Comparison of Minimal Versus Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in Coronary Surgery

January 11, 2021 updated by: Kyriakos Anastasiadis, AHEPA University Hospital

Research on Remote End-organ Protection, Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life With Implementation of the Novel Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation Circuit in Open Heart Surgery

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of minimal (MiECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation on perfusion characteristics and remote end-organ protection (lungs, brain, kidneys, liver, stomach, intestine), after elective coronary bypass grafting (CABG).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to investigate whether coronary surgery with minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation (MiECC) offers advantage over conventional CPB (CECC). In order to draw an evidence-based conclusion, the investigators aim to evaluate perfusion characteristics during coronary surgery with MECC and associated remote end-organ function. Improved end-organ protection translates into improved clinical outcome which greatly affects quality of life. This is the first study in the literature adequately powered to analyse organ pathophysiology during surgery with MECC and at the same time correlating common clinical variables with a detailed quality of life evaluation. Superiority of MECC could provide firm evidence towards widespread use of MECC in coronary surgery as standard of care.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Thessaloniki, Greece
        • Cardiothoracic Department, AHEPA University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of psychiatric disorder
  • inability to undergo neuropsychological assessment
  • history of transient ischemic attack or stroke
  • carotid artery stenosis > 60% assessed by duplex ultrasonography

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: MiECC group
Patients operated for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC).
Procedure: Coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation
We use a prototype AHEPA (modular type IV) circuit comprised of the standard and a standby accessory. Components of the standard circuit include: aortic cannula, three-stage venous cannula, coated tubing, a centrifugal pump, a new-generation membrane oxygenator with integrated arterial filter, a venous air removal device, a soft coated bag and pulmonary artery as well as aortic root vent. In addition, there is a standby hard-shell reservoir in parallel to the venous line, so as to convert the closed system to an open one. The standby component is bridged to the main circuit with an afferent line which is connected just before the VARD sending blood to the hard-shell reservoir and an efferent that re-directs it back to the VARD. A cell-saver device is added to the circuit for collecting shed blood and washing red blood cells for autotransfusion.
Active Comparator: CECC group
Patients operated for elective coronary artery bypass grafting under conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC).
Procedure: Coronary artery bypass grafting under conventional extracorporeal circulation
A standard open CPB circuit is used, consisting of uncoated PVC tubing, a hard-shell venous reservoir, a microporous membrane oxygenator (Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) and a roller pump (Stöckert S3, Munich, Germany). The circuit contains a 40 μm arterial line blood filter (Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) and it is primed with 1500 mL of a balanced crystalloid/colloid solution (1000 mL of Ringer's solution, 200 mL of mannitol 20%, and 300 mL of hydroxyethyl starch 6%). Cardiotomy as well as sump sucker are integrated to the circuit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remote end-organ perfusion and function (brain, lungs, liver, kidneys, stomach, intestine) intraoperatively and postoperatively during hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
Remote end-organ perfusion and function at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MiECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) that comprise: myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, stroke, renal failure.
Time Frame: 30 days
Postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) that comprise: myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, stroke, renal failure at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MiECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
30 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 30 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MiECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
30 days
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: 30 days
Length of ICU stay at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MiECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
30 days
Development of new postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Time Frame: 30 days
Development of new postoperative atrial fibrillation at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MiECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
30 days
Neurocognitive function
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Neurocognitive evaluation with a battery of specialized tests performed by a dedicated and experienced team in clinical psychology. Evaluation will be performed at specific time intervals: preoperatively, at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up.
6 months postoperatively
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Change in quality of life assessed with SF-36 questionnaire after coronary artery bypass grafting with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation.
6 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AHEPA University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kyriakos Anastasiadis, MD, PhD, FETCS, Cardiothoracic Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AHEPA_CTS_04

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings