The Effects of WBV on Muscle Stiffness and Reflex Activity in Stroke.

December 7, 2018 updated by: Marco Yiu-Chung Pang, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

The Effects of Whole Body Vibration (WBV) on Muscle Stiffness and Reflex Activity in People After Stroke.

Spastic hypertonia is common after stroke. Whole-body vibration (WBV) is known to have modulatory effects of muscle reflex activity and blood flow in other populations and thus have potential applications in the management of spastic hypertonia post-stroke. This study aims to investigate the acute effect of WBV on leg muscle H-reflex, stiffness, and blood perfusion in people with chronic stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Spastic hypertonia is common after stroke. Whole-body vibration (WBV) is known to have modulatory effects of muscle reflex activity and blood flow in other populations and thus have potential applications in management of spastic hypertonia post-stroke. However, the potential effects of WBV on leg muscle stiffness in stroke rehabilitation remains unknown. Scientific evidence is warranted to fill the knowledge gap.

Purpose This study aims to investigate the acute effect of WBV on leg muscle H-reflex, stiffness and blood perfusion in people with chronic stroke.

Methods Individuals with chronic stroke will be recruited from community self-help groups and existing patient database. Relevant information (e.g. demographic information, medical history) will be obtained from medical records and subject interviews. Each subject will have to fulfill the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosis of chronic stroke, (2) community-dwelling, (3) able to follow simple verbal instructions. Exclusion criteria are: (1) other diagnoses of neurological conditions, (2) significant musculoskeletal conditions (e.g. amputations), (3) metal implants in the lower extremity or spine, (4) recent fracture in the lower extremity, (5) diagnosis of osteoporosis, (6) vestibular disorders, (7) peripheral vascular disease, and (11) other serious illnesses or contraindications to exercise.

This is a single-blinded randomized within-patient cross-over study. Each participant was evaluated for the soleus H-reflex, stiffness and blood perfusion of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) using ultrasound on both sides before and after either a 5-minute WBV intervention (30 Hertz, 1.5mm, knee flexed 60 degrees) or a no-WBV condition (5 minutes). The measurements were performed at baseline and every 1-min post-intervention up to 5 minutes. The outcomes generated included the soleus H/M ratio, shear modulus and vascular index (VI) of the MG muscle.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kowloon
      • Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult with a diagnosis of a hemispheric stroke >6 months,
  2. Medically stable,
  3. Able to stand independently for at least 1 minute and
  4. Mas score >1 measured at the ankle plantar flexors.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Brainstem or cerebellar stroke,
  2. Other neurological condition,
  3. Serious musculoskeletal or cardiovascular disease,
  4. Severe contracture of the ankle that the cannot be put in the neutral position.
  5. Metal implants or recent fractures in the lower extremities or spine,
  6. Fresh skin wound in lower extremities, especially popliteal fossa
  7. Other severe illnesses or contraindication for exercise.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control
This group will stand with knee flexion 60 degrees on the same vibration platform for 60 seconds for 5 times with 60-seconds rest interval, but no vibration will be given.
standing on the vibration platform, with no vibration signals delivered.
standing on the vibration platform, with no vibration signals delivered.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: High intensity whole body vibration
This group will stand with knee flexion 60 degrees on the same vibration platform for 60 seconds for 5 times with 60-seconds rest interval. The whole body vibration platform will be set with frequency at 30Hz and amplitude at 1.5mm.
standing on the vibration platform, with WBV at 30Hz, 1.5mm.
standing on the vibration platform, with WBV at 30Hz, 1.5mm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
H-reflex of paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
Immediately before the intervention
H-reflex of paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 1st minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
1st minute after the intervention
H-reflex of paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 2nd minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
2nd minute after the intervention
H-reflex of paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 3rd minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
3rd minute after the intervention
H-reflex of paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 4th minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
4th minute after the intervention
H-reflex of paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 5th minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
5th minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
Immediately before the intervention
Muscle stiffness of paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 1st minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
1st minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 2nd minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
2nd minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 3rd minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
3rd minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 4th minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
4th minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 5th minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
5th minute after the intervention
H-reflex of non-paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
Immediately before the intervention
H-reflex of non-paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 1st minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
1st minute after the intervention
H-reflex of non-paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 2nd minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
2nd minute after the intervention
H-reflex of non-paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 3rd minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
3rd minute after the intervention
H-reflex of non-paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 4th minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
4th minute after the intervention
H-reflex of non-paretic soleus muscle
Time Frame: 5th minute after the intervention
To measure the efficacy of synaptic transmission
5th minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
Immediately before the intervention
Muscle stiffness of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 1st minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
1st minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 2nd minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
2nd minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 3th minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
3th minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 4th minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
4th minute after the intervention
Muscle stiffness of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: 5th minute after the intervention
Measured by Supersonic elastography with ankle in neutral position
5th minute after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intramuscular blood perfusion of paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
Immediately before the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 1 minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
1 minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 2nd minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
2nd minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 3rd minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
3rd minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 4th minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
4th minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 5th minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
5th minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
Immediately before the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 1th minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
1th minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 2nd minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
2nd minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 3rd minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
3rd minute after the intervention
MoviIntramuscular blood perfusion of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 4th minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
4th minute after the intervention
Intramuscular blood perfusion of non-paretic medial gastrocnemius muscle
Time Frame: 5th minute after the intervention
Measured by power Doppler ultrasound
5th minute after the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke--lower extremities
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
Evaluates and measures motor recovery in post-stroke hemiplegic patients
Immediately before the intervention
Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Time Frame: Immediately before the intervention
Immediately before the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hector WH Tsang, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 3, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSEARS20161117007

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on paretic leg-control

Search Similar Trials