EZ Blocker Versus Left Sided Double-lumen Tube

April 29, 2011 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Endobronchial EZ Blocker Compared to Left Sided Double-lumen Tube for One-lung Ventilation

Lung isolation is used to achieve one lung ventilation to facilitate thoracic surgery. Two methods are commonly used, a double lumen tube (DLT) or a bronchial blocker introduced through a single lumen tube. However, both techniques have advantages and disadvantages. Briefly, the DLT can be positioned faster and remains firmly in place, but is sometimes difficult or even impossible to introduce. The DLT is larger than a conventional single lumen tube and the incidence of postoperative hoarseness and airway injuries is higher. Compared to the DLT, bronchial blocking devices are more difficult to position and need more frequent intraoperative repositioning. These disadvantages of the existing devices for lung isolation prompted further development of the bronchial blocker concept. The design of a new Y shaped bronchial blocker, the EZ- Blocker® (AnaesthetIQ BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) (EZB), combines the advantages of both lung isolation techniques. The aim of the study is to compare in a randomised, prospective way the ease of placement, the incidence of malpositioning and the quality of lung deflation of a left DLT and a EZB. Secondly, the incidence and severity of damage to laryngeal, tracheal and bronchial structures caused by the use of the DLT or the EZB is a target of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500HB
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status 1-3 patients
  • Patients scheduled for surgery requiring a left sided DLT for single lung ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications are lesions along the path of the left sided double lumen tube or the EZB
  • Tracheal or mainstem bronchial stenosis
  • Distorted carinal anatomy,
  • Anticipated difficult intubation (Mallampatti score ≥ 3)
  • History or presence of tracheostoma
  • Patients who require absolute lung separation
  • Patients who require sleeve resection of mainstem bronchus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Left double lumen tube
Traditionally, single lung ventilation is obtained with a double lumen tube (DLT). In our institution a polyvinyl DLT (Broncho-cath, Mallinckrodt,) without carinal hook, is used. This type of tube exists of a tube with two lumen with two distal cuffs. One lumen (called the bronchial lumen) extends some distance further, has a slight curvature and has a small blue cuff. The other lumen (called the tracheal lumen) has a larger cuff. A DLT tube exists in four sizes and one can choose in a left or a right configuration. Almost always, we use a left sided DLT. A DLT has a much larger diameter than a standard single lumen endotracheal tube
Device: Placement of double lumen tube for one-lung ventilation
The gold standard for lung isolation is the use of a double lumen tube (DLT). A DLT is a bifurcated tube with a bronchial and a tracheal lumen.
Other Names:
  • Broncho-cath (Mallinckrodt)
Active Comparator: EZ-blocker
The EZ-blocker (EZB) is a semi-rigid catheter but it has two distal extensions, both with an inflatable cuff and a central lumen. It is intended for use in combination with a standard single lumen tube. After the EZB is advanced trough the distal end of the single lumen tube, both extensions spread out and find their way in the left and right main stem bronchi. The place where the two extensions are attached to the shaft now rests on the carina. Fiber optic bronchoscopy should be used for proper positioning. After placement of the EZB, one of the cuffs can be inflated to obtain lung separation under direct visual inspection with fiber optic bronchoscopy.
Device: Placement of EZ- Blocker for one-lung ventilation
Bronchial blockers are balloon-tipped semi-rigid catheters. Different types are available. They are not easy to put in position and frequently dislocates during repositioning of the patient or during surgical manipulation. To solve these problems, a novel type of bronchus blocker, i.e. the EZ- Blocker® is developed. The EZB is also a semi-rigid catheter but it has two distal extensions, both with an inflatable cuff and a central lumen. These improvements owe to the fact that the blocker anchors itself on the carina with the two extensions.
Other Names:
  • EZ-blocker (AnaesthetIQ BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the incidence of malposition of a left sided DLT or the EZB
Time Frame: there are four time points (after insertion of the device, after inflation of cuff or balloon, after repositioning patient, during surgery) were malposition are considered. Total time spend is 3 hours on the day of the operation
there are four time points (after insertion of the device, after inflation of cuff or balloon, after repositioning patient, during surgery) were malposition are considered. Total time spend is 3 hours on the day of the operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
description of damage to laryngeal, tracheal and bronchial structures
Time Frame: videobronchoscopy before and after intervention. Time frame 5 min for each video and additional 5 min for assessment afterwards on the day of the operation
videobronchoscopy before and after intervention. Time frame 5 min for each video and additional 5 min for assessment afterwards on the day of the operation
the ease of insertion
Time Frame: the ease of insertion of the devices is qualitative variable: 1= excellent, 2= good, 3=average, 4=poor. Time frame is 5 min on the day of the operation.
the ease of insertion of the devices is qualitative variable: 1= excellent, 2= good, 3=average, 4=poor. Time frame is 5 min on the day of the operation.
the incidence of postoperative complains of sore throat and hoarseness
Time Frame: questionnaire (2 questions, time frame is 1 min) after surgery and one day after surgery
questionnaire (2 questions, time frame is 1 min) after surgery and one day after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Radboud University Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jo Mourisse, Dr., Department of anesthesiology, pain and palliative medicine of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medial Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 2, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 29, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NL30799,091,09

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings