Schizophrenia, Related Troubles and Glutathione: Clinical Trial. Effects of Oral Administration of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) on the Brain Glutathione Level and on the Symptoms of Schizophrenia

January 17, 2012 updated by: Dresse Kim Q. Do, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Schizophrenia, Related Troubles and Glutathione: Clinical Trial. Effects of Oral Administration of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) on the Brain Glutathione Level and on the Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Double-blind and Crossover Study

The results of the study "schizophrenia, related disorders and glutathione" conducted at the Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroscience (LUNEP) DUPA of Lausanne, reinforce the hypothesis proposed that a deficit intracerebral glutathione is a vulnerability factor for Schizophrenia at least for a subgroup of patients. While pursuing the baseline study, it is appropriate now to try to restore a higher level of glutathione in patients to see if this increase is accompanied by an improvement in symptoms, particularly negative symptoms and disorders cognitive, particularly resistant to current therapy. N-acetyl-cystein (NAC) is a precursor of glutathione which is used clinically for various indications, well tolerated even at high doses. The investigators propose a double-blind cross-over with the aim to study if the N-acetyl-cystein (at a dose of oral 2g/day) leads on the one hand a rising glutathione brain (measured in resonance magnetic spectroscopic) and also improved patients' conditions (determined by clinical assessments, psychopathological, neuropsychological, biochemical and physiological), while recording any side effects. As a first step, this study should include at least thirty patients and last for two to three years. It is important to note that this is not a study of medication suggested by a pharmaceutical industry, but a medical search.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The results of the study "schizophrenia, related disorders and glutathione" conducted at the Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroscience (LUNEP) DUPA of Lausanne, reinforce the hypothesis proposed that a deficit intracerebral glutathione is a vulnerability factor for Schizophrenia at least for a subgroup of patients. While pursuing the baseline study, it is appropriate now to try to restore a higher level of glutathione in patients to see if this increase is accompanied by an improvement in symptoms, particularly negative symptoms and disorders cognitive, particularly resistant to current therapy. N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) is a precursor of glutathione which is used clinically for various indications, well tolerated even at high doses. The investigators propose a double-blind cross-over with the aim to study if the N-acetyl-cystein (at a dose of oral 2g/day) leads on the one hand a rising glutathione brain (measured in resonance magnetic spectroscopic) and also improved patients' conditions (determined by clinical assessments, psychopathological, neuropsychological, biochemical and physiological), while recording any side effects. As a first step, this study should include at least thirty patients and last for two to three years. It is important to note that this is not a study of medication suggested by a pharmaceutical industry, but a medical search.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients (male or female, aged 18 to 65 years, QI>70) meeting the DSM-IV criteria (established by a senior psychiatrist) for schizophrenia and have the capacity to consent to the study. The study population include both inpatients and outpatients who are currently taking at least one of the following:Olanzapine, Clozapine, Haloperidol, Risperidone, Flupenthixol, or Fluphenazine. The following guidelines have been established for potential medication changes that patients may undergo during the course of the trial.
  • dose changes to existing medication (either increases or decreases in dose) will be accepted and participants will be allowed to continue with the trial.
  • A change in primary antipsychotics from one medication to another will require participants to withdrawn from the study.
  • An addiction of another antipsychotic, secondary to the existing antipsychotic treatment (primary antipsychotic) will be acceptable providing that there isn't a complete change from one antipsychotic to another.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • acute psychotic state, preventing the patient cooperation
  • co-morbidity with drug dependency
  • organic cerebral disease, major somatic diseases
  • abnormal renal, hepatic, thyroid or hematological findings
  • treatment with a regulator of mood(lithium, valproate, topiramate, lamotrigine et carbamazepine)
  • allergy to NAC
  • treatment with antioxidants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: patients who receive NAC first
this group will receive 2g/day of NAC (2 caps of 0.5g twice day)for a duration of 8 weeks first, and after this 8 weeks their receive placebo for 8 weeks.
Drug: N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC)
Once included, the patients will be randomly placed in two groups: one group (1) will receive 2 g/day of NAC (2caps of 0.5g twice a day) and the other group (2) a placebo, for a duration of 8 weeks. At the end of the 8 weeks, group (2) will receive NAC and (1) the placebo for another 8 weeks
Placebo Comparator: patients who receive placebo first
this patients will receive first placebo for a duration of 8 weeks, and after this 8 weeks their receive NAC for 8 weeks
Drug: N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC)
Once included, the patients will be randomly placed in two groups: one group (1) will receive 2 g/day of NAC (2caps of 0.5g twice a day) and the other group (2) a placebo, for a duration of 8 weeks. At the end of the 8 weeks, group (2) will receive NAC and (1) the placebo for another 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: 8 months
Improvment of the negative symptoms, measured with the PANSS: positive and negative syndrome scale". (Score:1= absence of the symptom - 7= extreme symptoms)
8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire (FCQ)
Time Frame: 8 months
Assessment of subjective troubles, " basic symptoms ": troubles of perceptive, cognitive or motor functions frequently observed in prodromal or remission phases.
8 months
Global Assessment of Functioning - (GAF)
Time Frame: 8 months
Assessment of the psychological, social and professional state of the patient at a given moment.
8 months
Clinical Global Impression - (CGI)
Time Frame: 8 months
Allows punctual evaluation of the severity of the disease, of the improvement and of the side effects
8 months
Neuropsychological evaluation
Time Frame: 8 months
The neuropsychological tests aim to assess cognitive functions : working memory, attention, planning; also include a WAIS
8 months
Neurological scales for the assessment of extrapyramidal symptoms
Time Frame: 8 months
AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale): quantitative assessment of secondary hyperkinesia (excluding tremor) due to neuroleptics.
8 months
• Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)
Time Frame: 8 months
A MRS method has originally been developed for the determination of brain GSH levels in vivo (Trabesinger et al., 1999), allowing us to observe a 51% GSH decrease in prefrontal cortex of schizophrenic patients (Do et al., 2000).
8 months
EEG/evoked potentials
Time Frame: 8 months
Anomalies of amplitude and latency of the P300 wave evoked under the "auditory oddball" paradigm are reliable neurophysiological markers of schizophrenia, correlating with the negative symptoms
8 months
Blood and fibroblasts biochemistry
Time Frame: 8 months
I. Plasma GSH and metabolites, plasma amino acids, particularly the sulfur containing ones II. activity of enzymes involved in GSH metabolism III. genetic analysis of enzymes involved in GSH metabolism IV. cell counts and tests of hepatic, renal and thyroid functions
8 months
Neurological scales for the assessment of extrapyramidal symptoms
Time Frame: 8 months
Simpson-Angus scale for extrapyramidal signs: tremor, rigidity, akinesia.
8 months
Neurological scales for the assessment of extrapyramidal symptoms
Time Frame: 8 months
Barnes scale: specific assessment of akathisia.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Kim Do, Professor, CNP/ LUNEP

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 17, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 106/03 CE

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings