Reducing HIV Vulnerability Through A Multilevel Life Skills Intervention For Adolescent Men

May 3, 2023 updated by: University of Pennsylvania
The investigators propose to deliver and test a life skills intervention targeting the key domains that fuel HIV disparities among adolescent (ages 13-18) same-sex attracted men in the United States. This RCT will yield important information regarding the delivery of a developmentally-appropriate HIV prevention program that reaches racial/ethnic and socioeconomically diverse sample of adolescent men across four regions in the United States.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

From 2000-2010, the annual number of new HIV diagnoses among MSM aged 13-24 years old more than doubled. There are stark racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of new HIV infections among YMSM; 13- 24 year old racial and ethnic minority MSM now represent a rapidly growing share of all new HIV infections. Although the likelihood of HIV acquisition is greater at older ages, many of the cognitive and behavioral risk factors that contribute to the risk of HIV infection rates develop in adolescence. As adolescent MSM (AMSM; 13-18 years old) begin to develop and express gender and sexual identities, to experiment and begin sexual behaviors, and to begin to establish a sense of self, there is the opportunity to parallel this period of growth with targeted, tailored interventions that equip AMSM with the life skills they need to reduce their vulnerability to HIV risk and to establish the life skills necessary to manage risk. The investigators developed a mobile-friendly WebApp intervention focused on life skills training with links to local resources. In the proposed activities, the investigators will adapt the life skills intervention for four U.S regions heavily impacted by HIV, and revise the content to include materials that are age-appropriate for 13 to 18 year-olds. Given the role that stigma and social isolation plays in the lives of many AMSM, the investigators also propose to embed a peer-to-peer motivational interviewing component, allowing participants to access motivational interviewing counseling via VSee video-chat. With a large and diverse sample (n=500), the investigators will test the efficacy of the intervention, now referred to as iCON+, on cognitive and behavioral HIV-related outcomes using a two-arm randomized control design. In addition, the investigators examine whether structural characteristics in a region (e.g., race/ethnicity segregation, HIV prevalence) influence the efficacy of the proposed intervention.

The following Specific Aims are proposed:

  1. Adapt a multilevel, online life skills intervention to address HIV vulnerability among AMSM living in four heavily impacted regions constituting diverse racial/ethnic and geographic areas (Chicago-Detroit; Atlanta-Washington, DC; Memphis- New Orleans; San Francisco-San Diego) in the US.
  2. Test the efficacy of our intervention, as compared to a delayed intervention condition, to improve cognitive (e.g., comfort discussing sexuality; HIV prevention attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, behavioral intentions) and behavioral (e.g., condom use, HIV testing, PrEP use) factors using a prospective RCT design.
  3. Examine the differential efficacy of our intervention in improving psychosocial mediators (e.g., personal competency) associated with our outcomes; and,
  4. Examine how socio-ecological determinants at the individual (e.g., race/ethnicity, urbanity) and regional (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage, HIV prevalence) level are associated with intervention efficacy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Assigned a male sex at birth and identifying as male at time of enrollment,
  2. Be between the ages of 13-18 (inclusive),
  3. Speak and read English,
  4. Report same-sex attractions and/or behaviors,
  5. Live in one of the zip codes of the 109 counties included in this trial,
  6. Access to internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Being assigned a sex other than male at birth,
  2. Identifying as a gender other than male at time of enrollment,
  3. Being younger than 13 or older than 18 years of age,
  4. Not speaking and reading English,
  5. Reporting no same-sex attractions and/or behaviors,
  6. Living outside of the 109 counties included in the four regions selected for this trial,
  7. Currently incarcerated,
  8. No access to internet.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Life Skills Coaching
Participants in the experimental arm will receive access to HIV prevention and life skills content, including opportunities for goal setting, a directory of local resources in their community, and the ability to discuss their goals with Youth Navigators through a video-chat function.
Behavioral: Life Skills Coaching
The investigators designed the intervention to help participants increase their HIV risk awareness, promote self-appraisal and increase motivation for engaging in prevention services, problem solving barriers to accessing care, and locating culturally-sensitive providers. Intervention content is customized based on participants' socio-demographic characteristics and geographic location.
Active Comparator: Community Resources
Participants in the control arm will receive access to a directory of local resources in their community.
Behavioral: Community Resources
The investigators will provide a resource locator as the attention-control condition. The resource locator provides a list of health (e.g., HIV testing) and social (e.g., support groups) resources across study regions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confidence to Engage in HIV Prevention Behaviors When Engaging in Receptive Anal Sex Over Time
Time Frame: 6-month, 12-month
The investigators will measure HIV prevention self-efficacy over time, using a 4-point scale (1=Very Easily; 2=Easily; 3=Somewhat Easily; 4=Not Easily) where lower scores indicate a better outcome.
6-month, 12-month
HIV Knowledge Over Time
Time Frame: 6-month, 12-month
The investigators will measure HIV prevention knowledge over time using 13 True or False statements (0=Incorrect; 1=Correct) regarding HIV transmission. Scores can range from 0 to 13, where higher scores indicate a better outcome.
6-month, 12-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Engaging in 1+ Same-Sex Sexual Partnerships
Time Frame: 6-month, 12-month
The investigators will estimate participants' likelihood of engaging in one or more same-sex sexual partnerships during follow-up periods.
6-month, 12-month
Number of Participants Engaging in HIV Testing Behavior
Time Frame: 12-month
The investigators will estimate the number of participants who tested for HIV two or more times over the trial period.
12-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pennsylvania

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
San Diego State University
University of Michigan
Emory University
George Washington University
University of North Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 23, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • U01MD011274 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Life Skills Coaching

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings