Preemie Tots: A Pilot Study to Understand the Effects of Prematurity in Toddlerhood

December 11, 2018 updated by: Sarah Keim
The purpose of this study is to examine whether supplementation with certain polyunsaturated fatty acids can help development and behavior of children born preterm.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Child born at less than or equal to 29 completed weeks' gestation;
  2. Child between 18 months, 0 days and 38 months, 30 days old chronological age;
  3. Child admitted to NICU and/or had a Neonatology Clinic follow up visit scheduled.
  4. Child showing some autistic symptoms;
  5. Child between the 5th and 95th percentiles (per WHO growth chart) for weight at his/her most recent hospital visit;
  6. English spoken in the home, demonstrate ability to communicate in English well-enough to understand study, informed consent, and study questionnaires; and
  7. Have informed consent on file.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Consume LCPUFA supplement drops, chews, powders, Pediasure, or fatty fish more than 2x per week;
  2. Unable to tolerate venipuncture;
  3. Any major malformation that would preclude participation;
  4. Cerebral Palsy (quadriparesis only);
  5. Deafness;
  6. Blindness;
  7. Bleeding disorder;
  8. Type I diabetes;
  9. Fragile X Syndrome, Rett Syndrome, Angelman Syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis;
  10. Non febrile seizure in the last month without a clear and resolved etiology;
  11. Feeding problem that may inhibit full participation;
  12. Known fish allergy;
  13. Known canola/rapeseed allergy or sensitivity; or
  14. Recorded score of <70 on Bayley Cognitive Section within the past year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: LCPUFA Oil Supplement
EPA + DHA + GLA + OA oil supplement
Drug: LCPUFA oil supplement

2.5mL per day for 90 days

Daily Dose: EPA (338mg) + DHA (225mg) + GLA (83mg) + OA (200mg)
Placebo Comparator: Canola Oil Placebo
Other: Canola Oil Placebo
2.5mL per day for 90 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Behavior - Pervasive Developmental Disorders Screening Test-II Stage 2
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 days post randomization
The Pervasive Developmental Disorders Screening Test-II stage 2 (PDDST-II) is a 14-item measure designed to discriminate Autism Spectrum Disorders from a related non-autistic developmental disorder in children ages 12 to 48 months old. The min score is 0 and the max score is 14. Scores equal to or greater than five yield a positive screen for autism. PDDST-II scores were measured at baseline and then again at study completion (90 days post randomization). The scores were calculated as the PDDST-II value at 90 days minus the PDDST-II value at baseline.
Baseline to 90 days post randomization
Child Behavior-Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA)
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 days post randomization
Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) is a 42 item tool that is useful for identifying social-emotional problems and/or deficits in children. BITSEA includes the following subscales: Competence (11 Items, min score:0, max score:22), problem behaviors--dysregulation (8 items, min score:0, max score:16) , externalizing (6 items, min score:0, max score:12), internalizing (8 items, min score:0, max score:16), Autism Spectrum Disorder (17 Items, min score:0, max score:34), and Red Flags (14 items, min score:0, max score:28).The questions overlap and the problem subscale is a combination of dysregulation, externalizing, and internalizing. Higher problem scores indicate greater levels of social-emotional/behavioral problems. Lower Competence scores indicate possible delay/deficit. Scores were measured at baseline and then again at study completion (90 days post randomization). The change in BITSEA scores were calculated as the value at 90 days - the value at baseline.
Baseline to 90 days post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatty Acid
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 days post randomization
The secondary outcome measures in this trial involve an examination of change in fatty acids from the first study visit to the final study visit.
Baseline to 90 days post randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: Future Full-scale Multi-site Study
Time Frame: Pre-baseline to 90 days post randomization
Feasibility of a future full-scale multi-site study is assessed by examining the number of children screened, the proportion of these children who screen positive for ASD, the number of children who agree to participate in the trial, the number of children who return for the second and third study visits, baseline differences in individual fatty acids between the intervention and comparison groups, and adherence to the assigned treatment.
Pre-baseline to 90 days post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sarah Keim

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cures Within Reach
Marci and Bill Ingram Fund for Autism Spectrum Disorders Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 752311

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preterm Birth

Clinical Trials on LCPUFA oil supplement

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings