- ICH GCP
- USA klinikai vizsgálatok nyilvántartása
- Klinikai vizsgálat NCT00155727
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
Comparison of Treatment Outcome for Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Traditional Open Colectomy for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
The laparoscopic colectomy has been enthusiastically used by many colorectal surgeons in Taiwan, Japan, Europe, and USA, for around 10 years. Further clarification of the controversies cited above will be based on the evidence-based medicine, i.e., the randomized, well-controlled, prospective clinical trials. Actually, a handful of randomized prospective data regarding the laparoscopic colectomy has been appeared in USA and Europe. However, we still do not have this kind of data in Taiwan, and therefore this study is important and mandatory.
In this project, we assumed that a difference in cancer-related survival of less then 15% between treatments indicates an equivalent efficacy. Assuming a 70% 5-year, cancer-related survival of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients in the open colectomy group, a minimum of 100 patients per group was required to showed that both surgical techniques were equivalent with an α-level of 0.20 and a β error of 0.05. Only patients with stage II and III disease undergoing curative resection will be enrolled onto this study. The patients will be randomly allocated to either treatment group by block randomization method. Postoperatively, the patients will be prospectively evaluated regarding the following parameters including operative stress, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum interleukin-6, WBC counts and classification, CD-4 to CD-8 ratio, postoperative life quality, such as wound size, degree of pain, time to have flatus passage and feeding, time to resume daily activity and work, and the oncological outcomes, such as recurrence patterns of tumor, and 5-year patient survival. The evaluation of above-mentioned parameters will be single-blindly done by our research assistant, who has no idea of both surgical techniques. We hope this study will promote the level of surgical research in Taiwan.
A tanulmány áttekintése
Állapot
Körülmények
Részletes leírás
The appropriateness of laparoscopic surgery for the resection of colorectal cancer has been the focus of controversy. The pros insist that besides the smaller wound size, laparoscopic colectomy should induce lesser perioperative stress, which was evidenced by the less pain, quicker flatus passage, early feeding, and more rapid to resume daily activity and work. Moreover, since the laparoscopic colectomy induces lesser immunosuppression, this may be potentially positive for the treatment of colorectal cancer patients. However, the cons insist that first of all, when the summation of 4 or 5 ports, and incisional wound to retrieve specimen in laparoscopic colectomy were considered, the total wound size in laparoscopic colectomy is basically similar to that of the open colectomy. Secondly, since the laparoscopic surgeons advocated that the extent of intra-abdominal dissection was the same between laparoscopic and open colectomy, it seems illogical to speculate that laparoscopic procedure is less invasive for the colorectal cancer patients than the open procedure. Moreover, in regard of the short-term improvement of life quality (based on the evaluation of parameters including less painful, quicker to have flatus passage, feeding, to resume daily activity, to return to work, etc.), there is no denying that these potential benefits are at the sacrifice of spending more money, and therefore, it is still unknown if laparoscopic colectomy is cost-effective. Thirdly and most important of all, laparoscopic colectomy is a more difficult for most surgeons, and therefore the learning curve is more difficult to overcome. Moreover, many surgeons concerned if pneumoperitoneum during the laparoscopic procedure will reinforce the intraperitoneal spread of colorectal cancer. Based on above-mentioned reasons, many colorectal surgeons hesisted between the lines of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic colectomy.
However, apparently, the laparoscopic colectomy has been enthusiastically used by many colorectal surgeons in Taiwan, Japan, Europe, and USA, for around 10 years. Further clarification of the controversies cited above will be based on the evidence-based medicine, i.e., the randomized, well-controlled, prospective clinical trials. Actually, a handful of randomized prospective data regarding the laparoscopic colectomy has been appeared in USA and Europe. However, we still do not have this kind of data in Taiwan, and therefore this study is important and mandatory.
In this project, we assumed that a difference in cancer-related survival of less then 15% between treatments indicates an equivalent efficacy. Assuming a 70% 5-year, cancer-related survival of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients in the open colectomy group, a minimum of 100 patients per group was required to showed that both surgical techniques were equivalent with an α-level of 0.20 and a β error of 0.05. Only patients with stage II and III disease undergoing curative resection will be enrolled onto this study. The patients will be randomly allocated to either treatment group by block randomization method. Postoperatively, the patients will be prospectively evaluated regarding the following parameters including operative stress, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum interleukin-6, WBC counts and classification, CD-4 to CD-8 ratio, postoperative life quality, such as wound size, degree of pain, time to have flatus passage and feeding, time to resume daily activity and work, and the oncological outcomes, such as recurrence patterns of tumor, and 5-year patient survival. The evaluation of above-mentioned parameters will be single-blindly done by our research assistant, who has no idea of both surgical techniques. We hope this study will promote the level of surgical research in Taiwan.
Tanulmány típusa
Beiratkozás
Kapcsolatok és helyek
Tanulmányi helyek
-
-
-
Taipei, Tajvan, 100
- Toborzás
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, TAIWAN, R.O.C.
-
Kapcsolatba lépni:
- Jin-Tung Liang, M.D., Ph.D.
- Telefonszám: 886-2-23562068
- E-mail: jintung@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
-
Kutatásvezető:
- Jin-Tung Liang, M.D., Ph.D.
-
-
Részvételi kritériumok
Jogosultsági kritériumok
Tanulmányozható életkorok
Egészséges önkénteseket fogad
Tanulmányozható nemek
Leírás
Inclusion Criteria:
- All consecutive patients admitted to our unit since January 2000 with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum will be assessed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cancer with distant metastasis, adjacent organ invasion, intestinal obstruction, past colonic surgery, and no consent to participate in the study.
Tanulási terv
Hogyan készül a tanulmány?
Tervezési részletek
- Időperspektívák: Leendő
Együttműködők és nyomozók
Szponzor
Tanulmányi rekorddátumok
Tanulmány főbb dátumok
Tanulmány kezdete
A tanulmány befejezése
Tanulmányi regisztráció dátumai
Először benyújtva
Először nyújtották be, amely megfelel a minőségbiztosítási kritériumoknak
Első közzététel (Becslés)
Tanulmányi rekordok frissítései
Utolsó frissítés közzétéve (Becslés)
Az utolsó frissítés elküldve, amely megfelel a minőségbiztosítási kritériumoknak
Utolsó ellenőrzés
Több információ
A tanulmányhoz kapcsolódó kifejezések
Kulcsszavak
További vonatkozó MeSH feltételek
Egyéb vizsgálati azonosító számok
- 9100017028
Ezt az információt közvetlenül a clinicaltrials.gov webhelyről szereztük be, változtatás nélkül. Ha bármilyen kérése van vizsgálati adatainak módosítására, eltávolítására vagy frissítésére, kérjük, írjon a következő címre: register@clinicaltrials.gov. Amint a változás bevezetésre kerül a clinicaltrials.gov oldalon, ez a webhelyünkön is automatikusan frissül. .
Klinikai vizsgálatok a Colorectalis rák
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH)ToborzásAnatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Korai stádiumú emlőkarcinóma | Anatómiai Stage I Breast Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8Egyesült Államok
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)ToborzásAnatómiai stádiumú emlőrák AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8Egyesült Államok
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institute on Aging (NIA)ToborzásAnatómiai stádiumú emlőrák AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8Egyesült Államok
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)ToborzásAnatómiai stádiumú emlőrák AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8Egyesült Államok
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)BefejezveVékonybél adenokarcinóma | III. stádiumú vékonybél-adenokarcinóma AJCC v8 | IIIA stádiumú vékonybél adenokarcinóma AJCC v8 | IIIB stádiumú vékonybél adenokarcinóma AJCC v8 | IV. stádiumú vékonybél adenokarcinóma AJCC v8 | Vater adenokarcinóma ampulla | Stage III Ampull of Vater Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... és egyéb feltételekEgyesült Államok
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)ToborzásAnatómiai stádiumú emlőrák AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8Egyesült Államok
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterMég nincs toborzásAnatómiai stádiumú emlőrák AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8Egyesült Államok
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Aktív, nem toborzóStage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 és v7 | Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v6 és v7 | IIB stádiumú mellrák AJCC v6 és v7 | Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7 | IIIA stádiumú mellrák AJCC v7 | IIIB stádiumú mellrák AJCC v7 | IIIC stádiumú mellrák AJCC v7Egyesült Államok
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)BefejezveAnatómiai stádiumú emlőrák AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage 0 Breast Cancer AJCC v8Egyesült Államok
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)ToborzásAnatómiai stádiumú emlőrák AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatómiai Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Invazív emlőkarcinómaEgyesült Államok