Efficacy and Safety of Chondron (Autologus Chondrocyte) in Patients With Cartilage Defects in Their Ankle

April 2, 2026 updated by: Cellontech Co., Ltd.

A Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Chondron (Autologus Chondrocyte) in Patients With Cartilage Defects in Their Ankle for 18 Months

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chondron (Autologus Chondrocyte) in patients with cartilage defects in their ankle for 18 months

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open label trial, involving a total of 28 subjects. Subjects who give consent will be screened and those who meet trial criteria will receive CHONDRON (Autologous cultured Chondrocyte) by transplant. During the trial period, subjects must follow the instructions given by principal investigator. Subjects will make 6* hospital visits on a regular basis inclusive of hospitalization. During these visits subjects will be examined. For the evaluation of safety and efficacy of CHONDRON, examination with doctors, x-ray, MRI tests and arthroscopy will be performed. *If tissue samples can be collected at screening visit, there will be only 5 visits.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • South Korea
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
        • MyongJi Hospital
    • Seoul
      • Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
        • Eulji General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects aged 15 to 65 years
  • Patients with MRI-confirmed partial cartilage defects of the ankle (≤15 cm² single lesion, ≤20 cm² multiple lesions)
  • Patients who have undergone correction for malalignment, ligament instability, or bone defects (if applicable)
  • Patients with normal surrounding cartilage
  • Patients with ICRS Grade III or IV cartilage defects
  • Subjects who provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to bovine protein or gentamicin
  • Inflammatory or autoimmune arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout)
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy
  • Tumors or serious comorbid conditions
  • History of radiotherapy or chemotherapy within 2 years
  • Uncontrolled diabetes or diabetes with complications
  • Active infection requiring antibiotics
  • Current corticosteroid therapy
  • Patients with mental illness or other conditions deemed unsuitable for this study by the clinical trial manager

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Autologous cultured Chondrocyte
Subjects who give consent will be screened and those who meet trial criteria will receive CHONDRON (Autologous cultured Chondrocyte) by transplant.
Drug: CHONDRON
  1. Harvesting of ankle or knee cartilage
  2. The cells that fill the vial are sufficiently suspended, and a sufficient amount of suspension is grafted in the defect with fibrin glue.
Other Names:
  • Autologous cultured Chondrocyte

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grade change of ICRS(International Cartilage Repair Society) by arthroscopy
Time Frame: 12 months after the surgery
The change of ICRS grade of the affected ankle shall be assessed at 12 months after the surgery. The results on the surgery date shall be considered the baseline data and shall be compared with those at 12 months after the surgery based on arthroscopy. For the final efficacy evaluation, the percentage of the patients (success rate) who showed Grade III or IV ICRS before the surgery and improved to Grade 0 or I after the surgery will be calculated.
12 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score change of AOFAS(American orthopedic foot & ankle society) Score
Time Frame: baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
The improvements in the AOFAS in the affected ankle at baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery will be compared. The final efficacy evaluation shall be done by calculating the difference between the AOFAS at the baseline and that 18 months after the surgery.
baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
Hannover Score
Time Frame: baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
The improvements in the Hannover score in the affected ankle at baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery will be compared. The final efficacy evaluation shall be done by calculating the difference between the Hannover score at the baseline and that 18 months after the surgery.
baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
Score change of Evaluation by physician in charge
Time Frame: six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
The improvement will be evaluated by the physician using a five-level scale six, 12 and 18 months after the Chondron grafting.
six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
Score change of 100mmVAS(visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
The improvements of pain in the 100mmVAS in the affected ankle at baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery will be compared. The final efficacy evaluation shall be done by calculating the difference between the 100mmVAS at the baseline and that 18 months after the surgery.
baseline and six, 12 and 18 months after the surgery
Comparing MRI results
Time Frame: baseline and 18 months after the surgery
The morphological improvement from MRI image of the affected ankle will be assessed at 18 months after the surgery from those at baseline. For MRI image at baseline, the MRI should be performed within two weeks from the Chondron grafting for the efficacy evaluation.
baseline and 18 months after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cellontech Co., Ltd.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jin Su Kim, MD, Eulji General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Ki Hyuck Sung, MD, MyongJi Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 04CON

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings