Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

February 20, 2018 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Inflammatory bowel disease is a condition caused by gastrointestinal immune system dysregulation and affected by both genetic and environmental factors. Differences in intestinal bacteria exist between IBD patients and healthy controls, but the role of intestinal bacteria in the development and treatment of IBD remains largely unknown. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of gastrointestinal bacteria from a healthy donor to a patient with altered microbial diversity with the intent of restoring a normal bacterial balance. Most studies focus on its use in treating Clostridium difficile (CDI), an infection characterized by dysbiosis. Given the role of dysbiosis in IBD, the investigators hypothesize that FMT may be beneficial in IBD. The purpose of this study is to prospectively examine the safety of FMT in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with significant morbidity and mortality. Current therapies remain limited by side effects and loss of response over time, and there is an ongoing need for new therapies. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which has proven to be safe and effective in the management of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been proposed as a therapy for UC. There have been studies examining the role of FMT in UC, but they have shown mixed results, and have not examined the underlying immunologic and microbial changes to explain how and why FMT works from specific donors and in certain recipients. Furthermore, no studies have examined the long-term safety of FMT in patients with UC. This proposal aims to examine: (a) the short- and long-term safety of FMT in patients with UC, (b) the efficacy of FMT as a therapy for mild-moderate UC, and (c) the microbial and immunologic changes that occur after FMT, to help understand how and why it works in this group of patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Weill Cornell Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with biopsy proven ulcerative colitis (UC), including those with inadequately controlled UC (flare) as defined by failure of standard medical therapy, steroid-dependence, and/or need for escalation of medical care as determined by severity index (Mayo Score), endoscopic or histologic study, and/or medical provider
  • Have active disease, defined with a Mayo Score > 3 and Mayo endoscopic subscore >1
  • Subjects whom the investigator believes can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol
  • Able to provide informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy-proven Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis
  • Acute abdomen or other clinical emergencies requiring emergent management (for example: stricture, bowel obstruction, perforation and/or abscess)
  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
  • Pregnancy
  • Concurrent Clostridium difficile infection or other known infection
  • Prior history of fecal microbiota transplantation
  • Other causes of diarrhea, including but not limited to tube feeds and medications (for example, kayaxelate, metformin, lactulose, laxatives, magnesium)
  • Major congenital defects
  • Subjects with recent malignancy in the last 5 years, excluding non-melanoma skin malignancies
  • Anaphylactic reactions to any foods
  • Any antibiotic use within the last 3 months
  • Subject having any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardize the safety or rights of the participant participating in the study, would make it unlikely for the participant to complete the study, or would confound the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Individuals with Ulcerative Colitis will undergo a fecal microbiota transplantation.
Biological: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
We will use fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), with fecal material obtained from OpenBiome or donor directed, to assess safety (as primary outcome) and efficacy (as secondary outcome) in adult (>18 year old) patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety post-FMT as determined by interview for adverse events
Time Frame: 36 months post-FMT
Patient information regarding adverse events and safety of FMT for UC will be collected throughout the study period, including day 0, weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 24, and then every 6 months until 36 months post-FMT. Throughout the study period, patients will be assessed for safety with questions regarding general well-being (such as "how have you been feeling?"), as well as specific questions to evaluate for occurrence of adverse events. Patients will also be questioned regarding stool form and frequency, presence of abdominal pain, fevers and subjective well-being.
36 months post-FMT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission
Time Frame: 2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Defined by Mayo score ≤ 2 without any subscore >1, and Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1
2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Clinical Response
Time Frame: 2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Defined by decrease in Mayo score by 3 points, decrease in bleeding subscore by 1, or absolute subscore of 0-1
2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Progression of disease defined by initiation of anti-TNF agents
Time Frame: 2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Initiation of anti-TNF agents (such as infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab), vedolizumab, steroids. Includes time gap until additional agents are started
2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Progression of disease defined by increase in dosages of current UC medications
Time Frame: 2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Increase in dosages of current ulcerative colitis specific medications
2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Progression of disease defined by time to colectomy
Time Frame: up to three year follow-up period post fecal microbiota transplantation
Time to colectomy rates and increase in time to colectomy
up to three year follow-up period post fecal microbiota transplantation
Death secondary to UC
Time Frame: Anytime during the three year follow-up period post fecal microbiota transplantation
Time to death secondary to ulcerative colitis
Anytime during the three year follow-up period post fecal microbiota transplantation
Progression of disease defined by clinical flare
Time Frame: 2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Time to next flare
2, 4 and 12 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Microbial changes
Time Frame: 0, 2 and 4 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
- Alterations in microbial profiles as defined by sequence of genetic material from fecal material.
0, 2 and 4 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
Immunological changes
Time Frame: 0, 2 and 4 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation
- Alterations in immune cell function as defined by RNA sequencing and flow cytometry
0, 2 and 4 weeks post fecal microbiota transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Carl V Crawford, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1404014982

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical Trials on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings