Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

A Multicenter, Prospective, Phase III Clinical Study of Proton Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Versus Photon Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Untreated Non-metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

13 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center
Proton therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma can reduce radiotherapy-related toxic reactions, and some retrospective studies have found that proton therapy improves the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, high-level prospective clinical evidence is still lacking. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and side effects of proton therapy compared with photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma through a multicenter, prospective, phase III clinical trial, providing more high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for proton therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common malignant tumor of the head and neck. The incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is high in China, accounting for 47% of cases worldwide, and the incidence in southern China is 20 times the global rate. Among these, the incidence in Guangdong is one of the highest in the world, which is why nasopharyngeal carcinoma is also referred to as the 'Guangdong tumor'. Because the growth site of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is adjacent to the base of the skull, it easily invades the skull base. Its pathology is mainly moderately to poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, which is sensitive to radiation; therefore, radiotherapy is the first-choice treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

In recent years, with the widespread application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technology and the development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the 5-year survival rate of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma has exceeded 80%, and many patients survive long-term. Therefore, while further attention is paid to improving efficacy, it is even more important to focus on the long-term quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Due to the dosimetric limitations of conventional photon radiotherapy, patients treated with IMRT often experience some late complications that seriously affect quality of life, such as dry mouth, restricted mouth opening, radiation-induced caries, radiation-induced cranial nerve injury, brain injury, spinal cord injury, and pituitary dysfunction. In addition, due to the large area of low-dose irradiation, the incidence of second primary tumors in the head and neck caused by radiotherapy is approximately 0.5-3%.

Proton therapy is a new technology that uses the unique 'Bragg peak' characteristic of proton beams to treat tumors, and it has been widely applied in many developed countries in Europe and America. Photon beams gradually lose energy after penetrating to a certain depth in the human body. By the time they reach the lesion, the dose intensity has already significantly decreased, while surrounding normal tissues (OARs) such as the brainstem, spinal cord, salivary glands, and skin are exposed to relatively high doses of radiation, leading to radiotherapy side effects. In contrast, proton therapy, due to its special 'Bragg peak' characteristic, maintains a roughly stable dose after entering the body, then increases and reaches a peak to release all its energy when irradiating the lesion, achieving a 'targeted blast' on the tumor, and rapidly decreases after passing through the lesion, resulting in minimal radiation to the surrounding normal tissues and thus reducing the occurrence of long-term adverse reactions. An early study explored the clinical outcomes of 17 T4 stage NPC patients treated with a combination of proton and photon therapy. At three years, patients had a local control (LC) rate of 92%, disease-free survival rate of 75%, and overall survival (OS) rate of 74%. Late toxic reactions included one patient with temporal lobe imaging changes, one patient with mandibular radiation osteonecrosis, and two patients with endocrine dysfunction. Researchers indicated that combined proton and photon therapy could achieve good local control in T4 NPC patients, regardless of whether chemotherapy was also used. A case-control study on NPC patients published in 2015 showed that 20% of patients receiving intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) required gastric tube insertion, while 65% of patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with photons required it. Additionally, the incidence of vomiting, nausea, gastrointestinal, and other radiotherapy side effects in the IMPT group was much lower than in the IMRT group.The Trento Proton Therapy Center in Italy published in 2019 the efficacy and toxicity of proton plus photon radiotherapy for locally advanced NPC. The study included 17 previously untreated patients with stage III-IVa NPC, who received photon radiotherapy with dose-escalated proton therapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy. The results showed 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year local recurrence-free rates of 94%, 86%, and 86%, respectively. Regarding acute toxicities, one patient required parenteral nutrition due to difficulty swallowing (16% weight loss) and was hospitalized for a short period (10 days). Two other patients experienced treatment interruptions of 5 and 6 days due to acute mucositis and having to undergo tympanostomy for otitis media. Regarding late toxicities, six patients showed temporal lobe necrosis on brain MRI, and one of them developed corresponding symptoms. A 2023 study on the use of photon and proton radiotherapy in definitive treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma included 80 non-metastatic NPC patients treated at their institution from 2012 to 2022; 48 received photon radiotherapy, and 32 received proton therapy. The photon and proton cohorts were compared. The median follow-up was 30 months. The results showed that the 2-year progression-free survival was 63.9% in the photon group and 90.3% in the proton group; the 2-year overall survival was 86.8% in the photon group and as high as 96.8% in the proton group. A 2025 retrospective study from Taiwan, China showed that compared with intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy, proton therapy improved survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

504

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed by histology and/or cytology as non-keratinizing carcinoma of the nasopharynx (differentiated or undifferentiated type, i.e., WHO type II or III).
  2. Clinical stage: T1-4N0-3M0, I-III stage (AJCC 9th edition).
  3. Age: ≥ 18 years old, ≤ 70 years old.
  4. Gender: No restrictions.
  5. ECOG ≤ 1.
  6. Good organ function:

    Normal bone marrow function: WBC ≥ 4×109/L, Platelet ≥ 100×109/L, HGB ≥ 90g/L Total bilirubin, AST, ALT ≤ 2.0× upper limit of normal value; Creatinine clearance rate ≥ 60ml/min or Creatinine ≤ 1.5× upper limit of normal value.

  7. The patient has signed the informed consent form and is willing and able to comply with the study visit schedule, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other research procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has a poor general condition and is in a state of poor health; or the patient has already experienced metastasis.
  2. The patient has an uncontrolled severe infectious disease.
  3. The patient has severe diseases or complications in the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys or other systems, and the investigator judges that they cannot complete the clinical trial.
  4. There are implants such as artificial ears or dentures within the radiotherapy range, and the investigator judges that they are not suitable for proton therapy.
  5. The patient has a history of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.
  6. The patient has mental illness, drug abuse or alcohol dependence.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Non randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Proton therapy group
All patients received proton therapy, with a prescribed dose of 70Gy in 33 fractions, 5 days per week, for a total of 6.5 weeks.
Treatment planning and target delineation: All patients were in the supine position with the head extended backward, with the mask fixed, and enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for positioning. The slice thickness was 1.25mm. The gross tumor volume (GTV) included the recurrent primary lesion. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the anatomical expansion of the tumor and the suspicious lesions visible under the microscope. CTV specific delineation refers to the Chinese Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy Guidelines (2022 edition).Radiation dose and treatment plan: The prescribed dose was 70 Gray (Gy) delivered in 33 fractions. Physicists design intensity-modulated proton therapy plans according to the physician's requirements. After the radiotherapy plan was designed, it was evaluated and repeatedly optimized by the physician and the physicist until satisfactory results were achieved. Treatment: was required for each treatment session.
Comparatore placebo: Photon therapy group
All patients received photon therapy, with a prescribed dose of 70Gy in 33 fractions, 5 days per week, for a total of 6.5 weeks.
Treatment planning and target delineation: All patients were in the supine position with the head extended backward, with the mask fixed, and enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for positioning. The slice thickness was 1.25mm. The gross tumor volume (GTV) included the recurrent primary lesion. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the anatomical expansion of the tumor and the suspicious lesions visible under the microscope. CTV specific delineation refers to the Chinese Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy Guidelines (2022 edition).Radiation dose and treatment plan: The prescribed dose was 70 Gray (Gy) delivered in 33 fractions. Physicists design intensity-modulated photon therapy plans according to the physician's requirements. After the radiotherapy plan was designed, it was evaluated and repeatedly optimized by the physician and the physicist until satisfactory results were achieved. Treatment: was required for each treatment session.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
3-year progression-free survival time
Lasso di tempo: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Defined as the time interval from the start of treatment to tumor progression or death for any reason; if there is no tumor progression, it is until the time of the last follow-up.
From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Incidenza di gravi complicanze tardive
Lasso di tempo: Dal momento dell'arruolamento al periodo di follow-up di tre anni
La proporzione di soggetti la cui reazione di tossicità è di livello 3 durante il periodo di sperimentazione clinica. I ricercatori registrano gli AE (Eventi Avversi) che sono comparsi durante il ciclo di sperimentazione clinica e li classificano in base alla Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) versione 5.0.
Dal momento dell'arruolamento al periodo di follow-up di tre anni
Risposte al trattamento a breve termine
Lasso di tempo: Dall'arruolamento al periodo di follow-up di tre mesi
La proporzione di pazienti che ha ottenuto una risposta al trattamento al termine della chemioterapia neoadiuvante e 3 mesi dopo la radioterapia per valutare l'effetto terapeutico a breve termine. La risposta al trattamento sarà valutata secondo i criteri RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) e classificata come Risposta Completa (CR), Risposta Parziale (PR), Malattia Stabile (SD) o Malattia Progressiva (PD).
Dall'arruolamento al periodo di follow-up di tre mesi
Overall survival time
Lasso di tempo: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Defined as the time interval from the start of treatment to death from any cause; if no death occurs, it is until the date of the last follow-up.
From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Distance-free metastasis-free survival time (DMFS)
Lasso di tempo: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
The definition is the time interval from the start of treatment to the occurrence of distant metastasis. If there is no distant metastasis, it is the time until the last follow-up.
From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
No local region recurrence-free survival time (LRFS)
Lasso di tempo: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
It is defined as the time interval from the start of treatment to the occurrence of local regional recurrence. If there is no local regional recurrence, it is the time until the last follow-up.
From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 maggio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

30 dicembre 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

30 dicembre 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

5 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

5 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

11 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

15 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

13 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Carcinoma rinofaringeo (NPC)

Prove cliniche su Proton Therapy System (ProBeam)

Sottoscrivi