Melhorando a comunicação centrada no paciente no câncer de mama por meio de intervenções do paciente e do profissional de saúde (SHARES)
Melhorando a comunicação centrada no paciente no câncer de mama: um RCT de um sistema de engajamento de decisão compartilhada (SHARES)
This trial studies the effectiveness of two interventions on patient reported outcomes of patient centered communication and decision making about breast cancer treatment. The first intervention consists of enhancements to an existing patient-facing breast cancer treatment decision tool called iCanDecide that supports the management of worry, distress, and anxiety as compared to an existing tool. The second intervention consists of a clinician dashboard that populates information after patients view either website regarding any ongoing issues or concerns.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
- Câncer de Mama Anatômico Estágio I AJCC v8
- Câncer de mama em estágio anatômico IA AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Estágio Anatômico IB AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Anatômico Estágio II AJCC v8
- Câncer de mama estágio anatômico IIA AJCC v8
- Câncer de mama estágio anatômico IIB AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Anatômico Estágio III AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Anatômico Estágio IIIA AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Anatômico Estágio IIIB AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Anatômico Estágio IIIC AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Estágio I Prognóstico AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Estágio IA Prognóstico AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Estágio IB Prognóstico AJCC v8
- Prognóstico Câncer de Mama Estágio II AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Estágio IIA Prognóstico AJCC v8
- Prognóstico Câncer de Mama Estágio IIB AJCC v8
- Prognóstico Câncer de Mama Estágio III AJCC v8
- Prognóstico Câncer de Mama Estágio IIIA AJCC v8
- Prognóstico Câncer de Mama Estágio IIIB AJCC v8
- Prognóstico Câncer de Mama Estágio IIIC AJCC v8
- Câncer de mama em estágio anatômico 0 AJCC v8
- Câncer de Mama Estágio 0 Prognóstico AJCC v8
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
The primary and key secondary objectives of the study:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-emotional support enhancement [ESE]) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-standard [S]) resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.
II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-ESE) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-S), resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.
II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.
OUTLINE: This study is a multi-level trial of SHaDES that has two interventions in a factorial or crossed design: 1) an individually randomized patient-level randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the standard version (iCanDecide-S) vs. a version with innovative emotional support enhancements (iCanDecide-ESE), and 2) a clinic-level stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to test a Clinician Dashboard (CDB). Twenty-five surgical practices will be recruited for participation. Practices will be randomized to the timing of the CDB intervention, with some practices initiating the CDB intervention right away, while others may initiate the CDB later or perhaps be randomized to "no CDB" period. Clinicians will be asked to use the CDB beginning in the time period to which their practice was randomized and continuing to the end of the study. After registration, clinicians are followed up at 9 and 18 months. After a patient is registered, the patient will be randomized to one of two arms:
ARM I: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.
ARM II: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.
After study registration, patients are followed up at 4-5 weeks and 9 months.
Patients will be enrolled at participating clinics during the full duration of the study and all enrolled patients will receive a version of the decision support tool (iCanDecide-S; iCanDecide-ESE). These patient-level activities are not influenced by the timing of the practice-level randomization to the CDB.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
California
-
Vallejo, California, Estados Unidos, 94589
- Kaiser Permanente-Vallejo
-
-
Delaware
-
Newark, Delaware, Estados Unidos, 19713
- Helen F Graham Cancer Center
-
Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, Estados Unidos, 19971
- Beebe Health Campus
-
-
Georgia
-
Savannah, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 31405
- Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
-
-
Hawaii
-
Honolulu, Hawaii, Estados Unidos, 96819
- Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center
-
-
Illinois
-
Mount Vernon, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 62864
- SSM Health Good Samaritan
-
-
Maine
-
Scarborough, Maine, Estados Unidos, 04074
- Maine Medical Center- Scarborough Campus
-
-
Michigan
-
Grand Rapids, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 49503
- Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals - Butterworth Hospital
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 49007
- West Michigan Cancer Center
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 49048
- Ascension Borgess Hospital
-
-
New York
-
Mount Kisco, New York, Estados Unidos, 10549
- Northern Westchester Hospital
-
New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10032
- NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
The Bronx, New York, Estados Unidos, 10461
- Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus
-
-
North Carolina
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, Estados Unidos, 27403
- Novant Health Breast Surgery - Greensboro
-
-
North Dakota
-
Bismarck, North Dakota, Estados Unidos, 58501
- Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
-
Fargo, North Dakota, Estados Unidos, 58122
- Sanford Broadway Medical Center
-
-
Ohio
-
Chillicothe, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 45601
- Adena Regional Medical Center
-
Westerville, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 43081
- Saint Ann's Hospital
-
Zanesville, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 43701
- Genesis Healthcare System Cancer Care Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, Estados Unidos, 38120
- Baptist Memorial Hospital for Women
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Appleton, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 54911
- ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center
-
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 54701
- Marshfield Medical Center-EC Cancer Center
-
Grafton, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 53024
- Aurora Cancer Care-Grafton
-
La Crosse, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 54601
- Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
-
Wausau, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 54401
- Aspirus Regional Cancer Center
-
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 53226
- Ascension Medical Group Southeast Wisconsin - Mayfair Road
-
West Allis, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 53227
- Aurora West Allis Medical Center
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Filho
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- PATIENT ELIGIBILITY
- Women newly diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer. Although men are recommended to undergo surgery to treat breast cancer, male breast cancer is relatively rare and decision making for breast cancer surgery is quite different between men and women
- Planning breast surgery as a component of their definitive treatment within 5 weeks of registration
- Receives care from a clinician and at a practice that has consented to participate in the clinician dashboard practice-level intervention. Practices/clinicians will consent initially at the initiation of the study. Patients will then be identified and recruited in those practices. If a practice has more than one clinician doing breast surgery, patients will be recruited from those clinicians who consent (one or more). Patients of clinicians who have not consented will not be eligible
- Patients must be able to speak English or Spanish with the fluency required to have a direct discussion around treatment decision-making (i.e. without interpreter)
- Age 21-84 years
- CLINICIAN STAKEHOLDER (SURGEONS AND CLINIC STAFF) ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
- Clinicians eligible for this study include: breast surgeons and their designee(s) (e.g., physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or nurses) that participate in the treatment decision-making process. At least one surgical oncologist at a practice must agree to participate and sign consent. S/he may then also identify a nurse, physician assistant (PA) or advanced practice provider (APP) with whom s/he works that is involved in the delivery of the care of the same patients to participate. Henceforth, in this protocol they will be referred to as "clinicians"
- Clinicians must agree to have their patients recruited for the entire time the study is open at their practice, which will include time periods in which the clinicians will and time periods in which they will not have access to the CDB
- INSTITUTION ELIGIBILITY:
- Practices that annually provide surgical care for over 100 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer are eligible to participate in this study
- Eligible practices must have at least one surgical oncologist who agrees to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are visually impaired are not eligible, as they must be able to access the study intervention on a website at home or in clinic and view the decision aid
- Patients with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss) are not eligible for this study
- Practices currently enrolling to Alliance A231701CD are not eligible to participate in this study
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Pesquisa de serviços de saúde
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição fatorial
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm I: (iCanDecide - ESE)
Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration. |
Ancillary studies Participate in interview Undergo surgery Ancillary studies Utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website |
|
Comparador Ativo: Arm II: (iCanDecide - S)
Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration. |
Ancillary studies Participate in interview Undergo surgery Ancillary studies Utilize the iCanDecide - S website |
|
Experimental: Clinics 1-5: (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 1-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
Experimental: Clinics 6-8 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 10-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
Experimental: Clinics 9-11 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 20-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
Experimental: Clinics 12-14 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 30-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
Experimental: Clinics 15-17 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 40-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
Experimental: Clinics 18-20 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 50-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
Comparador Ativo: Clinics 21-25 (usual care)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and continue to provide breast cancer surgical care per their usual care. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize usual care |
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Knowledge About Risks and Benefits of Local Regional Treatment
Prazo: 5 weeks
|
Will be defined as the mean percentage of correct answers (range: 0-100%) from a 5-item scale previously developed and pilot tested where higher percentages indicate increased knowledge of treatment risks and benefits of local regional treatment. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous primary outcome measure patient knowledge. |
5 weeks
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Self-efficacy in Dealing With Breast Cancer
Prazo: 5 weeks
|
Will be defined as the composite score obtained from the 11-item (each rated on a 5-point Likert scale: "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree") validated scale designed to assess breast cancer patients' overall feelings of control of their cancer and worry about their cancer (range: 11 to 55); higher scores indicate increased self-efficacy. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient self-efficacy. |
5 weeks
|
|
Patient Cancer Worry
Prazo: 5 weeks
|
Will be defined as the total score obtained from the 8-item (each rated on a 4-point Likert scale: "never" to "almost always") validated Cancer Worry Scale assessing the degree of cancer-related worry (range: 8 to 40); higher scores indicate more frequent worries about cancer. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient cancer worry. |
5 weeks
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Cadeira de estudo: Sarah T. Hawley, PhD, MPH, University of Michigan School of Medicine and Public Health
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Hawley ST, Kidwell KM, Jagsi R, Barber AK, Wills R, Chow SL, Kour O, Segovia D, Abrahamse P, Resnicow K, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Hofer TP, Neuman HB. Evaluating a shared decision engagement system in the NCI community oncology research program: a multi-level RCT. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2026 Sep 28:pkag100. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkag100. Online ahead of print.
- Hawley ST, Kidwell K, Zahrieh D, McCarthy A, Wills R, Rankin A, Hofer T, Chow S, Jagsi R, Neuman H. Improving patient-centered communication in breast cancer: a study protocol for a multilevel intervention of a shared treatment deliberation system (SharES) within the NCI community oncology research program (NCORP) (Alliance A231901CD). Trials. 2023 Jan 6;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07048-4.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
- Neoplasias por local
- Neoplasias
- Neoplasias por Tipo Histológico
- Neoplasias Glandulares e Epiteliais
- Doenças de pele
- Doenças da mama
- Carcinoma
- Neoplasias da Mama
- Carcinoma in situ
- Doenças da Pele e do Tecido Conjuntivo
- Carcinoma de Mama In Situ
- Administração de Serviços de Saúde
- Qualidade, acesso e avaliação da assistência médica
- Técnicas de investigação
- Métodos epidemiológicos
- Coleta de dados
- Mecanismos de avaliação de saúde
- Qualidade de assistência médica
- Saúde pública
- Meio ambiente e saúde pública
- Diretrizes como tópico
- Garantia de qualidade, assistência médica
- Entrevistas como tópico
- Diretrizes de prática como tópico
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- A231901CD
- NCI-2020-06176 (Identificador de registro: NCI Clinical Trial Reporting Program)
- UG1CA189823 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)
- R01CA237046 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .