此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Brief Informational Intervention for COVID-19 Misinformation Prophylaxis

2021年2月8日 更新者:Jon Agley、Indiana University

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has continued to affect life in the United States, the important role of non-pharmaceutical preventive behaviors (such as wearing a face mask) in reducing harm has become clear. In parallel to the pandemic, researchers have observed an "infodemic" of misinformed or inconsistent narratives about COVID-19. There is growing evidence that misinformed COVID-19 narratives are associated with a wide variety of undesirable behavior (e.g., burning down cell towers). Further, individuals' adherence to recommended COVID-19 preventive guidelines has been inconsistent, and such mandates have engendered opposition and controversy. Recent research suggests the possibility that trust in science and scientists may be an important thread to weave throughout these seemingly disparate components of the modern public health landscape. Thus, this paper describes the protocol for a randomized trial of a brief, digital intervention to increase trust in science.

The objective of this trial is to examine if exposure to a curated infographic can increase trust in science, reduce believability of misinformed narratives, and increase likelihood to engage in preventive behaviors.

研究概览

详细说明

The investigators propose a single-stage, randomized, superiority trial with 2 parallel groups allocated with a 1:1 ratio. The comparator in this study will be a control ("placebo") infographic that is completely unrelated to science (e.g., about cats), but that is developed using the same communication and graphical style.

Subjects will be recruited using the Prolific data collection platform, which is one of two primary online crowdsourced research platforms (the other is Amazon's Mechanical Turk, or mTurk).

To be included, participants must be identified by Prolific as part of a nationally-representative sample. Participants will also be required to be age 18 or older, and to reside in the United States. Individuals who decline to digitally sign the informed consent document will be excluded and replaced. Per recent best practice recommendations for crowdsourced digital research, attention checks and screens for "bots" and international users with virtual private networks to mimic US IP addresses will be embedded within the instruments, and failure of more than one attention check, or any bot/location check will result in subject exclusion and replacement. Replacements will be drawn in such a way as to preserve the representativeness of the sample.

Missing data will be addressed using either full information maximum likelihood or Markov Chain Monte Carlo multiple imputation strategies. When there is a violation of missing at random (which is unlikely) in preliminary analyses, the investigators will incorporate strategies representing the missingness. The researchers will further explore data quality in terms of outliers, measurement error, non-normality, and variance heterogeneity. Robust methods of analysis (e.g., Huber-White robust standard errors) will be used, as appropriate. For all multi-item measures, reliability will be evaluated prior to computation of the variable.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

1017

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Indiana
      • Bloomington、Indiana、美国、47404
        • Digital Intervention (Prolific Study Panel)

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be included, participants must be identified by Prolific as part of a nationally-representative sample. Participants will also be required to be age 18 or older, and to reside in the United States.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who decline to digitally sign the informed consent document will be excluded and replaced. Per recent best practice recommendations for crowdsourced digital research, attention checks and screens for "bots" and international users with virtual private networks to mimic US internet protocol addresses will be embedded within the instruments, and failure of more than one attention check, or any bot/location check will result in subject exclusion and replacement.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Brief Intervention arm
The primary intervention in this study will be an infographic that is designed to build trust in the scientific process (as described in the Intervention section). This arm will introduce the intervention and then instruct the participant to review it carefully (including a mandated pause on the infographic screen) before continuing to the remaining data collection.
The primary intervention in this study will be an infographic that is designed to build trust in the scientific process. Infographics are preferable to narratives or text because they center visuals as part of the storytelling process and facilitate cognitive information processing, knowledge absorption, and enhanced persuasion. The study's infographic design will follow best practices in health communication. The message will be simple and jargon free. Visuals will include individuals (scientists), charts, text, and numbers. Attention will be paid to images, color, frames, representation, and composition (e.g., how the elements in the infographic are organized to show their relationship to each other).
安慰剂比较:Placebo Control arm
The comparator in this study will be a control ("placebo") infographic that is completely unrelated to science (As described in the Placebo Control section). This arm will introduce the control infographic and then instruct the participant to review it carefully (including a mandated pause on the infographic screen) before continuing to the remaining data collection.
The comparator in this study will be a control ("placebo") infographic that is completely unrelated to science (e.g., about cats), but that is developed using the same communication and graphical style.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in trust in science
大体时间:Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention
21-item scale developed by Nadelson et al [1] called the Trust in Science Inventory. It is scored from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates low trust and 5 indicates high trust.
Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention
Believability profiles
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Will be computed using latent profile analysis of believability measures. These measures were developed and first used in our recent study of COVID-19 narratives [2]. Response options for these measures used well-established semantic differential responses for believability of different statements (e.g., as in Herzberg et al.) [3] ranging from [1: Extremely unbelievable] to [7: Extremely believable]. Exact measures used to generate profiles for this study will be available in the published protocol paper (to be submitted).
Immediately post-intervention
Preventive behavioral intentions
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
A series of six questions based on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommended COVID-19 preventive behaviors. [4] Questions will be written according to Azjen's guide to intention questionnaires [5].
Immediately post-intervention

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Political orientation (covariate 1)
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Scale variable (0: Conservative to 10: Liberal) as in our prior work [2, 6]
Immediately post-intervention
Religious commitment (covariate 2)
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Scale variable (0: Low commitment to 10: High commitment) as in our prior work [2, 6]
Immediately post-intervention
Sociodemographics (covariates 3 through 6)
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Race/ethnicity, gender, age, and education level using standardized questions
Immediately post-intervention
COVID-19 diagnosis (covariates 7 and 8)
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Two self report questions. The first asks whether the respondent has been diagnosed with COVID-19, and the second asks more broadly whether the respondent believes they have had COVID-19. Question wording will be per Bruine de Bruin (2020) [7].
Immediately post-intervention
Perceived severity of COVID-19 (covariate 9)
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Based on the Health Belief Model as used in Yıldırıma & Gülerc [8].
Immediately post-intervention
Self-efficacy to act regarding COVID-19
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Based on the Health Belief Model as used in Yıldırıma & Gülerc [8].
Immediately post-intervention
Normative beliefs about friends' and family's COVID-19 behaviors
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention
Single item from Chambon et al [9].
Immediately post-intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2020年1月14日

初级完成 (实际的)

2021年1月14日

研究完成 (实际的)

2021年1月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2020年9月16日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2020年9月17日

首次发布 (实际的)

2020年9月21日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2021年2月9日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2021年2月8日

最后验证

2021年2月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

Fully de-identified data (full dataset) will be made available along with the publication of the primary results paper from this study.

IPD 共享时间框架

Fully de-identified data will be made available along with the publication of the primary results paper from this study.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液
  • 国际碳纤维联合会
  • 分析代码

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

COVID19 Behavioral Prophylaxis的临床试验

Brief informational infographic的临床试验

3
订阅