Randomized Trial in knEe Osteoarthritis Using Low Intensity Ultrasound - Evaluating Feasibility (RELIEF) (RELIEF)
Can Very Low Intensity Ultrasound Therapy Improve Pain in People With Knee Osteoarthritis? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 1C7
- Regional Joint Assessment Program - HHS/SJHH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- over 40 years of age;
- have medial tibiofemoral compartment knee OA;
- have mild to moderate medial compartment radiographic OA severity (determined by the attending surgeon and/or Advanced Practice Physiotherapist on the basis of a standing x-ray or MRI scan depending upon which is available at initial consult);
- have stable ('not getting worse or better overall despite short-term fluctuations during the past three months') pain having an average intensity ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 on an 11-point verbal numeric rating scale, VNRS) in one knee which is aggravated by activity and eased with rest;
- limited pain from other lower extremity joints; and
- no change in first line pain medication in the past 2 months and willingness to forego alterations in pain medication for the duration of the study unless deemed medically necessary.
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of traumatic OA or previous surgical intervention in the knee or knee effusion;
- intra-articular injection of the knee in the previous 6 months;
- received ultrasound treatment for knee OA within the past 6 months;
- body weight changed ≥ 5% in the past 2 months;
- level of physical function insufficient to perform the required assessments or administer the intervention (e.g. intermittent claudication, severe peripheral neuropathy, active proliferative retinopathy, unstable cardiac or pulmonary disease, disabling stroke, chronic pain, arthritis in joints other than the study knee, bone fracture in the past 3 months);
- conditions listed as precautions or unknown safety risks for using the EXOGEN EXPRESS ultrasound device (pregnant or nursing women, individuals with thrombophlebitis, vascular insufficiency, abnormal skin sensitivity, sensory paralysis, open wound at the medial joint line of the knee, taking steroids/anti-coagulants, prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, calcium channel blocker or applying the EXOGEN EXPRESS in close proximity to someone wearing a cardiac pacemaker);
- unable to read, write and/or understand English;
- other illness or reasons judged by the participant, clinicians or researchers to make participation inadvisable (e.g. plans to move or travel, cognitive deficit resulting in difficulty comprehending and complying with instructions, caregiving demands/lack of social support for participation);
- unwillingness to sign informed consent; or
- participation in a competing study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Low intensity, pulsed ultrasound
|
1.5MHz, spatial average-temporal average intensity = 0.03W/cm2, pulsed (burst frequency 1kHz, burst duration 200µm, duty cycle 20%); self-administered to the medial side of the knee joint while sitting down for 20 minutes every day for 3 months.
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham ultrasound
|
no ultrasonic energy emitted; self-administered to the medial side of the knee joint while sitting down for 20 minutes every day for 3 months
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of recruitment
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Ability to recruit 30 participants over a 6 month period
|
6 months
|
|
Adherence to study protocol
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Percent adherence to the protocols for randomization, recruitment, intervention, and assessment
|
26 weeks
|
|
Rate of retention
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Number of participants completing the trial
|
26 weeks
|
|
Rate of all adverse events
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Participants will be asked about serious and non-serious adverse events weekly during the 13 week intervention phase and monthly during the 13 week follow up phase.
All adverse events will be recorded and addressed as indicated.
|
26 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)3.1NPR pain subscale
Time Frame: 13 weeks
|
Change from baseline in pain at 13 weeks
|
13 weeks
|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)3.1NPR physical function subscale
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Change from baseline in Physical Function at 26 weeks
|
26 weeks
|
|
6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Change from baseline distance (metres) walked in 6 minutes at 26 weeks
|
26 weeks
|
|
SF-36 (RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Change from baseline in Health Related Quality of Life at 26 weeks
|
26 weeks
|
|
Global Rating of Disease Severity
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Change from baseline in Global Rating of Disease Severity at 13 and 26 weeks will be assessed using an 11-point scale ('Considering all the ways that your knee arthritis affects you, please rate how you are doing on a scale from 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor))
|
26 weeks
|
|
11-point Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS)
Time Frame: 0 and 13 weeks
|
Change from baseline in pain intensity (average, minimum and maximum over the past 24 hours and following physical performance tests)
|
0 and 13 weeks
|
|
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Change from baseline in physical function at 26 weeks
|
26 weeks
|
|
Stair Climb test
Time Frame: 26 weeks
|
Time (seconds) to ascend and descend a staircase with 9 steps
|
26 weeks
|
|
Perceived change
Time Frame: 13 and 26 weeks
|
Perceived change from baseline will be assessed at 13 and 26 weeks using an 11-point scale ('With respect to your OA knee treated with ultrasound, how would you describe yourself now compared to baseline assessment?' -5 = a very great deal worse, 0 = about the same, +5 = a very great deal better)
|
13 and 26 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Norma J MacIntyre, PT, PhD, McMaster University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- EX-KOA-1206
- EX-KOA-xxxxxx (Other Grant/Funding Number: Smith & Nephew, Inc)
- MTP 108229/MTO 108232 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Canadian Institutes of Health Research)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.