Efficiency of Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Treatment in Adult Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (completed growth)
- Maxillary and mandibular overcrowding
- Patient demand for orthodontic treatment
- Adequate dento-oral health
- ASA I and ASA II
- Compliance with clinic visits every 2 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- A need for tooth extraction
- A need for orthodontic temporary anchorage devices
- A history of periodontal disease
- Smokers
- Altered bone metabolism (e.g., due to anti-resorptive drug, steroid or immunosuppressant use)
- Mental or motor disabilities
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Treated with conventional orthodontics
|
Damon self-ligating systems (Ormco, Orange, Calif) were used for all patients.
The patients were allowed to choose between clear or metal brackets.
The bonding method was standardized and applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
After bracket bonding, 0.014-in copper-nickel-titanium Damon arch forms were placed.
The subjects were recalled every two weeks, and the archwires were changed only when full bracket engagement was achieved.
The sequence of archwires was as follows: 0.018-in, 0.014x0.025-in
and 0.018x0.025-in
copper nickel-titanium archwires for alignment; and 0.019x0.025-in
stainless steel archwires for fine-tuning.
Following the alignment steps, impressions were taken, and blinded orthodontic consultants validated appliance removal or provided advice regarding further adjustments.
Alginate impressions were taken after the removal of the appliances, and both fixed and removable retainers were placed.
|
|
Experimental: Test group
subjected to piezo-assisted orthodontics
|
Damon self-ligating systems (Ormco, Orange, Calif) were used for all patients.
The patients were allowed to choose between clear or metal brackets.
The bonding method was standardized and applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
After bracket bonding, 0.014-in copper-nickel-titanium Damon arch forms were placed.
The subjects were recalled every two weeks, and the archwires were changed only when full bracket engagement was achieved.
The sequence of archwires was as follows: 0.018-in, 0.014x0.025-in
and 0.018x0.025-in
copper nickel-titanium archwires for alignment; and 0.019x0.025-in
stainless steel archwires for fine-tuning.
Following the alignment steps, impressions were taken, and blinded orthodontic consultants validated appliance removal or provided advice regarding further adjustments.
Alginate impressions were taken after the removal of the appliances, and both fixed and removable retainers were placed.
The piezocisionTM surgery was performed one week after orthodontic appliance placement .
The patients received local anesthesia in both arches, and vertical interproximal micro-incisions were created below each interdental papilla.
In cases of root proximity (i.e., less than 2 mm of interdental bone), this procedure was not applied.
These incisions were kept to a minimum (varying from 5 mm to 8 mm).
Next, using a vertical piezoelectric device, 5-mm long and 3-mm deep corticotomies were made, and no subsequent sutures were required needed (figure 1).
The patients were advised to take analgesics (paracetamol) only if necessary and to record their daily intakes for one week.
Anti-inflammatories were prohibited to avoid interference with the RAP.
Careful tooth brushing and the use of a mouthwash (chlorhexidine 0.2% Perio-Aid, Dentaid Benelux, Houten, Netherlands) were recommended for 7 days.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall treatment time measurement (in days)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Comparaison of the overall treatment time between the test group (piezocision group) and the control group will be performed.
It will be evaluated by measuring the time (in days) between the placement and the debond of the orthodontic appliance.
The hypothesis is that piezocision accelerate orthodontic tooth movement.
|
3 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Root resorption parameters measurements (intrabuccal radiographic in millimeters)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
A comparaison of orthodontic parameters (root resorption) between the test group and the control group before and after orthodontic treatment will be performed.
The root resorption will be measured in intrabuccal radiographic (millimeters) on the day of the placement of this appliance and at the debond.
|
3 years
|
|
Comparaison of periodontal parameters between the test group and the control group before (at baseline) and after orthodontic treatment.
Time Frame: 3 years
|
3 years
|
|
|
Patient-centered outcomes (VAS questionnaire)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Satisfaction post treatment using a VAS questionnaire and analgesic consumption (milligrams of paracetamol) during 7 days after the placement of the orthodontic appliance.
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- H2013-3
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tooth Overcrowding
-
NCT03406130Completed
-
NCT07447674Not yet recruitingEmergency Department Overcrowding
-
NCT07123857RecruitingEmergency Medicine | Triage | Emergency Department Triage | Emergency Department Overcrowding
-
NCT05201664RecruitingTooth Extrusion | Tooth Fracture | Tooth Avulsion | Tooth Extruded
-
NCT07302581RecruitingDental Caries | Tooth Extraction | Tooth Fractures | Tooth Dislocation
-
NCT07595198Not yet recruitingPlatelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) vs Bone Graft With Membrane for Ridge Preservation After Tooth ExtractionRoot; Fracture | Tooth Fracture | Tooth Crown Fracture | Extraction, Tooth
-
NCT06778590RecruitingTooth Disease | Facial Swelling | Tooth Extraction Status Nos | Tooth Avulsion | Tooth Impacted | Piezoelectric Technique | Germectomy
-
NCT05202093Completed
Clinical Trials on Orthodontic procedures (for both groups : Control group and Test group)
-
NCT05301491CompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain
-
NCT04146740CompletedGestational Diabetes Mellitus
-
NCT05373797Completed
-
NCT07002151CompletedRelapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
-
NCT06168500CompletedDental Implant | Bone Regeneration | Narrow Implant
-
NCT06299579RecruitingAcute Ischemic Stroke
-
NCT06288893Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05674981Completed
-
NCT06779786Completed
-
NCT07262151CompletedCancer | Anxiety | Palliative Care | Cancer Pain | Music Therapy