Biomarkers and Functional Imaging in Predicting Response of Esophageal Cancer

January 20, 2017 updated by: Mei Shi, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Combination of Molecular Biomarkers and Functional Imaging in Predicting Pathologic Response and Clinical Outcomes in Squamous Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Undergo Trimodality Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether combination of molecular and biomarkers with functional imaging can predict pathologic response and clinical outcomes in squamous esophageal cancer patients who undergo trimodality therapy which includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The recommended care for the management of locally advanced esophageal cancers is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy based on the NCCN guideline. The rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) after nCRT was around 25-30%, reflecting potential cure of unresectable esophageal cancer receiving CRT. Since esophagectomy might have substantial morbidity and mortality rate, establishing the model for predicting nCRT response and survival will guide neoadjuvant treatment decisions and personalized treatment. Thus surgery might be spared in some patients with complete responses after nCRT, and surgery could be selectively reserved for those with only partial or no response to CRT. However, reported models yield unsatisfactory results due to small sample size and low accuracy, and most cases were adenocarcinoma and few models were used to predict survival. This study will prospectively collect the tissue and blood samples of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients, detect CRT resistance biomarkers, assess the SUV value and texture parameters of 18F-FDG PET-CT as well as ADC values DWI-MRI. The investigators will use advanced statistical tools to establish the model and further validate the model in another group of patients.The investigators will also establish a model for survival prediction. This model might possibly guide the personalized treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients in China.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lina Zhao, Ph.D
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mei Shi, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient must have histologic documentation of squamous carcinoma of the esophagus at Xijing Hospital.
  2. Newly diagnosed Patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus who have undergone standard testing and been evaluated by the multidisciplinary team at Xijing Hospital and are considered appropriate candidates for and are willing to undergo chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery at Xijing Hospital.
  3. Patient must have undergone a baseline esophageal-gastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy and endoscopic ultrasonography at Xijing, with tissue available for biomarker analysis.
  4. Patient must be willing to undergo this research and must provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
  2. History of prior malignancy within the past 3 years.
  3. Patients with second primary tumors.
  4. Patients who received endoscopical therapy or induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation therapy are excluded.
  5. Patient is not a candidate for chemoradiation followed by surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Biomarkers and Imaging analysis
This study will prospectively collect the tissue and blood samples of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients, perform CRT resistance biomarkers testing and functional imaging analysis including SUV value and texture parameters of 18F-FDG PET-CT as well as ADC values DWI-MRI before treatment, 2-3 weeks after the initiation of CRT, and 4 weeks post-nCRT. The investigators will use advanced statistical tools to establish the model and further validate the model in another group of patients. The investigators will also establish a model for survival prediction.
Other: Biomarkers Testing
CRT resistance biomarkers will be detected before CRT, 2-3 weeks after the initiation of CRT, and 4 weeks post-CRT.
Other: Functional Imaging analysis
The SUV value and texture parameters of 18F-FDG PET-CT as well as ADC values DWI-MRI will be measures before CRT, 2-3 weeks after the initiation of CRT, and 4 weeks post-CRT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathologic Response
Time Frame: Approximately 12 months
Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) was used for pathology analysis. Primary tumor and positive lymph node regression were classified into five histologic tumor regression grades. Grade 1 (complete regression) showed absence of histologically identifiable residual cancer and fibrosis extending through the different layers of the esophageal wall, with or without granuloma. Grade 2 was characterized by the presence of rare residual cancer cells scattered through the fibrosis. Grade 3 involved an increase in the number of residual cancer cells, but fibrosis still predominated. Grade 4 showed residual cancer outgrowing fibrosis. Grade 5 was characterized by the absence of regressive changes.
Approximately 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Approximately 4 years
Approximately 4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Air Force Military Medical University, China

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Mei Shi, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • XJFL-2016-ESO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings