- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT04549571
환자 및 제공자 개입을 통한 유방암 환자 중심 의사소통 개선 (SHARES)
유방암에서 환자 중심 의사소통 개선: 공유 결정 참여 시스템(SHARES)의 RCT
This trial studies the effectiveness of two interventions on patient reported outcomes of patient centered communication and decision making about breast cancer treatment. The first intervention consists of enhancements to an existing patient-facing breast cancer treatment decision tool called iCanDecide that supports the management of worry, distress, and anxiety as compared to an existing tool. The second intervention consists of a clinician dashboard that populates information after patients view either website regarding any ongoing issues or concerns.
연구 개요
상태
정황
- 해부학적 1기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 IA기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 IB기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 II기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 IIA기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 IIB기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 III기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 IIIA기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 IIIB기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 병기 IIIC 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 I기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 IA기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 IB기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 II기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 IIA기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 IIB기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 III기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 IIIA기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 IIIB기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 IIIC기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 해부학적 0기 유방암 AJCC v8
- 예후 0기 유방암 AJCC v8
상세 설명
The primary and key secondary objectives of the study:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-emotional support enhancement [ESE]) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-standard [S]) resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.
II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-ESE) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-S), resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.
II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.
OUTLINE: This study is a multi-level trial of SHaDES that has two interventions in a factorial or crossed design: 1) an individually randomized patient-level randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the standard version (iCanDecide-S) vs. a version with innovative emotional support enhancements (iCanDecide-ESE), and 2) a clinic-level stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to test a Clinician Dashboard (CDB). Twenty-five surgical practices will be recruited for participation. Practices will be randomized to the timing of the CDB intervention, with some practices initiating the CDB intervention right away, while others may initiate the CDB later or perhaps be randomized to "no CDB" period. Clinicians will be asked to use the CDB beginning in the time period to which their practice was randomized and continuing to the end of the study. After registration, clinicians are followed up at 9 and 18 months. After a patient is registered, the patient will be randomized to one of two arms:
ARM I: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.
ARM II: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.
After study registration, patients are followed up at 4-5 weeks and 9 months.
Patients will be enrolled at participating clinics during the full duration of the study and all enrolled patients will receive a version of the decision support tool (iCanDecide-S; iCanDecide-ESE). These patient-level activities are not influenced by the timing of the practice-level randomization to the CDB.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
California
-
Vallejo, California, 미국, 94589
- Kaiser Permanente-Vallejo
-
-
Delaware
-
Newark, Delaware, 미국, 19713
- Helen F Graham Cancer Center
-
Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, 미국, 19971
- Beebe Health Campus
-
-
Georgia
-
Savannah, Georgia, 미국, 31405
- Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
-
-
Hawaii
-
Honolulu, Hawaii, 미국, 96819
- Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center
-
-
Illinois
-
Mount Vernon, Illinois, 미국, 62864
- SSM Health Good Samaritan
-
-
Maine
-
Scarborough, Maine, 미국, 04074
- Maine Medical Center- Scarborough Campus
-
-
Michigan
-
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 미국, 49503
- Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals - Butterworth Hospital
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 미국, 49007
- West Michigan Cancer Center
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 미국, 49048
- Ascension Borgess Hospital
-
-
New York
-
Mount Kisco, New York, 미국, 10549
- Northern Westchester Hospital
-
New York, New York, 미국, 10032
- NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
The Bronx, New York, 미국, 10461
- Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus
-
-
North Carolina
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, 미국, 27403
- Novant Health Breast Surgery - Greensboro
-
-
North Dakota
-
Bismarck, North Dakota, 미국, 58501
- Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
-
Fargo, North Dakota, 미국, 58122
- Sanford Broadway Medical Center
-
-
Ohio
-
Chillicothe, Ohio, 미국, 45601
- Adena Regional Medical Center
-
Westerville, Ohio, 미국, 43081
- Saint Ann's Hospital
-
Zanesville, Ohio, 미국, 43701
- Genesis Healthcare System Cancer Care Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, 미국, 38120
- Baptist Memorial Hospital for Women
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Appleton, Wisconsin, 미국, 54911
- ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center
-
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 미국, 54701
- Marshfield Medical Center-EC Cancer Center
-
Grafton, Wisconsin, 미국, 53024
- Aurora Cancer Care-Grafton
-
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 미국, 54601
- Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
-
Wausau, Wisconsin, 미국, 54401
- Aspirus Regional Cancer Center
-
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 미국, 53226
- Ascension Medical Group Southeast Wisconsin - Mayfair Road
-
West Allis, Wisconsin, 미국, 53227
- Aurora West Allis Medical Center
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 어린이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- PATIENT ELIGIBILITY
- Women newly diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer. Although men are recommended to undergo surgery to treat breast cancer, male breast cancer is relatively rare and decision making for breast cancer surgery is quite different between men and women
- Planning breast surgery as a component of their definitive treatment within 5 weeks of registration
- Receives care from a clinician and at a practice that has consented to participate in the clinician dashboard practice-level intervention. Practices/clinicians will consent initially at the initiation of the study. Patients will then be identified and recruited in those practices. If a practice has more than one clinician doing breast surgery, patients will be recruited from those clinicians who consent (one or more). Patients of clinicians who have not consented will not be eligible
- Patients must be able to speak English or Spanish with the fluency required to have a direct discussion around treatment decision-making (i.e. without interpreter)
- Age 21-84 years
- CLINICIAN STAKEHOLDER (SURGEONS AND CLINIC STAFF) ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
- Clinicians eligible for this study include: breast surgeons and their designee(s) (e.g., physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or nurses) that participate in the treatment decision-making process. At least one surgical oncologist at a practice must agree to participate and sign consent. S/he may then also identify a nurse, physician assistant (PA) or advanced practice provider (APP) with whom s/he works that is involved in the delivery of the care of the same patients to participate. Henceforth, in this protocol they will be referred to as "clinicians"
- Clinicians must agree to have their patients recruited for the entire time the study is open at their practice, which will include time periods in which the clinicians will and time periods in which they will not have access to the CDB
- INSTITUTION ELIGIBILITY:
- Practices that annually provide surgical care for over 100 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer are eligible to participate in this study
- Eligible practices must have at least one surgical oncologist who agrees to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are visually impaired are not eligible, as they must be able to access the study intervention on a website at home or in clinic and view the decision aid
- Patients with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss) are not eligible for this study
- Practices currently enrolling to Alliance A231701CD are not eligible to participate in this study
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 요인 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Arm I: (iCanDecide - ESE)
Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration. |
Ancillary studies Participate in interview Undergo surgery Ancillary studies Utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website |
|
활성 비교기: Arm II: (iCanDecide - S)
Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration. |
Ancillary studies Participate in interview Undergo surgery Ancillary studies Utilize the iCanDecide - S website |
|
실험적: Clinics 1-5: (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 1-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
실험적: Clinics 6-8 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 10-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
실험적: Clinics 9-11 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 20-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
실험적: Clinics 12-14 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 30-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
실험적: Clinics 15-17 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 40-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
실험적: Clinics 18-20 (CDB)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 50-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize the CDB |
|
활성 비교기: Clinics 21-25 (usual care)
Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and continue to provide breast cancer surgical care per their usual care. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes. |
Participate in interview Ancillary studies Receive training Utilize usual care |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Knowledge About Risks and Benefits of Local Regional Treatment
기간: 5 weeks
|
Will be defined as the mean percentage of correct answers (range: 0-100%) from a 5-item scale previously developed and pilot tested where higher percentages indicate increased knowledge of treatment risks and benefits of local regional treatment. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous primary outcome measure patient knowledge. |
5 weeks
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Self-efficacy in Dealing With Breast Cancer
기간: 5 weeks
|
Will be defined as the composite score obtained from the 11-item (each rated on a 5-point Likert scale: "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree") validated scale designed to assess breast cancer patients' overall feelings of control of their cancer and worry about their cancer (range: 11 to 55); higher scores indicate increased self-efficacy. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient self-efficacy. |
5 weeks
|
|
Patient Cancer Worry
기간: 5 weeks
|
Will be defined as the total score obtained from the 8-item (each rated on a 4-point Likert scale: "never" to "almost always") validated Cancer Worry Scale assessing the degree of cancer-related worry (range: 8 to 40); higher scores indicate more frequent worries about cancer. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient cancer worry. |
5 weeks
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 연구 의자: Sarah T. Hawley, PhD, MPH, University of Michigan School of Medicine and Public Health
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Hawley ST, Kidwell KM, Jagsi R, Barber AK, Wills R, Chow SL, Kour O, Segovia D, Abrahamse P, Resnicow K, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Hofer TP, Neuman HB. Evaluating a shared decision engagement system in the NCI community oncology research program: a multi-level RCT. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2026 Sep 28:pkag100. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkag100. Online ahead of print.
- Hawley ST, Kidwell K, Zahrieh D, McCarthy A, Wills R, Rankin A, Hofer T, Chow S, Jagsi R, Neuman H. Improving patient-centered communication in breast cancer: a study protocol for a multilevel intervention of a shared treatment deliberation system (SharES) within the NCI community oncology research program (NCORP) (Alliance A231901CD). Trials. 2023 Jan 6;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07048-4.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- A231901CD
- NCI-2020-06176 (레지스트리 식별자: NCI Clinical Trial Reporting Program)
- UG1CA189823 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)
- R01CA237046 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .