Multicenter Withdrawal Clinical Trials of N-acetyl Glucosamine Capsule for IBS-D Treatment

July 23, 2015 updated by: Liujunkang, Third Military Medical University

Multicenter Randomized Withdrawal Clinical Trials of N-acetyl Glucosamine Capsule for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D) Treatment

This study is a withdrawal randomized clinical trail to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1.1 chemical drugs N-acetyl glucosamine on Chinese IBS-D patients coming from four centers in chongqing. 180 IBS-D patients in this research are accord with the Rome III diagnostic criteria, screening/import period pain intensity scores of the NRS week mean value are 3.0 plus and the days which at least more than one time a stool type are 6 or 7 type over 2 days/week. Test cycle includes screening/import period (2 weeks), open treatment period (8 weeks), a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal period (8 weeks), the main outcome measures are pain intensity (NRS score 11 point scale) and stool type ( Bristol type). And secondary endpoints included overall symptoms sensory scores, defecation frequency, abdominal distension, mucous stool and quality of life parameters (IBS-36 scale). After the end of the treatment period, the participants whose pain intensity and stool type are effective subjects into a randomized withdrawal period, analysis and comparison of the difference between treatment group and placebo group withdrawal rate and curative effect index score reduces.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
180

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Recruiting
        • Daping Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Dongfeng Chen, doctor
          • Phone Number: 13883032812

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Man or woman, aged 18 to 65 years, inclusive.
  • Based on the Roman III diagnostic criteria for diagnosis of IBS-D subjects, recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort (hard to describe the discomfort of pain), monthly attack within the past 3months at least 3 days. With two or more of the following three kinds of symptoms:

At least a portion of the time abdominal pain or defecate increase when discomfort.

At least a portion of the time abdominal pain or the row of loose stools when discomfort.

At least a portion of the time abdominal pain or discomfort improved after defecation.

Symptoms for at least 6 months before diagnosis

  • Screening/import period pain intensity scores of the NRS week mean value are 3.0 plus and the days which at least more than one time a stool type are 6 or 7 type over 2 days/week.
  • Voluntarily signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The absorption of any known adverse
  • History of gastrointestinal surgery ( not including appendectomy)
  • History of organic gastrointestinal diseases: IBS, cancer etc.
  • History of chronic diseases: anemia (hemoglobin<90g/L), pulmonary tuberculosis, diabetes or cardiovascular, liver, kidney, brain, and hematopoietic system and other serious diseases and psychiatric patients, AST(aspartate aminotransferase), ALT (alanine aminotransferase)> 1.5 times, BUN (blood urea nitrogen)> 1.2 times, Cr > 1.0 times normal.
  • The disease of lactose intolerance, gallstones, endometriosis, easily confused with IBS symptoms of ;
  • Progressive weight loss;
  • Concomitant medication is unable to stop but affect the gastrointestinal movement and function in the experiment, such as antibiotic drugs, the drugs of regulating the intestinal microecology;
  • Concomitant medication use continuously for more than a week but affect the gastrointestinal movement and function in the experiment, such as parasympathetic inhibitors, nondepolarizing agent, antidiarrheal, opioid formulation, etc;
  • Other researchers think not suitable for the list;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Starch capsule
During the two weeks screening phase of the study, the daily dose of 3 tablets will be taken before breakfast, lunch and supper.
Drug: placebo
Experimental: N-acetyl-D-glucosamine
During the 8-week treatment phase of the study,the dose of 100mg(3 tablets)per day will be taken.
Drug: N-acetyl-D-glucosamine
Other Names:
  • Atysamine (ATSM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal Pain Intensity
Time Frame: one and a half years
As measured by numerical rating scale
one and a half years
Stool Consistency
Time Frame: one and a half years
As measured by Bristol ' s scale
one and a half years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General symptoms feel grading
Time Frame: one and a half years
As measure by patient reported outcome measures
one and a half years
defecation frequency
Time Frame: one and a half years
As measure by patient reported outcome measures
one and a half years
abdominal distension
Time Frame: one and a half years
As measure by patient reported outcome measures
one and a half years
mucous stool
Time Frame: one and a half years
As measure by patient reported outcome measures
one and a half years
life quality parameters
Time Frame: one and a half years
As measure by healthy survey, SF-36
one and a half years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Third Military Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Junkang Liu, Doctor, Third MMU

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • liujunkang
  • dongying (Other Grant/Funding Number: Dongying leader pharmaceutical co.,LTD)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings