此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

生活在城市地区的儿童的阅读问题

对有阅读问题的儿童的早期干预

防止阅读障碍的第一道防线是良好的课堂阅读指导。 本研究描述了学生、教师和教学的特征如何与市中心幼儿园到 4 年级教室的学业成绩相关。

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

详细说明

最近的研究表明,通过改进课堂教学可以显着降低阅读障碍的发生率。 小学的有效阅读教学包括明确的字母顺序教学、意义阅读以及练习阅读和写作的机会。 为了更多地了解城市环境中识字技能的发展,我们对休斯顿和华盛顿特区 17 所学校的学生进行了从幼儿园到四年级的跟踪调查。学校是根据类似的人口统计数据选择的:主要是非裔美国学生 (95%)以及联邦午餐计划的高参与度(85% 至 100%)。 每所学校都提供了适合年级的阅读课程,重点是语音和拼写。 这些课程包括直接、综合、课堂和个人教学模块。

每年大约有 1400 名儿童和 114 名教师参加这项为期四年的研究。 该设计是交叉顺序的,因此一个年级的大多数教师都参与了两年。 所有参加正规教育的儿童都被纳入研究。 在标准化阅读测试中低于第 25 个百分位的儿童由退休教师单独辅导,使用课堂阅读计划中的材料。 这两个地点的教室都开设了各种阅读课程。 为了帮助教师有效地实施这些材料,采用了持续的基于研究的专业发展模式,课程顾问和教练与课堂上的教师一起工作。 研究人员在一年中使用内容的即时录音在每个教室观察了四到六次。 观察员还完成了教学能力评级。 教师完成了知识、经验、态度和教学策略的调查。 随机选择 8 到 10 名学生,在这一年中进行四次评估,以提高与识字相关的技能,并在年底进行一次评估,以评估阅读、拼写和写作方面的成就。

研究类型

介入性

注册

1400

阶段

  • 第三阶段

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

5年 至 8年 (孩子)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

纳入标准

  • 参加学校学生
  • 幼儿园到四年级

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Barbara R. Foorman、University of Texas

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

  • Foorman BR, Anthony J, Seals L, Mouzaki A. Language development and emergent literacy in preschool. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2002 Sep;9(3):173-84. doi: 10.1053/spen.2002.35497.
  • Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Boudousquie, A., Barnes, M., Schatschneider, C., & Francis, D.J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research-based, treatment-oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27-63.
  • Rayner K, Foorman BR, Perfetti CA, Pesetsky D, Seidenberg MS. How should reading be taught? Sci Am. 2002 Mar;286(3):84-91. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0302-84. No abstract available.
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
  • Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., & Schatschneider, C. (Winter, 1997). Prevention of reading failure. Insight, 22-23.
  • Foorman, B. R. (Ed.) (2003). Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulities: Bringing Science to Scale. Timonium, MD: York Press.
  • Foorman BR, Breier JI, Fletcher JM. Interventions aimed at improving reading success: an evidence-based approach. Dev Neuropsychol. 2003;24(2-3):613-39. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2003.9651913.
  • Foorman, B.R., Chen, D.T., Carlson, C., Moats, L., Francis, D.J., & Fletcher, J. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing, 16, 289-324.
  • Foorman, B.R., Fletcher, J.M., & Francis, D.J. (2004). Early reading assessment. In W.M. Evers & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Testing student learning, evaluating teaching effectiveness (pp. 81-125). Stanford, CA: The Hoover Institution.
  • Foorman, B.R., Fletcher, J.M., & Francis, D.J. (1999). Beginning reading is strategic and by design multi-level. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 5, 65-75.
  • Foorman, B.R., Fletcher, J.M., & Francis, D.J. (1998). Preventing reading failure by ensuring effective reading instruction. In S. Patton & M. Holmes (Eds.), The keys to literacy. Washington, D.C.: Council for Basic Education.
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Beeler, T., Winikates, D., & Fletcher, J.M. (1997). Early interventions for children with reading problems: Study designs and preliminary findings. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 63-71.
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Davidson, K., Harm, M., & Griffin, J. (2004). Variability in text features in six grade 1 basal reading programs. Scientific Studies in Reading, 8(2), 167-197.
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., & Schatschneider, C. (2000). Misrepresentation of research by other researchers. Educational Researcher, 29, 27-37.
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55. [Reprinted in Wray, D. (Ed.) (2004). Major Themes in Education. London, UK: Routledge.]
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Winikates, D., & Mehta, P. (1997). Early interventions for children with reading problems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 255-276. (Special issue on reading interventions)
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J, Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (1997). The case for early reading interventions. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243-264). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Foorman, B.R., & Moats, L.C. (2004). Conditions for sustaining research-based practices in early reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 25(1), 51-60.
  • Foorman, B.R., & Schatschneider, C. (2003). Measurement of teaching practices during reading/language arts instruction and its relationship to student achievement. In S. Vaughn and K.L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for observation of teaching and learning (pp. 1-30). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Foorman, B.R., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., & Moats, L.C. (2004). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Manuscript under review.
  • Foorman, B., Seals, L., Anthony, J., & Pollard-Durodola, S. (2003). Vocabulary enrichment program for third and fourth grade African American students: Description, implementation, and impact. In B.Foorman (Ed.) Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulities: Bringing Science to Scale. (pp. 419-441). Timonium, MD: York Press.
  • Foorman, B.R., & Torgesen, J.K. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 202-211.
  • Francis, D.J., Chen, D.T., Foorman, B.R., Wristers, K., Schatschcneider, C., Carlson, C., & Fletcher, J.M. (2004). Sequencing Approaches to Reading Instruction in Grades 1 and 2: An Application of Segmented Growth Models to Longitudinal Crossover Trials. Manuscript submitted.
  • Mehta, P., Foorman, B.R., Branum-Martin, L., & Taylor, W. P. (in press). Literacy as a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and implications in a longitudinal study in grades 1-4. Scientific Studies of Reading.
  • Moats, L.C., & Foorman, B.R. (2003) Measuring teachers' content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23-45.
  • Moats, L.C., & Foorman, B.R. (2004). How quality of writing instruction impacts fourth graders' writing outcomes. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Pollard-Durodola, S., Seals, L.M., & Foorman, B.R. (in press). Vocabulary enrichment project. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Rayner K, Foorman BR, Perfetti CA, Pesetsky D, Seidenberg MS. How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2001 Nov;2(2):31-74. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.00004. Epub 2001 Nov 1.
  • Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J., Francis, D., Carlson, C., & Foorman, B. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265-282.
  • Schatschneider, C., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: An application of item response theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 439-449.
  • Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., & Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A. (1999). Conceptual and methodological issues in dyslexia research: A lesson for developmental disorders (pp. 271-306). In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fletcher, J., Francis, D., Shaywitz, B., Foorman, B., & Shaywitz, S. (1998). Intelligence testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186-203.
  • Foorman, B.R. (1995). Research on The Great Debate: Code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. School Psychology Review, 24, 376-392. (Invited article for special issue on research on reading instruction.)
  • Foorman, B.R., Francis, D., Fletcher, J., & Lynn, A. (1996). Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level-match designs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 639-652.
  • Foorman, B.R., & Schatschneider, C. (1997). Beyond alphabetic reading: Comments on Torgesen's prevention and intervention studies. Journal of Academic Language Therapy, 1(1), 59-65.
  • Schatschneider C, Carlson CD, Francis DJ, Foorman BR, Fletcher JM. Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. J Learn Disabil. 2002 May-Jun;35(3):245-56. doi: 10.1177/002221940203500306.

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

1993年7月1日

研究完成

2002年6月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2003年8月1日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2003年8月1日

首次发布 (估计)

2003年8月4日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年6月3日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年6月2日

最后验证

2004年10月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

阅读指导的临床试验

3
订阅