therapy frequently provides significant improvement in symptoms and functional ability, quality of life may not improve. This outcome is important for patients with HF because poorer quality of life independently predicts morbidity and mortality. Third, nonpharmacologic strategies can have effect sizes for important HF outcomes (e.g., rehospitalization rates/mortality and quality of life) that are similar to those seen with drug therapy. Recent studies demonstrated these therapies substantially improve outcomes beyond the level seen in the same patients with pharmacologic therapy.

Biofeedback-relaxation therapy is an innovative and promising nonpharmacologic strategy. An optimally effective treatment should have a beneficial effect on both pathophysiological and psychological manifestations of the target condition. This goal is especially important for a condition like HF, which has a profoundly negative impact on physical and psychological function. Hallmark pathophysiology in HF includes intense neurohumoral activation, initiated and sustained by the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), with marked vasoconstriction. Adverse psychological manifestations of chronic HF include feelings of loss of control, anxiety and depression. Both neurohumoral activation and the psychological consequences of HF contribute to poor quality of life, frequent HF hospitalizations, and increased mortality. As shown in the model in Figure 1, biofeedback-relaxation therapy takes three complementary, but separate pathways to improve outcomes. This biobehavioral therapy decreases SNS activation (as reflected by HRV and plasma norepinephrine), produces stress reduction (as reflected by changes in perceived control, anxiety and depression), and results in vasodilation (as reflected by skin temperature). Biofeedback-relaxation therapy can have a powerful influence because of these separate, yet complementary effects. For example, SNS activation is directly decreased by biofeedback-relaxation therapy, but also indirectly as a result of stress reduction with increased control, and decreased anxiety and depression. As a result of its physical and psychological effects, biofeedback-relaxation could have a clinically meaningful impact on rehospitalizations, survival and quality of life. For these reasons, biofeedback-relaxation may be an effective adjunct to pharmacologic therapy in the management of HF. Thus, the purpose of the proposed research is to examine the impact of biofeedback-relaxation training on HF patient outcomes.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

380

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, États-Unis, 40535
        • University of Kentucky

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

21 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • confirmed diagnosis of chronic advanced HF. Other sample selection criteria include: 1) on stable doses of HF medication for at least one month; and 2) not referred for heart transplantation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they have: 1) valvular heart disease (as a primary cause of their HF; can have it if the primary cause is ischemic, hypertensive or idiopathic), peripartum heart failure, myocarditis; 2) history of cerebral vascular accident (CVA) within previous 3 months or major stroke sequelae; 3) history of major extremity vascular problems; 4) recent (within 3 months) myocardial infarction (MI); 5) coexisting terminal illness; 6) systolic blood pressure less than 80 mmHg; or 7) previous experience with biofeedback, relaxation .

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: 1
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Relaxation/biofeedback
Comparateur placebo: 2
Untrained relaxation
Aucune intervention: 3
Usual Care

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Examination of the impact of biofeedback-relaxation training on HF patient outcomes.
Délai: Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Perceived Control
Délai: Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Anxiety
Délai: Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Depression
Délai: Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Skin Temperature
Délai: Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Heart Rate Variability
Délai: Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Plasma Norepinephrine
Délai: Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months
Baseline, 3-, and 12-Months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Debra Moser, DNSc, RN, University of Kentucky

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 juillet 2004

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mai 2010

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mai 2010

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 novembre 2005

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 novembre 2005

Première publication (Estimation)

21 novembre 2005

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

5 juin 2012

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 juin 2012

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2012

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 8567
  • R01NR008567 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)
  • R01NR008567-01A1 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Insuffisance cardiaque

Essais cliniques sur Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

3
S'abonner