The Effect of Natalizumab (Tysabri) on Sexual Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis (Tysex)

February 14, 2017 updated by: University of South Florida
The purpose of this study is to determine if sexual dysfunction symptoms and quality of life measures in patients with Multiple Sclerosis may be improved in patients that are prescribed Tysabri.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients will be naive to Tysabri at the baseline for this study then their sexual dysfunction, fatigue, and quality of life measures will be measured using scaled questionnaires.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • University of South Florida, Frank and Carol Morsani Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must give written informed consent and provide all authorizations required by local law(ex. Protected Health Information, PHI)
  2. Minimum baseline score of 15 for the primary sexual dysfunction subscale of the MSISQ-19 (questions 12,16,17,18,19)
  3. Men and Women between 18 and 60 years of age
  4. Must have EDSS less than or equal to 5.5 at baseline
  5. Must be able to walk at least 100m without assistive devices
  6. Must have a documented diagnosis of a relapsing remitting form of MS as defined by the revised McDonald Committee criteria (Polman et al.,2005)
  7. Must have a recent MRI (within 1 year from baseline)
  8. Must satisfy the locally approved therapeutic indications for TYSABRI
  9. Must be stable in disability for at least 30 days prior to enrollment to the study
  10. Must be Natalizumab naïve
  11. Must be stable in symptomatic management of the disease, for at least 30 days prior to enrollment in the study
  12. Must be on a stable regimen of all symptomatic medications for Multiple Sclerosis especially those that could interfere with sexual function (specifically anti-cholinergics, anti-hypertensives, etc.) for at least 30 days prior to the enrollment.
  13. Must be considered by the Investigator to be free of signs and symptoms suggestive of PML based on medical history, physical examination, or laboratory testing.
  14. Must be willing to discontinue and remain free from concomitant immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (including IFN and GA) while being treated with Natalizumab during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Must give written informed consent and provide all authorizations required by local law(ex. Protected Health Information, PHI)
  2. Minimum baseline score of 15 for the primary sexual dysfunction subscale of the MSISQ-19 (questions 12,16,17,18,19)
  3. Men and Women between 18 and 60 years of age
  4. Must have EDSS less than or equal to 5.5 at baseline
  5. Must be able to walk at least 100m without assistive devices
  6. Must have a documented diagnosis of a relapsing remitting form of MS as defined by the revised McDonald Committee criteria (Polman et al.,2005)
  7. Must have a recent MRI (within 1 year from baseline)
  8. Must satisfy the locally approved therapeutic indications for TYSABRI
  9. Must be stable in disability for at least 30 days prior to enrollment to the study
  10. Must be Natalizumab naïve
  11. Must be stable in symptomatic management of the disease, for at least 30 days prior to enrollment in the study
  12. Must be on a stable regimen of all symptomatic medications for Multiple Sclerosis especially those that could interfere with sexual function (specifically anti-cholinergics, anti-hypertensives, etc.) for at least 30 days prior to the enrollment.
  13. Must be considered by the Investigator to be free of signs and symptoms suggestive of PML based on medical history, physical examination, or laboratory testing.
  14. Must be willing to discontinue and remain free from concomitant immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (including IFN and GA) while being treated with Natalizumab during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexual Dysfunction (as Measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire (MSISQ-19) )
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in level of dysfunction demonstrated by the comparison and analysis of Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire (MSISQ-19) responses at end of study to baseline. Minimum score of 19 to maximum score of 95, the higher score indicates a greater level of sexual dysfunction. Primary subscale (min 5 to max 25), Secondary subscale (min 9 to max 45), tertiary subscale (min 5 to max 25), subscale scores are summed for overall total score.
Baseline, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexual Function (as Measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL-54))
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in composite score in the sexual function subscale of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL-54) over 6 months of Natalizumab treatment. Minimum score of 0 and max score of 100. A higher score indicates a more positive outcome (less sexual dysfunction).
Baseline, 6 months
Health Related Quality of Life (as Measured by the Functional Assessment of MS (FAMS))
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in score on the Functional Assessment of MS (FAMS) questionnaire.The FAMS consists of 44 scored items in six quality-of-life domains: Mobility (seven items), Symptoms (seven items), Emotional well being (seven items), General contentment (seven items), Thinking/fatigue (nine items), and Family/social well being (seven items). Minimum score of 0 to max score of 176. A higher scores indicates positive (better) functional health related quality.
Baseline, 6 months
Quality of Life (as Measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL-54))
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in score on the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL-54) from end of study compared to baseline. The MSQOL-54 is a 54-item quality of life questionnaire that has general, as well as, MS specific questions covered in 6 sub-categories (mobility, symptoms, emotional well-being, general contentment, thinking and fatigue, family/social well-being). Minimum score of 0 to maximum score of 100. Overall quality of life is calculated by averaging question 53 and 54. The sub-scales( mental and physical health) are on a weighted scale. Sets of questions are totaled and divided by the number of questions in each section then that section total is multiplied by a weighted value. Then all weighted values are summed for all relevant question sections for that subscale to compute a composite score for both mental health and physical health. A higher score, indicates a higher perceived quality of life for the patient. A lower scorer indicates poorer quality of life impacted by MS.
Baseline, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of South Florida

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tuan Vu, MD, University of South Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • US-TYS-10-10057

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings