Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Migliorare la comunicazione centrata sul paziente nel cancro al seno attraverso interventi del paziente e del fornitore (SHARES)

26 ottobre 2026 aggiornato da: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology

Migliorare la comunicazione centrata sul paziente nel cancro al seno: un RCT di un sistema di impegno decisionale condiviso (SHARES)

This trial studies the effectiveness of two interventions on patient reported outcomes of patient centered communication and decision making about breast cancer treatment. The first intervention consists of enhancements to an existing patient-facing breast cancer treatment decision tool called iCanDecide that supports the management of worry, distress, and anxiety as compared to an existing tool. The second intervention consists of a clinician dashboard that populates information after patients view either website regarding any ongoing issues or concerns.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

The primary and key secondary objectives of the study:

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-emotional support enhancement [ESE]) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-standard [S]) resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.

II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient knowledge about locoregional treatment risks and benefits.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To demonstrate that the enhanced iCanDecide (iCanDecide-ESE) intervention is more effective than the standard version (iCanDecide-S), resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.

II. To demonstrate that the activation of the clinician dashboard (CDB) is more effective than not using a CDB, resulting in higher patient-reported breast cancer self-efficacy and lower patient reported cancer worry.

OUTLINE: This study is a multi-level trial of SHaDES that has two interventions in a factorial or crossed design: 1) an individually randomized patient-level randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the standard version (iCanDecide-S) vs. a version with innovative emotional support enhancements (iCanDecide-ESE), and 2) a clinic-level stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to test a Clinician Dashboard (CDB). Twenty-five surgical practices will be recruited for participation. Practices will be randomized to the timing of the CDB intervention, with some practices initiating the CDB intervention right away, while others may initiate the CDB later or perhaps be randomized to "no CDB" period. Clinicians will be asked to use the CDB beginning in the time period to which their practice was randomized and continuing to the end of the study. After registration, clinicians are followed up at 9 and 18 months. After a patient is registered, the patient will be randomized to one of two arms:

ARM I: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

ARM II: Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

After study registration, patients are followed up at 4-5 weeks and 9 months.

Patients will be enrolled at participating clinics during the full duration of the study and all enrolled patients will receive a version of the decision support tool (iCanDecide-S; iCanDecide-ESE). These patient-level activities are not influenced by the timing of the practice-level randomization to the CDB.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

614

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • California
      • Vallejo, California, Stati Uniti, 94589
        • Kaiser Permanente-Vallejo
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, Stati Uniti, 19713
        • Helen F Graham Cancer Center
      • Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, Stati Uniti, 19971
        • Beebe Health Campus
    • Georgia
      • Savannah, Georgia, Stati Uniti, 31405
        • Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, Stati Uniti, 96819
        • Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Mount Vernon, Illinois, Stati Uniti, 62864
        • SSM Health Good Samaritan
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, Stati Uniti, 04074
        • Maine Medical Center- Scarborough Campus
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, Stati Uniti, 49503
        • Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals - Butterworth Hospital
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, Stati Uniti, 49007
        • West Michigan Cancer Center
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, Stati Uniti, 49048
        • Ascension Borgess Hospital
    • New York
      • Mount Kisco, New York, Stati Uniti, 10549
        • Northern Westchester Hospital
      • New York, New York, Stati Uniti, 10032
        • NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • The Bronx, New York, Stati Uniti, 10461
        • Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus
    • North Carolina
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 27403
        • Novant Health Breast Surgery - Greensboro
    • North Dakota
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, Stati Uniti, 58501
        • Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
      • Fargo, North Dakota, Stati Uniti, 58122
        • Sanford Broadway Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Chillicothe, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 45601
        • Adena Regional Medical Center
      • Westerville, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 43081
        • Saint Ann's Hospital
      • Zanesville, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 43701
        • Genesis Healthcare System Cancer Care Center
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, Stati Uniti, 38120
        • Baptist Memorial Hospital for Women
    • Wisconsin
      • Appleton, Wisconsin, Stati Uniti, 54911
        • ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center
      • Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Stati Uniti, 54701
        • Marshfield Medical Center-EC Cancer Center
      • Grafton, Wisconsin, Stati Uniti, 53024
        • Aurora Cancer Care-Grafton
      • La Crosse, Wisconsin, Stati Uniti, 54601
        • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
      • Wausau, Wisconsin, Stati Uniti, 54401
        • Aspirus Regional Cancer Center
      • Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, Stati Uniti, 53226
        • Ascension Medical Group Southeast Wisconsin - Mayfair Road
      • West Allis, Wisconsin, Stati Uniti, 53227
        • Aurora West Allis Medical Center

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Femmina

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENT ELIGIBILITY
  • Women newly diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer. Although men are recommended to undergo surgery to treat breast cancer, male breast cancer is relatively rare and decision making for breast cancer surgery is quite different between men and women
  • Planning breast surgery as a component of their definitive treatment within 5 weeks of registration
  • Receives care from a clinician and at a practice that has consented to participate in the clinician dashboard practice-level intervention. Practices/clinicians will consent initially at the initiation of the study. Patients will then be identified and recruited in those practices. If a practice has more than one clinician doing breast surgery, patients will be recruited from those clinicians who consent (one or more). Patients of clinicians who have not consented will not be eligible
  • Patients must be able to speak English or Spanish with the fluency required to have a direct discussion around treatment decision-making (i.e. without interpreter)
  • Age 21-84 years
  • CLINICIAN STAKEHOLDER (SURGEONS AND CLINIC STAFF) ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
  • Clinicians eligible for this study include: breast surgeons and their designee(s) (e.g., physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or nurses) that participate in the treatment decision-making process. At least one surgical oncologist at a practice must agree to participate and sign consent. S/he may then also identify a nurse, physician assistant (PA) or advanced practice provider (APP) with whom s/he works that is involved in the delivery of the care of the same patients to participate. Henceforth, in this protocol they will be referred to as "clinicians"
  • Clinicians must agree to have their patients recruited for the entire time the study is open at their practice, which will include time periods in which the clinicians will and time periods in which they will not have access to the CDB
  • INSTITUTION ELIGIBILITY:
  • Practices that annually provide surgical care for over 100 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer are eligible to participate in this study
  • Eligible practices must have at least one surgical oncologist who agrees to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are visually impaired are not eligible, as they must be able to access the study intervention on a website at home or in clinic and view the decision aid
  • Patients with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss) are not eligible for this study
  • Practices currently enrolling to Alliance A231701CD are not eligible to participate in this study

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione fattoriale
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Arm I: (iCanDecide - ESE)

Patients utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

Ancillary studies

Participate in interview

Undergo surgery

Ancillary studies

Utilize the iCanDecide - ESE website

Comparatore attivo: Arm II: (iCanDecide - S)

Patients utilize the iCanDecide - S website, then undergo surgery within 5 weeks of registration. Patients may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes at 9-12 months post registration.

Ancillary studies

Participate in interview

Undergo surgery

Ancillary studies

Utilize the iCanDecide - S website

Sperimentale: Clinics 1-5: (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 1-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

Sperimentale: Clinics 6-8 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 10-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

Sperimentale: Clinics 9-11 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 20-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

Sperimentale: Clinics 12-14 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 30-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

Sperimentale: Clinics 15-17 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 40-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

Sperimentale: Clinics 18-20 (CDB)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and utilize the CDB over weeks 50-60. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize the CDB

Comparatore attivo: Clinics 21-25 (usual care)

Beginning 4 weeks before the practice begins use of the CDB, clinicians receive training on how to use the CDB and continue to provide breast cancer surgical care per their usual care. Clinicians may also participate in an audio-recorded phone interview over 20 minutes.

Participate in interview

Ancillary studies

Receive training

Utilize usual care

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Patient Knowledge About Risks and Benefits of Local Regional Treatment
Lasso di tempo: 5 weeks

Will be defined as the mean percentage of correct answers (range: 0-100%) from a 5-item scale previously developed and pilot tested where higher percentages indicate increased knowledge of treatment risks and benefits of local regional treatment. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous primary outcome measure patient knowledge.

5 weeks

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Patient Self-efficacy in Dealing With Breast Cancer
Lasso di tempo: 5 weeks

Will be defined as the composite score obtained from the 11-item (each rated on a 5-point Likert scale: "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree") validated scale designed to assess breast cancer patients' overall feelings of control of their cancer and worry about their cancer (range: 11 to 55); higher scores indicate increased self-efficacy. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient self-efficacy.

5 weeks
Patient Cancer Worry
Lasso di tempo: 5 weeks

Will be defined as the total score obtained from the 8-item (each rated on a 4-point Likert scale: "never" to "almost always") validated Cancer Worry Scale assessing the degree of cancer-related worry (range: 8 to 40); higher scores indicate more frequent worries about cancer. Because the interventions are fully crossed (with intervention and control patients within both intervention and control practices for every time period), the intervention effect of iCanDecide-E and the intervention effect of the clinician dashboard (CDB) will be obtained from a single linear mixed-effects model for the continuous secondary outcome measure patient cancer worry.

5 weeks

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Cattedra di studio: Sarah T. Hawley, PhD, MPH, University of Michigan School of Medicine and Public Health

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

16 febbraio 2021

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2024

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

12 luglio 2024

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

9 settembre 2020

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

9 settembre 2020

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

16 settembre 2020

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

9 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

26 ottobre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 ottobre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi