Supplementation of Glutamine and Fish Oil Versus Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (GLUTFISH-HF)

November 26, 2020 updated by: Paolo Colombo, Columbia University

Effects of Glutamine and Fish Oil on Muscle Function in Heart Failure (GlutFish-HF)

The aim of this study is to determine whether supplementation of glutamine and fish oil can improve peripheral skeletal muscle function and metabolism in patients with heart failure. The investigators propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study comparing the combined supplementation of fish oil and glutamine with placebo in patients with stable heart failure. 30 patients with heart failure will be randomized to either receiving 6.5 g fish oil/d and 8 g glutamine/d (n=15) or placebo (n=15) for 90 days. The primary outcome in this study is the change in muscle functional capacity measured as changes in maximum muscle strength and fatigability, peak VO2 and exercise time after supplementation. A secondary outcome is the measurement of systemic and local markers of inflammation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age greater than 18 years,
  • left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35%,
  • stable on standard HF medications, and
  • optimal medical therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major cardiovascular events,
  • procedures in the last 6 months,
  • dementia,
  • presence of cardiovascular diseases that may lead to harm if the patient took part in the study (congenital heart disease, long QT syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, active myocarditis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
The placebo for fish oil will be safflower oil. For glutamine, soy powder will serve as the placebo.
Drug: Placebo
This is a prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. 38 subjects will be randomized to two groups (19 patients in each group), one taking active fish oil and glutamine supplementation and the other taking placebo for 90 days.
Active Comparator: Glutamine/Fishoil
3.285 g of EPA and 3.285 g of Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and L-alanyl-glutamine (8g/d).
Drug: Glutamine and Fish Oil Supplementation
This is a prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. 38 subjects will be randomized to two groups (19 patients in each group), one taking active fish oil and glutamine supplementation and the other taking placebo for 90 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Skeletal Muscle Function Capacity- Isometric Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isometric contractions, participants contracted against a constant 60-degree angle at the knee (dominant leg) and a constant 30 degree angle at the elbow (dominant arm) for 6 seconds. Participants alternated between flexion and extension, 3 repetitions each with a 30 second rest period between each. Data was collected to determine peak torque to body weight (peak torque (PKTQ)/ body weight (BW)).
Baseline
90 Day Skeletal Muscle Function Capacity- Isometric Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isometric contractions, participants contracted against a constant 60-degree angle at the knee (dominant leg) and a constant 30 degree angle at the elbow (dominant arm) for 6 seconds. Participants alternated between flexion and extension, 3 repetitions each with a 30 second rest period between each. Data was collected to determine peak torque to body weight (peak torque (PKTQ)/ body weight (BW)).
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Work (WK)/Body Weight (BW))
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Days Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Work (WK)/Body Weight (BW))
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Total Work)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Total Work)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Average Power)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Average Power)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Time to Peak Torque)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Time to Peak Torque)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Percent Change in Peak Effort Oxygen Consumption
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 Days
Peak effort oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is measured using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET).
Baseline to 90 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Systemic and Local Inflammation
Time Frame: Baseline
Systemic and local marker of inflammation as measured by tumor necrosis factor-alpha, units pg/mL
Baseline
90 Day Systemic and Local Inflammation
Time Frame: 90 Days
Systemic and local marker of inflammation as measured by tumor necrosis factor-alpha, units pg/mL
90 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paolo C. Colombo, MD, Columbia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAE8356

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings