Effetti affettivi degli oppioidi preoperatori: uno studio randomizzato, in doppio cieco, controllato con placebo (AFFECT2)
Comprensione dell'uso di oppioidi prima e dopo l'intervento chirurgico in Norvegia: uno studio multicentrico prospettico e uno studio controllato randomizzato in doppio cieco
- To investigate and compare the affective short-term effects of opioid drugs: morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl, administered to the patients before the induction of general anesthesia.
- Charting opioid use after surgery in patients treated at hospitals in Norway
- Identify predictors for postoperative opioid use and persistent pain
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Descrizione dettagliata
The aim of the present study is to assess and compare, with a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, the affective effects of three commonly used opioid analgesics (Morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl) administered in three different doses before surgery in a clinical setting associated with physiological and psychological stress.
As a starting point, we have conducted an observational quality control study on peri-operative opioid pain management in day surgery patients.
Quality control study - a pilot study In this observational quality control study, we measured acute effects of the opioid agonist Remifentanil (effect site concentration 5ng/ml, Minto model) in day surgery patients on the operating table at Kongsberg hospital. Patients rated their levels of "feeling good" and "anxious" on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) immediately before and 1 minute after receiving remifentanil infusion. They also rated drug-specific effects such as "feeling high", "liking the drug effects" and their "level of drug-related discomfort". Moreover, we collected data on postoperative opioid use and pain during recovery through a telephone interview on the day following the surgery. The study was conducted with the usual standard hospital treatment and as such, did not interfere with the patients' medical procedures. All the procedures were approved by the data protection officer at Kongsberg Hospital, and all included patients signed informed consent on the day of surgery.
In the weeks prior to surgery participants received a questionnaire to assess their pain levels, nervousness and demographics as part of the hospital's standard procedure. On the day of surgery, approximately 30 min before surgery (T2) patients were asked to fill in questionnaires to assess mood, pain and prior opioid use. One minute before and one minute after opioid ( administration (T3), the patient was asked to rate mood, anxiety, drug liking and drug related discomfort. On the day following surgery patients were contacted by phone to assess their mood, pain and pain interference, as well as their pain relief strategies in the last 24h (e.g. use of provided analgesics).
160 patients were included in the pilot quality control study. The results of the pilot study show that patients report a clear feeling of 'drug high' after remifentanil infusion. Surprisingly, however, the opioid analgesic induced only a weak reduction of anxiety, and the majority of patients reported feeling worse or equally good, but not better, after the infusion. In the postoperative phone interview, many patients tell us they have not used any of the opioid drugs prescribed for at-home pain relief during the first 24 hours are recovering at home. Stated reasons include a fear of addiction, as well as a wish to keep the analgesics in case of breakthrough/peak pain at a later stage. These preliminary results do not support the opioid pre-induction procedure as an effective manner to produce pre-surgery stress relief. It might be possible that the subjective perception of stress relief does not match the physiological relief reaction to stress.
On the basis of these intriguing, preliminary findings, we will now conduct a more comprehensive randomized double-blind controlled study comparing different classes of pre-surgical opioid analgesics on the subjective and physiological affective reactions in an acute stress clinical situation in Norway.
Possible participants of the AFFECT2 RCT (randomized controlled trial) will also be asked if they wish to join a parallel longitudinal study conducted in collaboration with the University of Oslo (UiO) in which we will collect and analyse data on relevant pre-surgery risk factors for problematic opioid use, and to quantify opioid-induced analgesia before and after surgery using prescription registry data.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Fase 4
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Oslo
-
Oslo, Oslo, Norvegia
- Harald Lenz
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Health status ASA1 (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status) or ASA2 as categorised by a medical doctor at the hospital based on medical history, physical examination, laboratory test etc. unrelated to the current study.
ASA1 and ASA2 (ASA1 is defined as "Healthy, non-smoking, no or minimal alcohol use" and ASA2 is defined as "Mild diseases only without substantive functional limitations). Being eligible for day surgery means participants are overtly healthy as determined by clinical staff.
- The participant is considered as eligible for the use of fentanyl, morphine and oxycodone by a medical doctor at the hospital, based on an overall assessment of the psychiatric and somatic condition, used medical drugs, regarding possible interactions and contraindications for the use of the study medicaments.
- Body weight and body mass index (BMI) within the range 18-35 kg/m2 (inclusive).
- Capable of giving signed informed consent as which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
- Having good verbal communication skills in Norwegian.
- Patients undergoing planned day surgery with general anesthesia (outpatient sample).
- Orthopedic, rectal, gynecological, hand and foot surgery, and minor vascular procedures.
- Inpatients undergoing planned gynecological and orthopedic surgery.
- Hysterectomy, laparoscopic ovariectomy, lumbal herniotomy and other related procedures.
- Minor gastrointestinal surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known allergic reactions to morphine, oxycodone,or fentanyl. Known allergic reactions to any of the incredients described in the SPC, pt 6.1.
- Severe chronic obstructive lung disease,
- Cor pulmonale,
- Severe bronchial asthma,
- Severe respiratory failure with hypoxemia and hypercapnia
- Moderate to severe hepatic impairment,
- Moderate to severe kidney failure
- Acute abdomen
- Increased brain pressure
- Head trauma
- Use of MAO blockers in the last two weeks
- Hypovolemia
- Hypotension
- Myasthenia gravis
- Any other health status not corresponding to ASA1 or ASA2. This includes patients with severe disease burden, major psychiatric disorders that could interfere with the procedures and communication.
- Pregnancy. Women of childbearing potential defined as all premenopausal female (a postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause) will be asked if they are pregnant.
- Breastfeeding women.
- Illegal drugs use like opioids, cocaine and amphetamine
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Altro
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparatore placebo: Placebo
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of placebo (0.9% NaCl intravenously). This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of placebo intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Morphine 2.5 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of morphine 2.5 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of 2.5 mg morphine intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Morphine 5 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of morphine 5 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of morphine 5 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Morphine 10 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of morphine 10 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of morphine 10 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Oxycodone 2.5 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 2.5 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 2.5 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Oxycodone 5 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 5 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 5 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Oxycodone 10 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 10 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 10 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Fentanyl 0.025 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.025 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.025 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Fentanyl 0.05 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.05 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.05 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Fentanyl 0.1 mg
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.1 mg intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia |
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.1 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
Altri nomi:
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Anxious
Lasso di tempo: 8-10 minutes
|
Asking the patient of feeling anxious; Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=not anxious and 10=feeling extremely anxious |
8-10 minutes
|
|
Relaxed
Lasso di tempo: 8-10 minutes
|
Asking the patient of feeling relaxed. Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=not relaxed and 10=very relaxed. |
8-10 minutes
|
|
Pain level
Lasso di tempo: 8-10 minutes
|
Asking the patient of pain level. Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=no pain and 10= worst pain imaginable |
8-10 minutes
|
|
Good
Lasso di tempo: 8-10 minutes
|
Asking the patient of feeling good. Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling no good and 10= feeling very good. |
8-10 minutes
|
|
Dizzy
Lasso di tempo: 2-4 minutes
|
Asking the patient of feeling dizzy. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not dizzy and 10=feeling very dizzy. |
2-4 minutes
|
|
Sedated
Lasso di tempo: 2-4 minutes
|
Asking the patient of feeling sedated. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not sedated and 10=feeling very sedated. |
2-4 minutes
|
|
Feeling high, Numeric rating scale 0 -10
Lasso di tempo: 2-4 minutes
|
Asking the patient of feeling high. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not high and 10=feeling very high. |
2-4 minutes
|
|
Euphoric
Lasso di tempo: 2-4 minutes
|
Asking the patient of feeling high. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not euphoric and 10=feeling very euphoric. |
2-4 minutes
|
|
Drug liking
Lasso di tempo: 2-4 minutes
|
Asking the patient of drug liking. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not drug liking and 10=feeling very drug liking. |
2-4 minutes
|
|
Drug disliking
Lasso di tempo: 2-4 minutes
|
Asking the patient of drug disliking. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not drug disliking and 10=feeling very drug disliking. |
2-4 minutes
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Onset time
Lasso di tempo: Subjective onset time of the three opioids during the 2 minutes observation time before anaesthesia induction
|
Determine onset time of subjective drug effect of the three opioids (each at three different doses) and proportion of participants that report feeling a drug effect within 0-2 minutes |
Subjective onset time of the three opioids during the 2 minutes observation time before anaesthesia induction
|
Altre misure di risultato
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Heart rate
Lasso di tempo: 10 min
|
beats/min prior opioid and post opioid intravenously |
10 min
|
|
Heart rate variability
Lasso di tempo: 10 min
|
Heart rate variability (HRV) prior opioid and post opioid intravenously |
10 min
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Gernot Ernst, MD,PhD, Kongsberg Hospital, Vestre Viken Health Trust Norway
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Angst MS, Lazzeroni LC, Phillips NG, Drover DR, Tingle M, Ray A, Swan GE, Clark JD. Aversive and reinforcing opioid effects: a pharmacogenomic twin study. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jul;117(1):22-37. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825a2a4e.
- Astuto, M., & Lauretta, D. (2009). Anesthesia Induction. In M. Astuto (Ed.), Basics (pp. 85-99). Milano: Springer Milan.
- Bershad AK, Miller MA, Norman GJ, de Wit H. Effects of opioid- and non-opioid analgesics on responses to psychosocial stress in humans. Horm Behav. 2018 Jun;102:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
- Bjerkeset O, Romild U, Smith GD, Hveem K. The associations of high levels of C-reactive protein with depression and myocardial infarction in 9258 women and men from the HUNT population study. Psychol Med. 2011 Feb;41(2):345-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000887. Epub 2010 May 6.
- Choudhary P, Dutta A, Sethi N, Sood J, Rai D, Gupta M. Pre-induction fentanyl dose-finding study for controlled hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;63(8):653-659. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_866_18.
- Courtwright, D. T. (2001). Dark Paradise: A History of Opiate Addiction in America. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
- Dutta A, Sethi N, Choudhary P, Sood J, Panday BC, Chugh PT. The impact of preinduction fentanyl dosing strategy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Opioid Manag. 2018 Jul/Aug;14(4):283-293. doi: 10.5055/jom.2018.0460.
- Evans SM, Foltin RW, Levin FR, Fischman MW. Behavioral and subjective effects of DN-2327 (pazinaclone) and alprazolam in normal volunteers. Behav Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;6(2):176-186.
- Helsedirektoratet. (2018). Utvikling og variasjon i kirurgisk behandling 2013-2017. Retrieved from Oslo:
- Martel MO, Dolman AJ, Edwards RR, Jamison RN, Wasan AD. The association between negative affect and prescription opioid misuse in patients with chronic pain: the mediating role of opioid craving. J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
- McHugh RK, Weiss RD, Cornelius M, Martel MO, Jamison RN, Edwards RR. Distress Intolerance and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Patients With Chronic Pain. J Pain. 2016 Jul;17(7):806-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
- Morean ME, de Wit H, King AC, Sofuoglu M, Rueger SY, O'Malley SS. The drug effects questionnaire: psychometric support across three drug types. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 May;227(1):177-92. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2954-z. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
- Naude PJW, Roest AM, Stein DJ, de Jonge P, Doornbos B. Anxiety disorders and CRP in a population cohort study with 54,326 participants: The LifeLines study. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;19(6):461-470. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2018.1433325. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
- Sneader, W. (2005). Drug discovery : a history. Chichester: Wiley.
- Thomas EA, Garland EL. Mindfulness is Associated With Increased Hedonic Capacity Among Chronic Pain Patients Receiving Extended Opioid Pharmacotherapy. Clin J Pain. 2017 Feb;33(2):166-173. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000379.
- Tracey I, Woolf CJ, Andrews NA. Composite Pain Biomarker Signatures for Objective Assessment and Effective Treatment. Neuron. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):783-800. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.019.
- Colasanti A, Rabiner EA, Lingford-Hughes A, Nutt DJ. Opioids and anxiety. J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Nov;25(11):1415-33. doi: 10.1177/0269881110367726. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
- Dale O, Moksnes K, Kaasa S. European Palliative Care Research Collaborative pain guidelines: opioid switching to improve analgesia or reduce side effects. A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):494-503. doi: 10.1177/0269216310384902.
- Deighton S, Neville A, Pusch D, Dobson K. Biomarkers of adverse childhood experiences: A scoping review. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Nov;269:719-732. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.097. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
- Doleman B, Leonardi-Bee J, Heinink TP, Bhattacharjee D, Lund JN, Williams JP. Pre-emptive and preventive opioids for postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 3;12(12):CD012624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012624.pub2.
- Drewes AM, Jensen RD, Nielsen LM, Droney J, Christrup LL, Arendt-Nielsen L, Riley J, Dahan A. Differences between opioids: pharmacological, experimental, clinical and economical perspectives. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;75(1):60-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04317.x.
- Garland EL, Froeliger B, Zeidan F, Partin K, Howard MO. The downward spiral of chronic pain, prescription opioid misuse, and addiction: cognitive, affective, and neuropsychopharmacologic pathways. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
- Levy N, Mills P. Controlled-release opioids cause harm and should be avoided in management of postoperative pain in opioid naive patients. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):e86-e90. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 19. No abstract available.
- Li PH, Ue KL, Wagner A, Rutkowski R, Rutkowski K. Opioid Hypersensitivity: Predictors of Allergy and Role of Drug Provocation Testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Nov-Dec;5(6):1601-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.035. Epub 2017 May 24.
- Natusch D. Equianalgesic doses of opioids - their use in clinical practice. Br J Pain. 2012 Feb;6(1):43-6. doi: 10.1177/2049463712437628. No abstract available.
- Schaffer CB, Nordahl TE, Schaffer LC, Howe J. Mood-elevating effects of opioid analgesics in patients with bipolar disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Fall;19(4):449-52. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2007.19.4.449.
- Sgoifo A, Carnevali L, Alfonso Mde L, Amore M. Autonomic dysfunction and heart rate variability in depression. Stress. 2015;18(3):343-52. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2015.1045868. Epub 2015 May 25.
- Stanley TH. The history and development of the fentanyl series. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992 Apr;7(3 Suppl):S3-7. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(92)90047-l.
- Stone AL, Becker LG, Huber AM, Catalano RF. Review of risk and protective factors of substance use and problem use in emerging adulthood. Addict Behav. 2012 Jul;37(7):747-75. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
- Wang LP, Hermann C, Westrin P. Thiopentone requirements in adults after varying pre-induction doses of fentanyl. Anaesthesia. 1996 Sep;51(9):831-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb12611.x.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
- Sintomi comportamentali
- Comportamento
- Sintomi affettivi
- Composti eterociclici, 1-anello
- Composti eterociclici
- Composti eterociclici, anello fuso
- Alcaloidi
- Idrocarburi policiclici aromatici
- Composti policiclici
- Piperidine
- Composti eterociclici, 4 o più anelli
- Morfinani
- Alcaloidi oppiati
- Composti eterociclici, anello a ponte
- Fenantreni
- Derivati della morfina
- Codeina
- Morfina
- Fentanil
- Ossicodone
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- AFFECT2 Version 2, 04.11.2022
- 2022-002938-13 (Numero EudraCT)
- 2024-518308-37-00 (Ctis)
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .