Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina Using Estrogen (IMPROVE)

August 23, 2023 updated by: David Rahn, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
This study randomizes postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse planning native tissue transvaginal surgical repair to 6-8 weeks of preoperative and 1-year continued postoperative vaginal estrogen cream compared to placebo cream. This clinical trial and basic science investigation are designed to understand the mechanisms by which local estrogen treatment affects connective tissues of the pelvic floor and determine whether its use before and after prolapse repair will (i) improve success rates of the surgical intervention and minimize prolapse recurrence and (ii) impact favorably upon symptoms of other pelvic floor disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a double-blind randomized trial of intravaginal estrogen (conjugated estrogens, 0.625mg/1g cream) vs. placebo in postmenopausal women (up to n=222 enrolled and randomized in order for 188 to undergo surgery) with symptomatic prolapse beyond the hymen planning transvaginal native tissue repairs. Medication will be started >5 weeks before surgery and continued for 1 year postoperatively, i.e. until scar remodeling is complete. The investigators aim to determine if pre- and postoperative intravaginal estrogen therapy (i) results in anatomic and patient-reported subjective improvement in pelvic organ support, and (ii) impacts other pelvic floor disorders (overactive bladder and incontinence, sexual function and pain, postoperative cystitis), satisfaction, quality of life, and vaginal wound healing. Finally, (iii) the investigators will determine the potential mechanisms by which local estrogen treatment alters pelvic organ support by examining full-thickness vaginal wall biopsies taken at the time of surgery for histologic, connective tissue, and smooth muscle synthesis and degradative changes. The investigators expect this will highlight other novel targets for future therapies in prolapse repair and prevention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
206

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
        • Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal: no menses for >1 year
  • Minimum age: 48 years
  • Symptomatic apical and/or anterior vaginal wall prolapse, stage 2 or greater
  • No estrogen replacement within the last month (may come off current treatment, i.e. wash out, to join the study)
  • Medically fit for elective surgery
  • Physically able to apply/insert the study drug
  • Available for clinic follow-up for minimum 1yr

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent use of steroid creams for other indications (e.g. lichen sclerosis)
  • BMI >35 kg/m2
  • Recent history (within last month) of vaginal infection or vaginitis
  • Contraindications to estrogen therapy (e.g. spontaneous DVT, stroke, breast or endometrial/ hormone-responsive cancer, genital bleeding of unknown cause)
  • History of connective tissue disease
  • Any oral or transdermal estrogen, SERM, or other medication impacting vaginal milieu
  • History of vaginal irradiation
  • Allergy to Premarin or its constituents
  • Prior apical repair or use of mesh for prolapse repair
  • Current tobacco use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Cream
Placebo cream
Drug: Placebo Cream
1g applied vaginally nightly for 2 weeks then 2x/week for >5 weeks before surgery, then 2x/week for 1 year after surgery.
Experimental: Estrogen Cream
Conjugated Estrogens cream
Drug: Conjugated Estrogens Cream
0.625mg/1g cream, 1g applied vaginally nightly for 2 weeks then 2x/week for >5 weeks before surgery, then 2x/week for 1 year after surgery.
Other Names:
  • Premarin Vaginal Cream

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical "Failure" Defined by (i) Anatomic Assessment of Prolapse, (ii) Presence of Bulge Symptoms, and/or (Iii) Retreatment of Prolapse
Time Frame: 12 months
Cumulative failures, as measured by (i) anatomic assessment of prolapse, (ii) presence of bulge symptoms, and/or (iii) retreatment of pelvic organ prolapse
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Condition Specific (i.e. Pelvic Organ Prolapse) Symptom Bother as Measured by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
Questionnaire score at 12 months in overall condition-specific symptom bother as measured by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire, which is scored from 0-300, higher scores being worse (i.e., more distressing)
12 months
Condition Specific (i.e. Pelvic Organ Prolapse) Quality of Life as Measured by Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)
Time Frame: 12 months
Questionnaire score at 12 months in overall condition-specific quality of life as measured by Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7) questionnaire, which is scored from 0-300, higher scores being worse (i.e., more distressing)
12 months
Generic Quality of Life as Measured by SF-12 Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
Generic (physical component) quality of life as measured by SF-12 questionnaire at 12 months. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical functioning; the US population average is 50 points.
12 months
Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) Questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6
Time Frame: Time of surgery
Urinary symptom bother as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating greater symptom bother.
Time of surgery
Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) Questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6
Time Frame: 12 months
Urinary symptom bother as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating greater symptom bother.
12 months
Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: Time of surgery
Urinary symptom impact on quality of life as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating worse impact on quality of life.
Time of surgery
Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
Urinary symptom impact on quality of life as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating worse impact on quality of life.
12 months
Sexual Function as Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR)
Time Frame: Time of surgery
Sexual function in sexually-active women as measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). The score ranges from 1 (worse sexual experience) to 5 (better sexual experience) with midrange scores commonly seen in women with pelvic floor disorders.
Time of surgery
Sexual Function as Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR)
Time Frame: 12 months
Sexual function in sexually-active women as measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). The score ranges from 1 (worse sexual experience) to 5 (better sexual experience) with midrange scores commonly seen in women with pelvic floor disorders.
12 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of participants reporting any adverse events from baseline randomization to 12 months postoperatively
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pfizer
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David D Rahn, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STU 022015-117

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings