Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sildenafil at Improving Health Outcomes and Exercise Ability in People With Diastolic Heart Failure (The RELAX Study) (RELAX)

14. juli 2014 oppdatert av: Duke University

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX)

Diastolic heart failure (DHF), which affects older individuals and women at a disproportionate rate, is a condition that can lead to shortness of breath and fluid build-up in the lungs. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the medication sildenafil at improving exercise ability and health outcomes in people with DHF.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Forhold

Detaljert beskrivelse

DHF is a condition in which one of the chambers of the heart, the left ventricle, loses its ability to relax completely because the muscle has become too stiff. When this occurs, the heart is unable to properly fill with blood, which can lead to decreased blood circulation. People with DHF may experience shortness of breath and pulmonary congestion, which is an abnormal build-up of fluid in the lungs. Current treatment for DHF includes guidelines/recommendations to lower blood pressure, stop smoking, and lose weight, but there are no medications available to specifically treat DHF. Sildenafil, commonly known as Revatio or Viagra, is a medication that increases the supply of blood to the lungs and reduces the workload of the heart. Preliminary studies have shown that sildenafil may be beneficial at improving heart and lung function in people with DHF, but more research is needed to confirm these findings. The purpose of this study is to determine if sildenafil can improve exercise ability and health outcomes in people with DHF.

This 24-week study will enroll people with DHF. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sildenafil or placebo three times a day for 24 weeks. Participants will attend study visits at baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 13, and 24. At most study visits, the following procedures will occur: physical exam, medical history review, questionnaires, blood collection, 6-minute walk test to measure endurance, and an exercise test. At baseline and Week 24, participants will also undergo an electrocardiogram, which will measure the electrical activity of the heart, and a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure and an echocardiogram, which will both obtain pictures of the heart. At Weeks 3, 8, 16, and 20, study researchers will call participants to collect health information.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

216

Fase

  • Fase 3

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T - 1C8
        • Montreal Heart Institute
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, Forente stater, 85054
        • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, Forente stater, 30310
        • Morehouse School of Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forente stater, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, Forente stater, 55415
        • Minnesota Heart Failure Network
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Forente stater, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, Forente stater, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Forente stater, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, Forente stater, 84107
        • University of Utah Health Sciences Center
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, Forente stater, 05401
        • University of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous clinical diagnosis of heart failure with current New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV symptoms
  • Has experienced at least one of the following in the 12 months before study entry:

    • Hospitalization for decompensated heart failure
    • Acute treatment with intravenous loop diuretic or hemofiltration
    • Mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure greater than 15 mm Hg or left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) greater than 18 mm Hg at catheterization for dyspnea
    • Long term treatment with a loop diuretic and chronic diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography, as determined by left atrial enlargement
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50%, as determined by a clinical echocardiogram or ventriculogram in the 12 months before study entry
  • Receiving stable medical therapy in the 30 days before study entry, as determined by no addition or removal of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, or calcium channel blockers (CCB) and no change in dosage of ACE, ARBs, beta-blockers, or CCBs of more than 100%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a neuromuscular, orthopedic, or other non-cardiac condition that prevents individual from exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer or from walking in a hallway
  • Non-cardiac condition that limits life expectancy to less than 1 year at the time of study entry, based on the judgment of the physician
  • Current or anticipated future need for nitrate therapy
  • Valve disease (i.e., greater than mild aortic or mitral stenosis; greater than moderate aortic or mitral regurgitation)
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Infiltrative or inflammatory myocardial disease (e.g., amyloid, sarcoid)
  • Pericardial disease
  • Primary pulmonary arteriopathy
  • Has experienced a heart attack or unstable angina, or has undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the 60 days before study entry, or requires either PTCA or CABG at the time of study entry
  • Other clinically important causes of dyspnea, such as morbid obesity or significant lung disease, as defined by clinical judgment or use of steroids or oxygen for lung disease
  • Systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg or greater than 180 mm Hg
  • Diastolic blood pressure less than 40 mm Hg or greater than 100 mm Hg
  • Resting heart rate (HR) greater than 100 bpm
  • History of reduced ejection fraction (less than 50%)
  • Implanted metallic device that will interfere with MRI examination (in people without atrial fibrillation)
  • Severe kidney dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] less than 20 ml/min/1.73m2 by modified modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD] equation)
  • Pregnant or not using an effective form of contraception
  • Hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL
  • Taking alpha antagonists or cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, saquinavir, cimetidine, or serum protease inhibitors for HIV)
  • Retinitis pigmentosa, previous diagnosis of nonischemic optic neuropathy, untreated proliferative retinopathy, or unexplained visual disturbance
  • Sickle cell anemia, multiple myeloma, leukemia, or penile deformities that increase the risk for priapism (e.g., angulation, cavernosal fibrosis, Peyronie's disease)
  • Severe liver disease (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] level greater than three times the normal limit, alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin greater than two times the normal limit)
  • In being consistent with American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, people with dyspnea and risk factors for coronary artery disease should have had a stress test and those people with a clinically indicated stress test demonstrating significant ischemia in the 1 year before study entry will be excluded.
  • Listed for heart transplantation

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Trippel

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Placebo komparator: Placebo
Placebo 20 mg three tid for 12 weeks followed by 60 mg tid for 12 weeks
Andre navn:
  • Sukkerpille for å etterligne Sildenafil
Eksperimentell: Sildenafil
Sildenafil 20 mg three tid for 12 weeks followed by 60 mg tid for 12 weeks
Andre navn:
  • Aktiv Sildenafil

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen Uptake
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen Uptake
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 12
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk Distance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 12
6 Minute Walk Distance
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Composite Score Reflective of Clinical Status
Tidsramme: Measured at Week 24

Participants ranked sequentially with ranking stratified in one of three tiers based on:

  1. Death (lowest tier) The person with the shortest time from randomization to death is given the lowest rank within the tier.
  2. Hospitalizations due to cardiovascular or renal causes (middle tier) For patients alive, the ranking within this tier is based on time to hospitalization from randomization date. The person with the first cardiovascular or renal cause hospitalization will be given the lowest rank within the tier.
  3. Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) from baseline (highest tier)

The use of three tiers within the ranking reflects the greater adverse impact of death or cardiovascular hospitalization on clinical status without an arbitrary assignment as to the relative value of these events in relation to changes in quality of life. Rank order: 1-189 (higher values are better)

Measured at Week 24
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk Distance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
6 minute walk distance
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) Duration
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 12
To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) Duration
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 12
To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ)
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 12

The MLWHFQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure of health related quality of life (QOL) that assesses patients perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical, socioeconomic and psychological aspects of life. Patients respond to 21 items using a six-point response scale (0-5). The total summary score can range from 0-105 with a lower score reflecting better heart failure related QOL. Two sub-scale scores reflect physical (8 items) and emotional (5 items) impairment.

Total score: 0 - 105 Physical subscore: 0 - 40 Emotional subscore: 0 - 25

Change from Baseline to Week 12
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
The MLWHFQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure of health related quality of life (QOL) that assesses patients perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical, socioeconomic and psychological aspects of life. Patients respond to 21 items using a six-point response scale (0-5). The total summary score can range from 0-105 with a lower score reflecting better heart failure related QOL. Two sub-scale scores reflect physical (8 items) and emotional (5 items) impairment.
Change from Baseline to Week 24

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
MRI Left Ventricular Mass
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in LV Mass is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Left Ventricular Mass Index
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Left Ventricular Mass Index is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
An increase in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
An increase in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
An increase in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
An increase in LVEF is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Echocardiogram Left Ventricular Mass
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Left Ventricular Mass is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Medial Diastolic Elastance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Medial Diastolic Elastance is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Lateral Diastolic Elastance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Lateral Diastolic Elastance is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Medial Left Ventricular Relaxation
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
An increase in Left Ventricular relaxation is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Lateral Left Ventricular Relaxation
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
An increase in Left Ventricular relaxation is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Medial Filling Pressure
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in medial filling pressure is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Lateral Filling Pressure
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in lateral filling pressure is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
ECHO Effective Arterial Elastance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Effective Arterial Elastance is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
ECHO Systemic Vascular Resistance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Systemic Vascular Resistance is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Effective Arterial Elastance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Effective Arterial Elastance is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Systemic Vascular Resistance
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Systemic Vascular Resistance is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Aortic Thickness
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Aortic Thickness is considered an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
MRI Aortic Distensibility
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
An increase in Aortic Distensibility is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
ECHO Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
A decrease in Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure is considered to be an improvement
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Best Available Creatinine
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Best available=local lab results only when core lab results not available
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Best Available Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Best available=local lab results when core lab results not available
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cystatin C
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Uric Acid
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT Pro-BNP)
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Aldosterone
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
High Sensitivity Troponin I
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Procollagen III N-terminal Peptide
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Endothelin-1
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Collagen Type I (CITP)
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP)
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Galectin 3
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24
Furosemide-Equivalent Dose
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline to Week 24
Change from Baseline to Week 24

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. september 2008

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. september 2012

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. september 2012

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

30. september 2008

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

30. september 2008

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

1. oktober 2008

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)

23. juli 2014

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

14. juli 2014

Sist bekreftet

1. juli 2013

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Hjertefeil

Kliniske studier på Placebo

3
Abonnere