The Effects of Kinesio Tape® on Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition and Rate of Torque Development

February 20, 2024 updated by: Marc Norcross, Oregon State University
This study evaluates whether the use of Kinesio Tape® in combination with a standard exercise program improves muscle function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Twenty participants will receive Kinesio Tape® and perform an ankle exercise program, while twenty will perform the ankle exercise program without Kinesio Tape®.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Decreased ability to voluntarily activate the entire motoneuron (MN) pool following joint injury is known as arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI), which is commonly quantified by measuring central activation ratio (CAR). AMI is not only observed immediately after joint injury, but has been shown to persist during and after rehabilitation. It is proposed that AMI, by negatively impacting neuromuscular factors such as muscle strength, muscle activation, and rate of torque development (RTD), contributes to a prolonged rehabilitation process and higher risk of re-injury. Unfortunately, AMI cannot be reduced by traditional rehabilitation interventions such as strength training alone. Therefore, it is necessary to identify an intervention that can effectively decrease AMI in order to facilitate improvements in muscle function in individuals with AMI.

Kinesio Tape® is commonly used to facilitate muscle contraction in athletic populations. This elastic therapeutic tape is popular in the athletic setting because it can be applied and used continually during exercise and activities of daily living for up to 2-3 days without restricting movement. It has been suggested that Kinesio Tape® facilitates muscle contraction by inducing increased sensory input via skin stimulation. The tape activates cutaneous mechanoreceptors with the greater afferent feedback thought to improve the efferent output from the central nervous system to the target muscles. While this technique is widely used in the clinical setting to improve muscle function, the facilitative effect of Kinesio Tape® has not been demonstrated- perhaps due to three key limitations of previous investigations. First, previous studies have predominantly recruited healthy participants without muscle function deficits. Therefore, there could have been a ceiling effect whereby there was no observable effect of Kinesio Tape® due to a lack of muscle dysfunction in these healthy individuals. Second, most investigators have generally taken outcome measurements immediately before Kinesio Tape® application and less than 24 hours later. This is much shorter than the 2-3 days that Kinesio Tape® is used clinically and may not be long enough to induce an observable, facilitative effect. Finally, the protocols utilized in previous investigations also failed to mimic clinical practice by not combining Kinesio Tape® application with a therapeutic exercise protocol targeting the inhibited muscle.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of prolonged application (> 48hours) of Kinesio Tape® incorporated with a therapeutic exercise protocol on AMI and muscle function. To do so, we will use the peroneus longus muscle in individuals with functional ankle instability (FAI) as a model, given that AMI has been shown to exist in this muscle in individuals with FAI.

The following specific aims will be tested:

Aim#1. To investigate the effect of prolonged application (> 48hours) of Kinesio Tape® incorporated with a therapeutic exercise protocol on AMI of the peroneus longus in individuals with FAI.

Aim#2. To investigate the effect of prolonged application(> 48hours) of Kinesio Tape® incorporated with a therapeutic exercise protocol on peroneus longus muscle function in individuals with FAI.

Our central hypothesis is that prolonged application of Kinesio Tape® in combination with therapeutic exercise will diminish AMI and improve muscle function of the inhibited peroneus longus muscle.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Corvallis, Oregon, United States, 97331
        • Oregon State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A history of at least one significant ankle sprain on the involved (injured) limb i. The initial sprain must have occurred at least 12 months prior to the study enrollment ii. Was associated with inflammatory symptoms (pain, swelling, etc.) iii. Created at least one interrupted day of desired physical activity.
  2. The most recent injury on the involved (injured) ankle must have occurred more than 3 months prior to the study enrollment.
  3. A history of the involved (injured) ankle joint 'giving way', and/or recurrent sprain and/or 'feelings of instability' on the involved (injured) limb Participants should report at least 2 episodes of 'giving way' in the 6 months prior to the study enrolment.
  4. Be 18-35 years of age
  5. Have not had a past allergic reaction to Kinesio Tape®

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a history of previous surgeries to the musculoskeletal structures (i.e., bones, joint structures, nerves, etc.) in either lower extremity.
  2. Have a history of a fracture in either lower extremity requiring realignment.
  3. Had acute injury to the musculoskeletal structures of other joints of either lower extremity in the previous 3 months which impacted joint integrity and function (i.e., sprains, fractures, etc.) and resulted in at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity.
  4. Are not able to be matched according to our group allocation procedure
  5. Have had a past allergic reaction to Kinesio Tape®
  6. Currently display symptoms of an acute sprain including swelling, heat, redness, pain, discoloration, and/or loss of range of motion or function
  7. Any diagnosed vestibular disorder, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorder, Ehlers-Danlos, or other hereditary nerve, balance or connective tissue disorder
  8. Report a possibility that they may be pregnant as hormonal changes may affect ligamentous laxity
  9. Have suffered more than one ankle sprain on the uninvolved limb
  10. Have had an ankle sprain on the uninvolved limb within the past 12 months
  11. Have episodes of giving way of the ankle on the uninvolved limb besides the single time when they may have sprained this ankle.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Kinesio Tape
Kinesiotaping of the peroneus longus according to the guidelines provided by the Kinesio Taping Association (Kase, K. 2016) followed by standardized set of therapeutic exercises that are commonly implemented in ankle rehabilitation programs.
The application of Kinesio Tape® (kinesiotaping) according to the guidelines provided by the Kinesio Taping Association (Kase, K. 2016). A 5 cm width strip of Kinesio Tape® (Kinesio TEX Products, NKT-050, Japan) will be applied from origin (the head of the fibula) to insertion (the medial cuneiform and first metatarsal) of the peroneus longus in a longitudinal direction. The proximal anchors will be applied without tension, and the Kinesio Tape® placed on approximately 50% stretch before being applied over the peroneus longus and the distal anchor point.
Other Names:
  • Kinesio Tape®
No Intervention: Control
Baseline measures followed by standardized set of therapeutic exercises that are commonly implemented in ankle rehabilitation programs, but no use of kinesiotape.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Central Activation Ratio
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 2 days post-intervention
Ratio between maximal voluntary evertor torque and torque produced following the application of an exogenous electrical stimulus
Change between baseline and 2 days post-intervention
Change in Rate of Torque Development
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 2 days post-intervention
Measure of explosive strength determined by placing a line of best fit to a recorded torque-time curve from onset to 100ms after onset
Change between baseline and 2 days post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 2 days post-intervention
Measure of maximal voluntary isometric torque that participant can produce
Change between baseline and 2 days post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc F Norcross, PhD, Oregon State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 7967 (CTEP)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neural Inhibition

Clinical Trials on Kinesiotaping

3
Subscribe