Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Adcetris (Brentuximabe Vedotin), quimioterapia combinada e radioterapia no tratamento de pacientes mais jovens com linfoma de Hodgkin nos estágios IIB, IIIB e IV

11 de novembro de 2026 atualizado por: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Adcetris (Brentuximab Vedotin), substituindo a vincristina no regime OEPA/COPDac [grupo de tratamento 3 (TG3) da Euro-Net C1] com radioterapia de nódulo envolvido para linfoma de Hodgkin (HL) pediátrico de alto risco

This pilot phase II trial studies how well giving brentuximab vedotin, combination chemotherapy, and radiation therapy works in treating younger patients with stage IIB, IIIB or IV Hodgkin lymphoma. Monoclonal antibodies, such as brentuximab vedotin, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer killing substances to them. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as etoposide, prednisone, doxorubicin hydrochloride, cyclophosphamide, and dacarbazine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill cancer cells. Giving brentuximab vedotin with combination chemotherapy may kill more cancer cells and reduce the need for radiation therapy.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ativo, não recrutando

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  • To evaluate the safety of brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, prednisone and doxorubicin hydrochloride (AEPA)/cyclophosphamide, brentuximab vedotin, prednisone and dacarbazine (CAPDac), as well as the efficacy (early complete response) after 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy in high risk patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).
  • To compare the event-free survival in high risk HL patients treated with AEPA/CAPDac to the historical control unfavorable risk 2 arm (UR2) of the St. Jude HOD99 study.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  • To estimate the number of patients with adequate response according to the definitions in the Euro-Net C1 after 2 cycles of AEPA.
  • To evaluate the safety of Adcetris (brentuximab vedotin) in the AEPA/CAPDac regimen in children with high risk HL.
  • To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0.
  • To study the association between local failure and original lymph node region and volume of radiation (patterns of treatment failure).
  • To assess patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in children with high risk HL compared to those treated on the unfavorable treatment arm of the St. Jude HOD99 study.

OUTLINE:

AEPA REGIMEN: Patients receive brentuximab vedotin on days 1, 8, and 15, etoposide on days 1 to 5, prednisone three times daily (TID) on days 1 to 15, and doxorubicin hydrochloride on days 1 and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

CAPDac REGIMEN: Patients receive cyclophosphamide on days 1 and 8, brentuximab vedotin days 1 and 8, prednisone TID on days 1 to 15, and dacarbazine on days 1 to 3. Treatment repeats every 21-28 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Beginning 2-3 weeks after CAPDac chemotherapy, patients with lymph nodes that do not go into remission after 2 courses of AEPA chemotherapy undergo radiation therapy daily, 5 days a week for 3-4 weeks.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually for 5 years.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

77

Estágio

  • Fase 2

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

  • Estados Unidos
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, Estados Unidos, 94304
        • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford University
    • Illinois
      • Peoria, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 61637
        • St. Jude Midwest Affiliate
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, Estados Unidos, 04704
        • Maine Children's Cancer Program (MCCP)
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02115
        • Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, Estados Unidos, 38105
        • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

Não mais velho que 18 anos (Filho, Adulto)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed, previously untreated CD30+ classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). (Participants receiving limited emergent radiation therapy (RT) or steroid therapy - maximum of 7 days - because of cardiopulmonary decompensation or spinal cord compression will be eligible for protocol enrollment).
  • Age ≤ 18 years at the time of diagnosis (i.e., participants are eligible until their 19th birthday).
  • Ann Arbor stage IIB, IIIB, IVA, or IVB.
  • Adequate renal function based on GFR ≥ 70 ml/min/1.73m^2 or serum creatinine adjusted for age and gender.
  • Adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN for age, and SGOT/SGPT < 2.5 x ULN for age).
  • Female participant who is post-menarchal must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test.
  • Female or male participant of reproductive potential must agree to use an effective contraceptive method throughout duration of study treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CD30 negative HL.
  • Has received prior therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, except as noted above.
  • Inadequate organ function as described above.
  • Inability or unwillingness of research participant or legal guardian / representative to give written informed consent.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Treatment

Participants receive AEPA regimen (brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, prednisone, doxorubicin), and CAPDac regimen (cyclophosphamide, brentuximab vedotin, prednisone, dacarbazine(R)). Filgrastim may be given as clinically indicated. For those with lymph nodes that do not go into remission after 2 courses of AEPA chemotherapy, radiation therapy will be given. Some participants may volunteer to complete the quality of life assessment.
Medicamento: brentuximab vedotin

Given intravenously (IV).

Outros nomes:
  • SGN-35
  • Adcetris(R)
Medicamento: etoposide

Given IV.

Outros nomes:
  • VP-16
  • Vepesid(R)
Medicamento: prednisone

Given orally (PO).

Outros nomes:
  • prednisolona
Medicamento: doxorubicin

Given IV.

Outros nomes:
  • Adriamicina(R)
Medicamento: cyclophosphamide

Given IV.

Outros nomes:
  • Cytoxan(R)
Medicamento: Dacarbazine(R)

Given IV.

Outros nomes:
  • Dimetil Triazeno Imidazol Carboximida (DTIC)
Medicamento: filgrastim

Given subcutaneously (SQ) as clinically indicated.

Outros nomes:
  • Neupógeno(R)
Outro: quality of life assessment

Quality of life assessment will be done at initial clinical visit, and during chemotherapy, completion of therapy, then at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years. It should take no more than 15-20 minutes to complete. Participation is voluntary by participating institution and by participant.

Radiação: radiation therapy

At the end of chemotherapy and recovery of blood counts, radiotherapy will be given to any involved nodes (if any) that are not in complete remission.

Outros nomes:
  • irradiação
  • radiação
  • radioterapia

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control
Prazo: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)

To determine the efficacy of 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy, the response rate for the first 32 evaluable participants enrolled was evaluated. If it shown efficacy (detect 20% increase complete rate with 80% power and 5% type I error compared with the proportion of historical control of HOD99 (NCT00145600) unfavorable risk patients had complete rate at week 8 of 17% (24/141), the response results will be reported in a national/international meeting and the study will continue to enroll for a total of 77 patients.
After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)
Percentage of Initially Enrolled Patients That Have a Complete Response at Early Response Assessment Compared to Historical Control
Prazo: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)

To determine the efficacy of 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy, the response rate for the first 32 evaluable participants enrolled was evaluated. If it shown efficacy (detect 20% increase complete rate with 80% power and 5% type I error compared with the proportion of historical control of HOD99 unfavorable risk patients had complete rate at week 8 of 17% (24/141), the response results will be reported in a national/international meeting and the study will continue to enroll for a total of 77 patients.
After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)
Complete Response Rate Estimate for All Evaluable Participants
Prazo: After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at 2 months from enrollment for each participant)

To evaluate the safety of AEPA/CAPDac, as well as the efficacy (early complete response) after 2 cycles of AEPA chemotherapy in high-risk patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL).
After the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at 2 months from enrollment for each participant)
Comparison of the Event-free (EFS) Survival in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac to the Historical Control HOD99 Unfavorable Risk 2 Arm (UR2).
Prazo: From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as the probability of survival between the date of study enrollment to the date of first event (relapsed or progressive disease, second malignancy, or death from any cause) or to last follow-up for patients without events. Under the proportional hazard model assumption, the two-sample log-rank test used to compare the EFS between HLHR13 and historical control of HOD99 unfavorable risk 2 arm (UR2).
From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Local Failure Rate in High Risk HL Patients Treated With AEPA/CAPDac.
Prazo: From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)

The local failure rate within the high-risk HL participants treated with AEPA/CAPDac will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval using appropriate methods (e.g., estimate cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks).
From start of therapy to 2 years after completion of therapy (up to 3 years after study enrollment)
Descriptive of Hematological Adverse Events
Prazo: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0.
From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)
Descriptive of Infectious Adverse Events
Prazo: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0.
From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)
Descriptive of Neuropathic Adverse Events
Prazo: From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)

To describe acute hematologic, neuropathic, and infectious toxicities as they relate to transfusion requirements, growth factor support, episodes of febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations, according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0.
From enrollment to end of therapy (approximately 8 months)
To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.3.0)
Prazo: At Diagnosis (baseline) (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 2 months) (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 4 months) (T3), completion of radiation (approximately 8 months) (T4)

Assess and compare the patient reported quality of life and symptom distress to that of patients treated on the HOD99 unfavorable risk 2 arm (UR2) using the Peds Quality of Life version 3. The QL scoring is a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Total score is the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. For both the total score and subscales the range is 0-100. The total score is the sum of all items from each subscale, over the number of items answered on the scale. The total score is the sum of all items on the scale over the number of items answer. If >50% of the items are missing the score should not be computed. If >50% are completed, impute the mean of the completed items in a scale. The Higher the score the better quality of life.
At Diagnosis (baseline) (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 2 months) (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 4 months) (T3), completion of radiation (approximately 8 months) (T4)
To Assess the Patient Reported Symptoms and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With High Risk HL Compared to Those Treated on the Unfavorable HOD99 Treatment Arm (UR2) at Multiple Time Points. (PedsQL v.4.0)
Prazo: At Diagnosis (baseline) (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 2 months) (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 4 months) (T3), completion of radiation (approximately 8 months) (T4)

Assess and compare the patient reported quality of life and symptom distress to that of patients treated on the HOD99 unfavorable risk 2 arm (UR2) using the Peds Quality of Life version 4. The QL scoring is a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Total score is the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. For both the total score and subscales the range is 0-100. The total score is the sum of all items from each subscale, over the number of items answered on the scale. The total score is the sum of all items on the scale over the number of items answer. If >50% of the items are missing the score should not be computed. If >50% are completed, impute the mean of the completed items in a scale. The Higher the score the better quality of life.
At Diagnosis (baseline) (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 2 months) (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (approximately 4 months) (T3), completion of radiation (approximately 8 months) (T4)
Response Rate
Prazo: after the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)

Response compared to the Euro-Net C1 after 2 cycles of AEPA.
after the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (at approximately 2 months after enrollment)
Patient Quality of Life (QoL)
Prazo: At various time points from diagnosis through 5 years off therapy. (up to approximately 6 years from enrollment).

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's physical emotional, social, and school functioning.

The QL scoring is a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Total score is the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. For both the total score and subscales the range is 0-100. The total score is the sum of all items from each subscale, over the number of items answered on the scale. The total score is the sum of all items on the scale over the number of items answer. If >50% of the items are missing the score should not be computed. If >50% are completed, impute the mean of the completed items in a scale. The Higher the score the better quality of life.
At various time points from diagnosis through 5 years off therapy. (up to approximately 6 years from enrollment).
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL)
Prazo: At various time points from diagnosis through 5 years off therapy. (up to approximately 6 years from enrollment)

Parent's assessment of child's physical, emotional, social and school functioning over multiple time points.

The QL scoring is a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Total score is the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. For both the total score and subscales the range is 0-100. The total score is the sum of all items from each subscale, over the number of items answered on the scale. The total score is the sum of all items on the scale over the number of items answer. If >50% of the items are missing the score should not be computed. If >50% are completed, impute the mean of the completed items in a scale. The Higher the score the better quality of life.
At various time points from diagnosis through 5 years off therapy. (up to approximately 6 years from enrollment)
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points
Prazo: At various time points from diagnosis through 5 years off therapy. (up to approximately 6 years from enrollment)

The correlation of agreement between patient and parent Quality of Life is calculated by using the Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, which considers only the record with both parent and patient data.

The QL scoring is a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Total score is the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. For both the total score and subscales the range is 0-100. The total score is the sum of all items from each subscale, over the number of items answered on the scale. The total score is the sum of all items on the scale over the number of items answer. If >50% of the items are missing the score should not be computed. If >50% are completed, impute the mean of the completed items in a scale. The Higher the score the better quality of life.
At various time points from diagnosis through 5 years off therapy. (up to approximately 6 years from enrollment)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Colaboradores

Seagen Inc.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Matt Ehrhardt, MD, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Links úteis

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

12 de agosto de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

16 de novembro de 2020

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de maio de 2028

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

6 de agosto de 2013

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

8 de agosto de 2013

Primeira postagem (Estimado)

12 de agosto de 2013

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

13 de novembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

11 de novembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de novembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • HLHR13
  • NCI-2013-01123 (Identificador de registro: NCI Clinical Trial Registration Program)

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Sim

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever