Multiple Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety of Multiple Doses of Denosumab 120 mg in Adults With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and CKD on Dialysis

January 22, 2016 updated by: Amgen

An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety of Multiple Doses of Denosumab 120 mg Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and CKD on Dialysis

The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of clinically significant hypocalcemia following multiple 120 mg subcutaneous doses of denosumab in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and CKD on dialysis

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Tempe, Arizona, United States, 85284
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80230
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33028
        • Research Site
    • Idaho
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48236
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78215
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects at least 18 years old with severe CKD (defined as creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min at both screening assessments) and CKD requiring hemodialysis
  • Additional inclusion criteria apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have calcium, phosphate, and magnesium levels appropriate for their condition and must not have other uncontrolled co-morbidities.
  • Additional exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Denosumab
Participants received two 120 mg doses of denosumab administered subcutaneously on Day 1 and Day 29.
Drug: Denosumab
Adminstered by subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • AMG 162
  • XGEVA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Hypocalcemia
Time Frame: 113 days
Clinically significant hypocalcemia is defined as albumin-adjusted calcium < 7.0 mg/dL or symptomatic hypocalcemia. Symptomatic hypocalcemiais is defined as both a clinical adverse event of hypocalcemia and a concomitant symptom of hypocalcemia (e.g., hypoesthesia, paresthesia, muscle cramps, seizure, prolonged QT interval) that occurred along with the hypocalcemia event or decreased serum calcium levels.
113 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Determined by CTCAE v.4.0 Criteria
Time Frame: 113 days
The severity of hypocalcemia (a low concentration of calcium, corrected for albumin, in the blood) was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v.4.0 criteria: Grade 1: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < lower limit of normal (LLN; 9.2 mg/dL) to 8.0 mg/dL; Grade 2: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < 8.0 to 7.0 mg/dL; Grade 3: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < 7.0 to 6.0 mg/dL; Grade 4: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < 6.0 mg/dL.
113 days
Number of Participants With Hypophosphatemia Determined by CTCAE v.4.0 Criteria
Time Frame: 113 days
The severity of hypophosphatemia (a low concentration of phosphates in the blood) was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v.4.0 criteria: Grade 1: < LLN (3 mg/dL) - 2.5 mg/dL; Grade 2: < 2.5 - 2.0 mg/dL; Grade 3: < 2.0 - 1.0 mg/dL; Grade 4: < 1.0 mg/dL.
113 days
Number of Participants With Hypomagnesemia Determined by CTCAE v.4.0 Criteria
Time Frame: 113 days
The severity of hypomagnesemia (a low concentration of magnesium in the blood) was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v.4.0 criteria: Grade 1: < LLN (1.5 mg/dL) - 1.2 mg/dL; Grade 2: < 1.2 - 0.9 mg/dL; Grade 3: < 0.9 - 0.7 mg/dL; Grade 4: < 0.7 mg/dL.
113 days
Percent Change From Baseline in Albumin-adjusted Serum Calcium Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Magnesium Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 113 days
The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. The investigator assessed whether AEs were possibly related to study drug by answering the question: "Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the investigational product?" Abnormal laboratory findings without clinical significance (based on the investigator's judgment) were not recorded as AEs, however, laboratory value changes that required treatment or adjustment in current therapy were considered AEs. A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal, • life-threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death), • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, • congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or • other medically important serious event.
113 days
Maximum Observed Serum Denosumab Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 20 ng/mL.
Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Time to Maximum Observed Serum Denosumab Concentration (Tmax)
Time Frame: Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 20 ng/mL.
Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 4 Weeks (AUC0-4wks) After Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1, 8, 15, and 29 (predose)
Estimated using the linear trapezoidal method.
Days 1, 8, 15, and 29 (predose)
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Weeks (AUC0-12wks) After Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29 (predose), 36, 43, 57, 71, and 85
Estimated using the linear trapezoidal method.
Days 29 (predose), 36, 43, 57, 71, and 85
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum C-Telopeptide Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Baseline and Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-denosumab Antibodies
Time Frame: From Day 1 (predose) to Day 113
From Day 1 (predose) to Day 113

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 22, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20101361

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings