Comparison of Epidural and TAP Block in Abdominal Surgery

November 22, 2023 updated by: University of Nebraska

Comparison of Epidural Analgesia With Bilateral Dual TAP Infiltration Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine in Patients With Major Abdominal Surgery

This study will compare the infiltrative transversusabdominis plane (TAP) block with liposomal bupivacaine to epidural analgesia (EA) in major abdominal surgery . The efficacy of the TAP block for abdominal surgery is well documented in literature, but there are no studies utilizing long-acting bupivacaine. The investigators believe the study will demonstrate no difference between the two in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption, but TAP blocks will decreased costs, urinary retention, and hypotension.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study intends to examine this rational by comparing the infiltrative transversusabdominis plane (TAP) block with liposomal bupivacaine to EA in major abdominal surgery. The efficacy of the TAP block for abdominal surgery is well documented in the literature, but there are no studies utilizing long-acting bupivacaine. The investigators believe the primary outcome will demonstrate no difference between the two in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption. The investigators anticipate that patients who have undergone TAP blocks will have improved secondary outcomes with respect to a decreased costs, urinary retention, and hypotension.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
        • University Of Nebraska Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult subjects undergoing major abdominal surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subject >/= 19 years of age
  • Undergoing major abdominal surgery
  • able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic opioid use
  • allergies to amide anesthetics
  • inability to undergo general anesthesia
  • pregnancy
  • any existence of contraindications to regional anesthesia in the presence of antiplatelet or anticoagulative drugs
  • or evidence of gross neurological dysfunction of the lower extremity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Epidural
The skin will be disinfected with 2% chlorhexidine. Under sterile technique, the epidural will be placed. Epidural catheter will be placed at thoracic vertebral levels T5 to T10. Level chosen as clinically indicated. The epidural solution should contain institution's standard solution of Bupivicaine 0.05% and hydromorphone 10 mcg/cc. However, solution type should be clinically indicated.
Drug: Epidural
The skin will be disinfected with 2% chlorhexidine. Under sterile technique, the epidural will be placed. Epidural catheter will be placed at thoracic vertebral levels T5 to T10. Level chosen as clinically indicated. The epidural solution should contain institution's standard solution of Bupivicaine 0.05% and hydromorphone 10 mcg/cc. However, solution type should be clinically indicated.
Other Names:
  • local anesthetic
TAP Block
The skin will be disinfected with 2% chlorhexidine. The bilateral dual TAP infiltrative blocks will be placed using high-frequency ultrasound. The TAP blocks will be performed using lipospheric bupivacaine (Exparel) with the following dosing regimen.A 266mg (20cc) vial of lipospheric bupivacaine will be equally into 2 30 ml syringes using strict sterile technique. The solution will be diluted in each syringe with 20cc preservative free sterile 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 30 ml in each syringe. Once the transversus abdominal plane is identified then a 5-10 ml of plain 0.9% normal saline will be injected to open the fascial plane. Once the plane is opened then the 15cc of diluted lipospheric bupivacaine will be administered under direct ultrasound visualization in all 4 TAP quadrants (subcostal position x2 and lateral position x2)
Drug: TAP Block
The skin will be disinfected with 2% chlorhexidine. The bilateral dual TAP infiltrative blocks will be placed using high-frequency ultrasound. The TAP blocks will be performed using lipospheric bupivacaine (Exparel) with the following dosing regimen.A 266mg (20cc) vial of lipospheric bupivacaine will be equally into 2 30 ml syringes using strict sterile technique. The solution will be diluted in each syringe with 20cc preservative free sterile 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 30 ml in each syringe. Once the transversus abdominal plane is identified then a 5-10 ml of plain 0.9% normal saline will be injected to open the fascial plane. Once the plane is opened then the 15cc of diluted lipospheric bupivacaine will be administered under direct ultrasound visualization in all 4 TAP quadrants (subcostal position x2 and lateral position x2)
Other Names:
  • transversus abdominis plane, abdominal muscle anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores
Time Frame: 96 hours post-op
Comparison of pain scores (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain possible)
96 hours post-op
Opioid Consumption in a 24-Hour period
Time Frame: 96 hours post-op
A comparison of opioid consumption in a 24-Hour period at 96 hours post-op between the interventions
96 hours post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of 96-hour hospital stay costs
Time Frame: 96 hours post-op
Comparison of 96-hour hospital stay cost between the interventions
96 hours post-op
Comparison of urinary failure/catheter acquired infection rates
Time Frame: 96 hours post-op
Comparison of urinary failure/catheter acquired infection rates between the interventions
96 hours post-op
Comparison of hypotension rates
Time Frame: 96 hours post-op
Comparison hypotension rates between the interventions
96 hours post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Nebraska

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas A Nicholas, MD, University of Nebraska

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0287-13-FB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings