Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on BIS-guided Propofol Requirements During General Anesthesia

June 3, 2011 updated by: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Estimation of the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on BIS-guided Propofol Requirements During General Anesthesia

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the interaction of lidocaine infusion initiated and maintained during surgery, on propofol requirements during general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Use of intravenous lidocaine as a coadjuvant agent during general anesthesia has increased. Lidocaine infusion during and after abdominal surgery decreases postoperative pain and reduces ileus duration, reducing patient´s hospital stay and opioid consumption. Intravenous lidocaine´s effect on other intravenous anesthetics is unclear, and there are no present studies evaluating its interaction on hypnotic anesthetic requirements when using a BIS (Bispectral Index) monitor to maintain an adequate depth of anesthesia. We therefore decided to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the interaction of systemic lidocaine infusion, initiated and maintained during surgery, on propofol requirements and anesthetic depth as measured by BIS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Chile
    • RM
      • Santiago, RM, Chile, 8330024
        • Hospital Clínico Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-II patients,
  • Between 20 and 65 years of age
  • Programed for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Eligible for total intravenous anesthesia with propofol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness to participate in the study
  • Adverse reactions to the drugs used in the study
  • Use of medications that interfere in local anesthetic metabolism
  • History of liver disease, kidney failure, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia or hypophosphatemia
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse
  • Chronic use of benzodiazepines

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Intravenous lidocaine infusion
Intravenous lidocaine infusion during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol administered by target controlled infusion
Drug: Intravenous lidocaine infusion
Once the dose of propofol required for general anesthesia is stabilized for 5 minutes with BIS values between 40 and 50, lidocaine 1% infusion is begun in a bolus of 1.5mg/kg for 5 minutes and then infused at 2 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery (last skin suture is made).
Drug: Propofol 1% (intravenous infusion)
Propofol is administered according to a widely-accepted pharmacokinetic model, initially dosed to a target controlled infusion (TCI) of 4.5 micrograms/ml, and titrated by step increases of 0.5 every minute until loss of conscience is obtained and BIS values are less than 50. During the maintenance phase of anesthesia propofol TCI is actively titrated to maintain BIS values between 40 and 50. If BIS is out of this range for more than 10 seconds, propofol is adjusted in 0.5 ug/mc to maintain BIS values in the predetermined limits.
Procedure: Placement of arterial line
An arterial line was placed in the anesthetised patient´s right arm by the investigator and arterial samples were obtained every 10 minutes since initiation of the study infusion to determine plasmatic lidocaine and propofol levels (if the infusion was saline the samples were not analyzed). The arterial line was removed before the end of surgery.
Placebo Comparator: Intravenous 0.9% saline infusion
Intravenous 0.9% saline infusion during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol administered by target controlled infusion
Drug: Propofol 1% (intravenous infusion)
Propofol is administered according to a widely-accepted pharmacokinetic model, initially dosed to a target controlled infusion (TCI) of 4.5 micrograms/ml, and titrated by step increases of 0.5 every minute until loss of conscience is obtained and BIS values are less than 50. During the maintenance phase of anesthesia propofol TCI is actively titrated to maintain BIS values between 40 and 50. If BIS is out of this range for more than 10 seconds, propofol is adjusted in 0.5 ug/mc to maintain BIS values in the predetermined limits.
Procedure: Placement of arterial line
An arterial line was placed in the anesthetised patient´s right arm by the investigator and arterial samples were obtained every 10 minutes since initiation of the study infusion to determine plasmatic lidocaine and propofol levels (if the infusion was saline the samples were not analyzed). The arterial line was removed before the end of surgery.
Other: Placebo (0.9% saline infusion)
Once the dose of propofol required for general anesthesia is stabilized for 5 minutes with BIS values between 40 and 50, 0.9% saline infusion is begun in a bolus of 1.5mg/kg for 5 minutes and then infused at 2 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery (last skin suture is made).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total propofol requirements during bispectral index guided general anesthesia
Time Frame: DAY 1.
During and after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients' anesthetic depth will be monitored during the intra-operative period using a BIS monitor. Patients' follow up considers the immediate post-operative period at the recovery room (PACU), and it will continue until patients' discharge from the hospital (average 3 days postoperatively).
DAY 1.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on waking time after general anesthesia
Time Frame: DAY 1.
Immediately after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, during PACU stay. Patients' follow up considers the immediate post-operative period at the recovery room (PACU), and it will continue until patients' discharge from the hospital (average 3 days postoperatively).
DAY 1.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Fernando R Altermatt, MD, Departamento de Anestesiología, Hospital Clínico Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 6, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LPBIS-UC-2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings