Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

A Patient Advocate to Improve Real-world Asthma Management for Inner City Adults (HAP2)

23 augustus 2022 bijgewerkt door: Andrea Apter, University of Pennsylvania
Few interventions to improve asthma management have targeted low-income minority asthmatic adults and even fewer have focused on the real-world practice where care is provided for these patients. This project tests the effectiveness of a Patient Advocate as a practical and sustainable method of facilitating and maintaining communication between patient and provider and access to chronic care for adults with moderate or severe asthma recruited from clinics serving low-income urban neighborhoods. We compare the use of a Patient Advocate to current asthma care and test the Patient Advocate's cost-effectiveness.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

This 5 year project tests the effectiveness, sustainability, and budget impact of a patient navigator intervention to facilitate and maintain patient-provider communication and access to chronic care of moderate or severe asthma in low income minority adults with other chronic morbidities. We will recruit from a variety of clinic practices including those of an urban academic health center, a VA, and a federally qualified health center and in both English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients. The intervention is tailored to patients and their clinics, and informed by focus groups of patients and providers.

The Patient Advocate (PA), works with patients by coaching and modeling preparation for a visit with the asthma doctor, attending the visit with the permission of participant and provider, and confirming understanding of issues discussed. The PA also facilitates scheduling, obtaining insurance coverage, overcoming patients' unique social and administrative barriers to carrying out medical advice, and exchange of information between providers and patients. The PAs are recent college graduates interested in health-related or education careers, research experience, working with patients, and generally have the same race/ethnicity distribution as potential subjects.

This dissemination and implementation project refines the intervention of RC1 HL099612 for real-world practice by 1) conducting a randomized controlled trial that compares the Patient Advocate Intervention (PAI) to currently practiced guideline-based usual care; 2) carrying out the intervention in a variety of primary care and asthma specialty practices; 3) extending the observation time to a year to test its sustainability; 4) assessing patient-centered outcomes including asthma control, quality of life, ED visits, and hospitalizations; 5) assessing mediators/moderators of the PAI-asthma outcome relationship; and 6) evaluating its cost-effectiveness.

We will recruit 300 adults, each to be followed for at least 1 year with moderate or severe persistent asthma from clinics serving low-income, urban, primarily minority patients and conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to: 1) assess whether 6 months of the PAI improves asthma control relative to baseline compared with usual care (UC) and whether such a difference is sustained in the 6 months following the intervention's completion, 2) Assess whether the PAI improves other asthma outcomes (need for prednisone bursts, ED visits, hospitalizations, quality of life, FEV1) relative to baseline compared with UC at 6 months and is sustained in the 6 months following the intervention's completion, 3) examine mediators and moderators of the relationship between the intervention and outcome, 4) assess the incremental direct and indirect costs of the PAI compared to usual care and the cost-effectiveness of the PAI relative to UC for the outcomes, and 5) in post-study focus groups of providers to explore awareness of the intervention and response to the PA

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

312

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Verenigde Staten
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Verenigde Staten, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Health System

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. > 18 years of age,
  2. physician's diagnosis of asthma,
  3. prescribed an inhaled-steroid-containing medication for asthma (ensuring the patient is believed to have moderate or severe reversible airways obstruction by their physician),
  4. moderate or severe persistent asthma according to the NHLBI Guidelines,
  5. evidence of reversible airflow obstruction: (a) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% predicted at the time of screening or within the 3 years prior to this screening, and (b) improvement with bronchodilator: either (i) an increase of >15% and 200ml in FEV1 with asthma treatment over the previous 3 years or (ii) after 4 puffs of albuterol by MDI (or 2.5 mg by nebulizer), an increase in FEV1 or FVC >12% and 200 ml in FEV1 within 30 minutes,
  6. at least one appointment scheduled with the asthma physician during the 1st 6 months of participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe psychiatric or cognitive problems (e.g., obvious mania, schizophrenia, significant mental retardation) that make it impossible to understand and carryout PA activities.
  2. Unable to understand and provide informed consent,
  3. Unable to communicate in English or Spanish.
  4. Participants of the pilot study for this project are excluded

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Patient advocate
Subject works with a Patient Advocate who coaches, models, and assists with preparations for a visit with the asthma doctor; attends the visit with permission of participant and provider; and confirms understanding. The PA facilitates scheduling, obtaining insurance coverage, overcoming patients' unique social and administrative barriers to carrying out medical advice, and transfer of information between providers and patients.
Gedragsmatig: Patient Advocate
Subject works with a Patient Advocate who coaches, models, and assists with preparations for a visit with the asthma doctor; attends the visit with permission of participant and provider; and confirms understanding. The PA facilitates scheduling, obtaining insurance coverage, overcoming patients' unique social and administrative barriers to accomplishing medical advice, and transfer of information between provider and patient.
Ander: usual care
Patient receives asthma care as usual from their asthma provider
Gedragsmatig: Usual Care
Subjects receive asthma care from their proivders in the participating practices which generally follow asthma guidelines

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change in Asthma Control at One Year
Tijdsspanne: baseline and 1 year

Asthma Control Questionnaire: In a randomized controlled trial we will assess whether 6 months of the Patient Advocate Intervention improves asthma control relative to baseline compared with usual care (UC) and whether such a difference is sustained in the 6 months following the intervention's completion.

Asthma Control range is 0-6 with lower score better control (0= total control and 6 = extremetly uncontrolled. The minimally important clinical difference is 0.5. A score > 1.5 is considered inadequate control.
baseline and 1 year

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change in Emergency Department(ED) Visits at One Year
Tijdsspanne: one year
Emergency room visits in the 6 months before entry compared with emergency room visits in the 6 months prior to the one year timepoint
one year
Change in Asthma-related Quality of Life
Tijdsspanne: baseline to one year
Asthma-related quality of life will be measured with the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). This 15-item questionnaire with each item having a 7-point response scale that provides a mean summary score. A 0.5-unit change is considered clinically meaningful. the range is 1 - 7 with higher score better quality of life.
baseline to one year
Change in Hospitalizations
Tijdsspanne: one year
Participants will report hospitalizations verified if possible in participating health systems. We review records and if not available ask patient for hospititalizations over the 6 months before baseline and compare it with the record or report in the 6-months prior to one year.
one year
Risk of Prednisone Bursts
Tijdsspanne: baseline and one year
a new dose or an increase in already prescribed prednisone dose
baseline and one year
Change in Urgent Office Visit
Tijdsspanne: one year
Records or if not available patient report of an urgent office visit in the 6 months before baseline compared with record or report of urgent office visits in the 6 months prior to one year. An urgent office visit is one scheduled within 24 hours of the visit.
one year

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Andrea J Apter, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

12 december 2013

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

16 maart 2017

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

30 april 2022

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

16 oktober 2013

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

29 oktober 2013

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

30 oktober 2013

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

13 september 2022

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

23 augustus 2022

Laatst geverifieerd

1 augustus 2022

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 1R18HL116285-01 (Subsidie/contract van de Amerikaanse NIH)

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Klinische onderzoeken op Patient Advocate

Zoek naar vergelijkbare onderzoeken

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

CROs by country

CROs in China

Voorwaarden

Zeldzame ziekten

Geneesmiddelinterventies

Voedingssupplementen

Sponsor / medewerkers

Locaties

3
Abonneren