이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

환자 및 제공자 개입을 통한 유방암 환자 중심 의사소통 개선 (SHARES)

2026년 10월 26일 업데이트: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology

유방암에서 환자 중심 의사소통 개선: 공유 결정 참여 시스템(SHARES)의 RCT

This trial studies the effectiveness of two interventions on patient reported outcomes of patient centered communication and decision making about breast cancer treatment. The first intervention consists of enhancements to an existing patient-facing breast cancer treatment decision tool called iCanDecide that supports the management of worry, distress, and anxiety as compared to an existing tool. The second intervention consists of a clinician dashboard that populates information after patients view either website regarding any ongoing issues or concerns.

연구 개요

상세 설명

The primary and key secondary objectives of the study:

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-emotional support enhancement [ESE]) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-standard [S]) resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.

II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-ESE) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-S), resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.

II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.

OUTLINE: This study is a multi-level trial of SHaDES that has two interventions in a factorial or crossed design: 1) an individually randomized patient-level randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the standard version (iCanDecide-S) vs. a version with innovative emotional support enhancements (iCanDecide-ESE), and 2) a clinic-level stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to test a Clinician Dashboard (CDB). Twenty-five surgical practices will be recruited for participation. Practices will be randomized to the timing of the CDB intervention, with some practices initiating the CDB intervention right away, while others may initiate the CDB later or perhaps be randomized to "no CDB" period. Clinicians will be asked to use the CDB beginning in the time period to which their practice was randomized and continuing to the end of the study. After registration, clinicians are followed up at 9 and 18 months. After a patient is registered, the patient will be randomized to one of two arms:

ARM I: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

ARM II: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

After study registration, patients are followed up at 4-5 weeks and 9 months.

Patients will be enrolled at participating clinics during the full duration of the study and all enrolled patients will receive a version of the decision support tool (iCanDecide-S; iCanDecide-ESE). These patient-level activities are not influenced by the timing of the practice-level randomization to the CDB.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

614

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • California
      • Vallejo, California, 미국, 94589
        • Kaiser Permanente-Vallejo
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, 미국, 19713
        • Helen F Graham Cancer Center
      • Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, 미국, 19971
        • Beebe Health Campus
    • Georgia
      • Savannah, Georgia, 미국, 31405
        • Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, 미국, 96819
        • Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Mount Vernon, Illinois, 미국, 62864
        • SSM Health Good Samaritan
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, 미국, 04074
        • Maine Medical Center- Scarborough Campus
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, 미국, 49503
        • Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals - Butterworth Hospital
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, 미국, 49007
        • West Michigan Cancer Center
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, 미국, 49048
        • Ascension Borgess Hospital
    • New York
      • Mount Kisco, New York, 미국, 10549
        • Northern Westchester Hospital
      • New York, New York, 미국, 10032
        • NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • The Bronx, New York, 미국, 10461
        • Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus
    • North Carolina
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, 미국, 27403
        • Novant Health Breast Surgery - Greensboro
    • North Dakota
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, 미국, 58501
        • Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
      • Fargo, North Dakota, 미국, 58122
        • Sanford Broadway Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Chillicothe, Ohio, 미국, 45601
        • Adena Regional Medical Center
      • Westerville, Ohio, 미국, 43081
        • Saint Ann's Hospital
      • Zanesville, Ohio, 미국, 43701
        • Genesis Healthcare System Cancer Care Center
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, 미국, 38120
        • Baptist Memorial Hospital for Women
    • Wisconsin
      • Appleton, Wisconsin, 미국, 54911
        • ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center
      • Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 미국, 54701
        • Marshfield Medical Center-EC Cancer Center
      • Grafton, Wisconsin, 미국, 53024
        • Aurora Cancer Care-Grafton
      • La Crosse, Wisconsin, 미국, 54601
        • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
      • Wausau, Wisconsin, 미국, 54401
        • Aspirus Regional Cancer Center
      • Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 미국, 53226
        • Ascension Medical Group Southeast Wisconsin - Mayfair Road
      • West Allis, Wisconsin, 미국, 53227
        • Aurora West Allis Medical Center

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이
  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

여성

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENT ELIGIBILITY
  • Women newly diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer. Although men are recommended to undergo surgery to treat breast cancer, male breast cancer is relatively rare and decision making for breast cancer surgery is quite different between men and women
  • Planning breast surgery as a component of their definitive treatment within 5 weeks of registration
  • Receives care from a clinician and at a practice that has consented to participate in the clinician dashboard practice-level intervention. Practices/clinicians will consent initially at the initiation of the study. Patients will then be identified and recruited in those practices. If a practice has more than one clinician doing breast surgery, patients will be recruited from those clinicians who consent (one or more). Patients of clinicians who have not consented will not be eligible
  • Patients must be able to speak English or Spanish with the fluency required to have a direct discussion around treatment decision-making (i.e. without interpreter)
  • Age 21-84 years
  • CLINICIAN STAKEHOLDER (SURGEONS AND CLINIC STAFF) ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
  • Clinicians eligible for this study include: breast surgeons and their designee(s) (e.g., physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or nurses) that participate in the treatment decision-making process. At least one surgical oncologist at a practice must agree to participate and sign consent. S/he may then also identify a nurse, physician assistant (PA) or advanced practice provider (APP) with whom s/he works that is involved in the delivery of the care of the same patients to participate. Henceforth, in this protocol they will be referred to as "clinicians"
  • Clinicians must agree to have their patients recruited for the entire time the study is open at their practice, which will include time periods in which the clinicians will and time periods in which they will not have access to the CDB
  • INSTITUTION ELIGIBILITY:
  • Practices that annually provide surgical care for over 100 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer are eligible to participate in this study
  • Eligible practices must have at least one surgical oncologist who agrees to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are visually impaired are not eligible, as they must be able to access the study intervention on a website at home or in clinic and view the decision aid
  • Patients with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss) are not eligible for this study
  • Practices currently enrolling to Alliance A231701CD are not eligible to participate in this study

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 요인 할당
  • 마스킹: 더블

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Arm I: (iCanDecide - ESE)

Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

Ancillary studies

Participate in interview

Undergo surgery

Ancillary studies

Utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website

활성 비교기: Arm II: (iCanDecide - S)

Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

Ancillary studies

Participate in interview

Undergo surgery

Ancillary studies

Utilize the iCanDecide - S website

실험적: Clinics 1-5: (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 1-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

실험적: Clinics 6-8 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 10-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

실험적: Clinics 9-11 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 20-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

실험적: Clinics 12-14 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 30-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

실험적: Clinics 15-17 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 40-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

실험적: Clinics 18-20 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 50-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

활성 비교기: Clinics 21-25 (usual care)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and continue to provide breast cancer surgical care per their usual care. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize usual care

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Patient Knowledge About Risks and Benefits of Local Regional Treatment
기간: 5 weeks

Will be defined as the mean percentage of correct answers (range: 0-100%) from a 5-item scale previously developed and pilot tested where higher percentages indicate increased knowledge of treatment risks and benefits of local regional treatment. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous primary outcome measure patient knowledge.

5 weeks

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Patient Self-efficacy in Dealing With Breast Cancer
기간: 5 weeks

Will be defined as the composite score obtained from the 11-item (each rated on a 5-point Likert scale: "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree") validated scale designed to assess breast cancer patients' overall feelings of control of their cancer and worry about their cancer (range: 11 to 55); higher scores indicate increased self-efficacy. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient self-efficacy.

5 weeks
Patient Cancer Worry
기간: 5 weeks

Will be defined as the total score obtained from the 8-item (each rated on a 4-point Likert scale: "never" to "almost always") validated Cancer Worry Scale assessing the degree of cancer-related worry (range: 8 to 40); higher scores indicate more frequent worries about cancer. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient cancer worry.

5 weeks

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 연구 의자: Sarah T. Hawley, PhD, MPH, University of Michigan School of Medicine and Public Health

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2021년 2월 16일

기본 완료 (실제)

2024년 5월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2024년 7월 12일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2020년 9월 9일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2020년 9월 9일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 9월 16일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 9일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 10월 26일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 10월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다