此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

StriveWeekly Trial Post-pandemic

2022年8月11日 更新者:Leslie Rith-Najarian、Harvard University

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of StriveWeekly for Anxiety and Depression Prevention for College Students During COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)

With the COVID-19 pandemic completely altering the landscape of higher education, students have been experiencing more stress than ever. With Harvard University's plan for students to return to campus for the 2021-2022 academic year, offering an online mental health program such as StriveWeekly could provide students with stress management support as they transition back after 1.5 years of remote learning. This study will use a randomized controlled trial design to test the effectiveness of a waitlist versus StriveWeekly. This study will allow us to test if a program that has previously demonstrated effectiveness with university students in reducing anxiety and depression symptoms will still be effective after the unprecedented amount of stressors during a global pandemic.

Primary aim: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of StriveWeekly in preventing or reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression. The use of a waitlist condition will allow us to experimentally assess if the online intervention is responsible for decreasing / preventing worsened anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms over time. Given the previously established effectiveness of StriveWeekly as an indicated prevention program, we expect students in the intervention condition to experience significantly better symptoms compared to the waitlist from baseline to posttest. Alternatively, if the transition back from remote learning and/or the broad pandemic context interferes with the acceptability or effectiveness of StriveWeekly, then we might expect to see little to no significant differences between the online intervention condition and waitlist condition from baseline to posttest.

Secondary aims include: (a) testing moderators of intervention effectiveness and (b) evaluating the intervention in terms of acceptability (e.g., feedback on program name; demographically representativeness of student user sample; satisfactory adherence and satisfaction rates). Exploratory moderation analyses across groups will help determine whether or not the intervention condition produces unique or additive effects for students with certain characteristics over and above changes demonstrated by similar students in the waitlist condition. Acceptability analyses will allow for more nuanced evaluation of StriveWeekly's effectiveness as a program, beyond its ability to facilitate symptom reduction.

研究概览

详细说明

Recruitment. Recruitment materials will be distributed via a mass email to all enrolled students, announcements over house emails lists (e.g., academic departments), and social media announcements.

Pre-trial needs assessment and pilot. Prior to the full RCT, we will conduct a campus-wide needs assessment survey to gather information about student needs and preferences related to mental health programming. Student responses will inform the specifics of StriveWeekly implementation during the academic year (e.g., preferred timing of programming, appropriateness of content across a diverse student population). After the needs assessment, we will invite a small group of students to participate in a small pilot of the revised StriveWeekly platform. Students who participate in the pilot will be invited to provide their program feedback via online surveys. Students who participate in the pilot data collection will still be eligible for the full RCT study, but may be excluded from the final data analysis sample.

Pragmatic trial design. For a trial design using self-guided online intervention, it is important that the design mimics intended intervention use (Fleming et al., 2018). As examples, overly stringent inclusion criteria limit generalizability, or face-to-face assessments may provide added benefit beyond the intervention itself (Fleming et al., 2018). Therefore, as much as possible our methods simulate how a real-world campus might offer online services as usual. First, we are employing cluster randomization, for reasons elaborated below. Second, participants in either condition will be allowed to access other on- or off-campus mental health services and resources; in our statistical analyses we will control for service use rather than excluding such students. Third, all data collection and participant communications will be electronic rather than in-person to: (a) include all students remote or on-campus, (b) avoid unintentionally bolstering motivation (e.g., inducing social desirability to please researchers), and (c) avoid adding barriers (e.g., time demands, concerns about privacy). Finally, survey compensation amount will be modest enough to increase participant response rates without artificially inflating adherence rates or self-reported improvement due to financial incentive.

Random assignment. Cluster randomization will be used to assign students according to their residential affiliation to the immediate intervention condition or the waitlist condition (i.e., delayed access). Although cluster randomization can introduce statistical confounds for analyzing intervention outcomes at the individual participant level, they can be preferred: (a) to avoid intervention "contamination" effects (e.g., if participants in both conditions can regularly interact and thus might exchange health-related knowledge), and (b) if it allows the intervention to be delivered as it would be in real practice (Cook, Delong, Murray, Vollmer, & Heagerty, 2016). Moreover, the benefits of cluster randomization by residential house/dorm affiliation for this trial are crucial for the social aspects of the StriveWeekly program. For example, students will know who else is concurrently participating in the program (e.g., any of their friends in X, Y, Z house), allowing for peer-to-peer engagement. Also, this will allow for easier coordination of any optional complementary programming by residential staff at each house/dorm. A randomizer was already used to assign half the freshmen and upperclassman residential buildings to each condition.

Data collection. Prior to beginning any research procedures, students will provide their informed consent online via Qualtrics. Participants will be required to login to Qualtrics via HarvardKey Shibboleth, which will be configured to only allow currently active Harvard accounts. Once consent has been obtained for an individual student, they will be directed to an online survey for the study baseline assessment. The baseline survey will be open for two weeks. Students assigned to the intervention group will receive an access code in the email, allowing them to access the online platform and set-up their account. The intervention group will then be active for seven weeks, after which the posttest survey will open to the intervention group and waitlist group for one-two weeks. Thereafter, students who were assigned to the waitlist group will gain access to the online intervention for seven weeks. After this delayed access group completes the intervention, there will be a follow-up survey for all participants from both conditions. See timeline table below.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

538

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge、Massachusetts、美国、02138
        • Harvard University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

16年 及以上 (孩子、成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • enrolled as a student at Harvard College (academic year 2021-2022)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • invalid data reporting (e.g., straight-lined responses to surveys)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Immediate Intervention Condition
Participants in this condition will receive 7-8 weeks of online intervention modules. Specific modules will be selected based on a campus-wide needs assessment conducted in May 2021.
The intervention (app.striveweekly.com) delivers content via independent modules. Principles covered in content modules: Psychoeducation; Self-monitoring; Values-based goal-setting; Behavioral activation; Cognitive restructuring; Sleep hygiene; Time management; Interpersonal avoidance exposures; Physical exercise; Mindfulness; Relaxation strategies; Maintenance planning. Modules get released week-by-week, and participants are self-guided through content. To facilitate skills practice, every module is accompanied by: a weekly intro email and reminder emails; an "extras" section for tips/suggestions; and a weekly prize drawing. The "Dashboard" section of the intervention displays user progress, including self-rating graphs and a history log of skills practice. The "Campus" section of this dashboard provided: campus-specific announcements; referrals to relevant campus wellness resources; and an anonymous livestream of all campus users' activity.
无干预:Waitlist Condition
Participants in this condition will wait to receive StriveWeekly until after the Immediate Intervention condition is complete and participants from both conditions have completed the posttest survey.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21)
大体时间:Baseline to Posttest (~8 weeks)
Change in self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress (completed via online surveys). Items are rated on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. Subscale total scores range from 0-21, and DASS-21 total scores range from 0-63.
Baseline to Posttest (~8 weeks)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Perceived Stress Scale
大体时间:Baseline to Posttest (~8 weeks)
10-item self-report about subjective experiences of stress (completed via online surveys). Items are rated on a scale of 0-4 (four items are reverse scored), with higher scores indicating worse stress. Total scores range from 0-40.
Baseline to Posttest (~8 weeks)
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales
大体时间:Baseline to Posttest (~8 weeks)
A standardized 7-item scale designed to measure mental wellbeing in the general population (i.e., not necessarily clinical) and evaluate change in response to programs that aim to improve mental wellbeing. Completed via online surveys. Items are rated on a 5-point likert scale, with higher scores indicating a positive mental wellbeing and functioning. Total scores range from 7-35.
Baseline to Posttest (~8 weeks)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 学习椅:Katie McLaughlin, PhD、Harvard University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2021年5月19日

初级完成 (实际的)

2022年4月18日

研究完成 (实际的)

2022年6月10日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2021年6月9日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2021年6月9日

首次发布 (实际的)

2021年6月16日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2022年8月15日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2022年8月11日

最后验证

2022年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • IRB20-1337

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅