Epidural Decompression Surgery Within 24 Hours After Acute Spinal Cord Injury Improves Spinal Nerve Function

April 13, 2017 updated by: Baoguo Jiang, Peking University People's Hospital

Epidural Decompression Surgery Within 24 Hours After Acute Spinal Cord Injury Improves Spinal Nerve Function: a Prospective, Multicenter, Non-randomized, Controlled Trial

To compare the effects of early (within 24 hours) and delayed (exceed 24 hours) epidural decompression surgery on the recovery of spinal nerve function in patients with acute spinal cord injury (complete and incomplete) at postoperative 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Whether early epidural decompression surgery can restore neurological function in patients with acute spinal cord injury (complete and incomplete), and an effective time window for epidural decompression, are still controversial.

This trial will verify whether early epidural decompression surgery is more conducive to the recovery of spinal nerve function in patients with acute spinal cord injury (complete and incomplete) compared with delayed surgery. This trial will begin in August 2017. Data analysis of 200 patients will be finished in December 2019. All results will be completed in December 2020. This trial will provide clinical evidences for the selection of timing of epidural decompression surgery in patients with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury.

Adverse events Adverse events will be obtained from patients or their legal representatives. Major adverse events will include: limb paralysis deterioration, re-operation, respirator use (more than 1 week), tracheostomy, septicemia, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, atelectasis, other respiratory complications, wound infection (superficial and deep), urinary tract infection, other infections, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, intestinal obstruction, acute myocardial infarction, other heart events, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular complication, hepatic failure, renal failure, delirium and depression.

Statistical methods

  1. All data will be analyzed using SPSS 19.0 software.
  2. Normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as mean, SD, minimums, and maximums. Non-normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as the lower quartile (q1) and median and upper quartiles (q3). Count data will be presented as the percentage.
  3. Measurement data among groups will be compared using two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.
  4. Count data will be analyzed using chi square test or Fisher's exact test. Ranked data will be analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Sample size ASIA motor score is one of the main outcome measures. In accordance with a previous study (Chikuda et al., 2013), taking power = 0.8 with a significance level of α = 0.05, we will need 45 patients per group when the difference to be detected in the ASIA motor score between the groups is 12 points and the common standard deviation is 20. If we assume a patient loss rate of 20%, we will require 54 patients per group, totally 108 patients. We therefore aim to include 200 patients in accordance with previous conditions on acute spinal cord injury (complete and incomplete) treatment in participating units.

Data management

  1. All data will be input into the spinal cord injury treatment database. After the completion of the study, the research group and third-party statistical staffs will carry out data collation and analysis.
  2. The participating units are responsible for filling in the information database. Data consistency and logic will be checked by computer program combined with manual review. Any questions will be answered by the person in charge of the project and the main staff, and returned to the data management center, and then the data manager will modify and update the database.
  3. All inspection procedures need to be repeated several times until there is no doubt. All changes and updates are required for recording and filing. It is strictly forbidden to use correction fluid or correction tape. All researchers are required to ensure that the data recorded in the case report forms are authentic.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100020
        • Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100050
        • Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to the Capital University of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 85 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal cord injury patients will be evaluated as complete or incomplete (contusion) after admission using rectal examination, in accordance with American Spinal Injury Association and International Medical Society of Paraplegia (2000);
  • Final diagnosis by spine CT and/or MRI;
  • Cervical, thoracic and thoracolumbar fracture dislocation or without fracture dislocation but combined with spinal cord injury;
  • No other injury involving life, injury severity score < 16;
  • No anesthesia contraindication;
  • No local skin infection, no severe soft tissue contusion, soft tissue condition of the operation area met the operation requirements;
  • Age: 16-85 years old, irrespective of sex.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active or recent severe infection
  • Severe infectious diseases that need to be treated in infectious disease hospital;
  • History of mental illness;
  • History of metal allergy;
  • Long-term alcohol abuse and drug abuse;
  • Do not agree to participate in this trial; the legal representative of the patient refuses to sign informed consent;
  • Poor compliance, cannot be followed up as required.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: early epidural decompression group
The patients will be assigned to early (within 24 hours after spinal cord injury) epidural decompression group (n=100) according to the patient's condition and operation time.
Procedure: early epidural decompression group
The patients will be assigned to early (within 24 hours after spinal cord injury) epidural decompression group (n=100) according to the patient's condition and operation time.
Experimental: delayed epidural decompression group
The patients will be assigned to delayed (exceed 24 hours after spinal cord injury) epidural decompression group (n=100) according to the patient's condition and operation time.
Procedure: delayed epidural decompression group
The patients will be assigned to delayed (exceed 24 hours after spinal cord injury) epidural decompression group (n=100) according to the patient's condition and operation time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor and sensory scores
Time Frame: at postoperative 6 months
To assess spinal nerve function. Evaluation criteria for neurological function after spinal cord injury: Neurological function will be evaluated in accordance with American Spinal Injury Association and International Medical Society of Paraplegia (2000).
at postoperative 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale
Time Frame: changes of week 1, month 1 and month 3 after surgery
to assess spinal nerve function
changes of week 1, month 1 and month 3 after surgery
Evaluation of the incidence of complications
Time Frame: changes of week 1, month 1, month 3 and month 6 after surgery
to assess the incidence of complications.The percentage of the number of cases of postoperative complications to total cases will be calculated.
changes of week 1, month 1, month 3 and month 6 after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Baoguo Jiang, Ph.D, Department of Orthopedics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PekingUPH_003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on early epidural decompression group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings