Porous Tantalum Rods Improve the Hip Joint Function of Patients With Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head

August 19, 2016 updated by: Heling Zhang, Qinghai University

Porous Tantalum Rods Improve the Hip Joint Function of Patients With Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head After Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

To confirm 1) whether, compared with core decompression alone, core decompression with porous tantalum rod implantation improves the hip joint function of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery, 2) whether porous tantalum rod shows favorable biocompatibility with the human body, and 3) whether this treatment method is feasible for treating avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

History and current status of related studies: Femoral neck fracture can render the blood supply to the femoral head insufficient, leading to avascular necrosis of the femoral head. This often increases treatment difficulty and can have a strong influence on the recovery of hip joint function. Although core decompression for treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head has been largely used in clinical settings, the mid-term therapeutic effects are not satisfactory in some patients.

Biocompatibility is defined as the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response. The biocompatibility of a bone implant and host influences the therapeutic effects. Therefore, biomaterials that are less likely to induce negative host responses may increase the therapeutic effects of such treatments for orthopedic diseases. A porous tantalum rod is a bone trabecula-like metal implant that is used to support weight-bearing areas of necrotic bone, preventing further collapse of the necrotic area. This implant has exhibited favorable effects in the early treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Although previous reports have focused on porous tantalum rod implantation for clinical treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head after fermoral neck fracture, few have assessed the long-term therapeutic effects or biocompatibility of porous tantalum rods.

Adverse events Possible adverse events include any expected or unexpected symptoms. If severe adverse events occur, information including the date of occurrence and measures taken related to the treatment of the adverse events will be reported to the principal investigator and the institutional review board within 24 hours.

Data collection, management, analysis, and open access Data collection: Case report forms with demographic data, disease diagnosis, accompanying diseases, drug allergy history, and adverse events will be collected , processed using Epidata software, collated, and then electrically recorded using a double-data entry strategy by data managers.

Data management: The locked electronic database will not be altered in any way, and will only be available to the project manager. Paper and electronic data regarding screening, informed consent, and clinical outcomes will be preserved at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, China.

Data analysis: The electronic database will be made available to a professional statistician for statistical analysis. An outcome analysis report will be made by the statistician and submitted to the lead researchers. An independent data monitoring committee will supervise and manage the trial data with the goal of ensuring a scientific and stringent trial process, resulting in accurate and complete data.

Data open access: Anonymized trial data will be published at http://www.figshare.com.

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be performed by a statistician using SPSS 19.0 software and will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as a mean, standard deviation, min, and max. Non-normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as a lower quartile (q1), median, and upper quartile (q3). McNemar's test will be used to compare the percentage of patients with excellent hip joint function as per Harris hip scores 12 months after surgery, the percentage of patients presenting with femoral head collapse, prosthesis loosening, peri-prosthesis infection, and incidence of complications 6 and 12 months after surgery. The Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the VAS score prior to and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Statistical significance will be accepted when α = 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Qinghai
      • Xining, Qinghai, China, 810001
        • Recruiting
        • Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with fracture nonunion as indicated by a clear fracture line 12 months after femoral neck fracture; avascular necrosis of the femoral head as shown by cystic degeneration, sclerosis, and uneven density on X-ray images and CT scans
  • Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery who underwent internal fixation between 1 January 2016 and 31 May 2017
  • Age 18-80 years
  • Any sex and nationality
  • Provision of signed informed consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor general health
  • Chronic disease or history of surgery
  • Alcohol abuse or long-term use of hormone drugs
  • Unable or declines to cooperate with treatment and examination because of language and/or mental disorders
  • Unable or declines to cooperate with rehabilitation treatment because of mental and/or psychological disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery will undergo core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation (experimental group).
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral head fracture surgery receive treatment of core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation
Other Names:
  • Experimental group
Experimental: Control group
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery will undergo core decompression (control group).
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral head fracture surgery will undergo core decompression.
Other Names:
  • Control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Harris hip scores
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
To evaluate the recovery of hip joint function. The Harris hip score ranges from 0-100 points with higher scores indicating better hip joint function. Hip joint function is scored as follows: ≥ 90 is excellent, 80-89 very good, 70-79 good, and < 70 poor.
12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: prior to and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery
To evaluate the severity of pain and ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.
prior to and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Incidences of complications
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
To evaluate the safety of various implantation methods.
6 and 12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heling Zhang, Master, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Femoral Neck Fracture

Clinical Trials on porous tantalum rod

3
Subscribe