RESETTLE-IDPs: Life-Skills Education and Psychosocial Resilience Building for Displaced Nigerians (RESETTLE-IDPs)

May 14, 2024 updated by: Ejemai Eboreime, Dalhousie University

Rebuilding Emotional Stability and Strength Through Therapeutic and Life-Skills Education for Internally Displaced Persons in Nigeria (RESETTLE-IDPs): A Hybrid Type II Effectiveness-implementation Study

The RESETTLE-IDPs study aims to address the urgent mental health needs of internally displaced youth and women in Nigeria, who face high rates of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress due to exposure to conflict, violence, and loss. Despite the immense needs, there is a severe lack of culturally appropriate, evidence-based interventions to support the resilience and well-being of these vulnerable populations.

To fill this gap, the study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a novel life skills education (LSE) program delivered through two innovative approaches: in-person peer support groups and WhatsApp-based virtual support groups. The LSE curriculum, developed through extensive community engagement, covers topics such as stress management, communication, problem-solving, health, safety, and advocacy, all tailored to the unique challenges of displacement.

In the in-person arm, trained IDP peers and local providers will facilitate weekly group sessions over 12 weeks, providing a safe space for participants to learn, practice, and apply new skills while building social connections and support networks. In the WhatsApp arm, participants will receive weekly messages with educational content, reflection prompts, and exercises, moderated by trained facilitators to foster dialogue and peer support.

By comparing these two delivery methods, the study aims to identify the most feasible, acceptable, and effective strategies for rolling out psychosocial support interventions in humanitarian settings, particularly those with limited resources and access. The study will also assess the interventions' impact on key mental health outcomes, including depression, anxiety, PTSD, and well-being, as well as life skills, functioning, and implementation metrics such as reach, adoption, and sustainability.

Ultimately, the RESETTLE-IDPs study seeks to generate actionable evidence to inform the development and scale-up of culturally responsive, community-driven interventions that can promote the mental health and resilience of conflict-affected populations in Nigeria and beyond. By empowering IDP youth and women with the knowledge, skills, and support to navigate the challenges of displacement, the study aims to contribute to a brighter, more hopeful future for these resilient communities

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The RESETTLE-IDPs study is a cluster-randomized type II effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a life skills education (LSE) intervention delivered through two innovative approaches - in-person peer support groups and WhatsApp-based virtual support groups - to improve the mental health and well-being of internally displaced persons in Nigeria.

Background and Rationale:

Nigeria is facing a severe humanitarian crisis, with over 2.7 million people internally displaced due to armed conflict, communal violence, and natural disasters. Internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Nigeria, particularly youth and women, are at high risk of mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to exposure to trauma, loss, and ongoing stressors. Despite the immense needs, there is a severe lack of culturally appropriate, evidence-based interventions to support the mental health and resilience of IDP populations in Nigeria and other low-resource humanitarian settings.

Life skills education (LSE) is a promising approach to promoting mental health and well-being among conflict-affected populations. LSE programs aim to equip individuals with the knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to navigate challenges, cope with stress, and make healthy decisions. Previous studies have shown that LSE interventions can improve mental health outcomes, social-emotional learning, and positive youth development in various contexts. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness and implementation of LSE programs specifically tailored for IDP youth and women in Nigeria, and how different delivery methods (e.g., in-person vs. mobile-based) may impact their reach, acceptability, and sustainability.

Study Objectives:

The primary objective of the RESETTLE-IDPs study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a 12-week LSE intervention, delivered through either in-person peer support groups or WhatsApp-based virtual support groups, on mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, PTSD, and well-being) among IDP youth and women in Nigeria, compared to a wait-list control group.

Secondary objectives include:

  1. To assess the impact of the LSE intervention on life skills acquisition, daily functioning, and social support among IDP youth and women.
  2. To compare the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and cost-effectiveness of in-person vs. WhatsApp-based delivery methods for the LSE intervention.
  3. To explore the contextual factors, implementation processes, and mechanisms of change that influence the effectiveness and sustainability of the LSE intervention in IDP settings.
  4. To engage stakeholders (IDP communities, health workers, humanitarian organizations, policymakers) in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the LSE intervention to promote its cultural relevance, ownership, and scalability.

Methods: The study will use a three-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial design, with IDP camps in Nigeria randomly allocated to one of two groups: (1) in-person LSE peer support groups, (2) WhatsApp-based LSE virtual support groups. The target population includes IDPs youth aged 13 years and above residing in selected camps in Borno State, the epicenter of the Boko Haram insurgency and displacement crisis in Nigeria.

The intervention will consist of a culturally adapted LSE curriculum covering topics such as stress management, communication skills, problem-solving, health and hygiene, safety and protection, gender norms, and community mobilization. The curriculum will be developed through a participatory process involving IDP youth and women, community leaders, health workers, and education specialists, drawing on existing evidence-based resources and guidelines (e.g. UNICEF LSE Toolkit).

In the in-person arm, trained IDP peers and local providers will facilitate weekly gender- and age-segregated support groups of 10-12 participants over a 12-week period. The groups will provide a safe space for participants to learn and practice life skills, share experiences, and provide mutual support. Sessions will use interactive, experiential learning methods such as role-plays, discussions, and group projects.

In the WhatsApp arm, participants will be enrolled in moderated virtual support groups that deliver the LSE curriculum through weekly conversations, including psychoeducational content, reflection prompts, skill-building exercises, and peer discussion topics. Trained IDP facilitators will moderate the groups to ensure safe and supportive interactions, provide feedback, and encourage skill application.

The study will enroll a total of 500 participants (250 per arm) across 20 IDP camps, with an estimated 25 participants per camp. Participants will be recruited through community-based mobilization strategies, with support from camp leaders, health workers, and NGO partners.

Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data will include validated mental health scales, as well as locally adapted measures of life skills, functioning, and social support. Qualitative data will include in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with participants, facilitators, and stakeholders to explore experiences, perceptions, and contextual factors influencing the intervention.

Data analysis will use an intent-to-treat approach, with mixed-effects regression models to assess intervention effects on primary and secondary outcomes, accounting for clustering at the camp level. Qualitative data will be analyzed thematically to identify barriers, facilitators, and mechanisms of change. Implementation outcomes (e.g., reach, fidelity, acceptability) will be assessed using process evaluation frameworks (e.g., RE-AIM).

Expected Results and Impact:

The RESETTLE-IDPs study aims to generate rigorous evidence on the effectiveness and implementation of a culturally adapted LSE intervention for improving the mental health and well-being of IDP youth and women in Nigeria. The study findings will have important implications for the design, delivery, and scale-up of psychosocial support interventions in humanitarian settings, particularly those affected by conflict and displacement.

By comparing in-person and WhatsApp-based delivery methods, the study will provide valuable insights into the relative advantages, challenges, and effectiveness of different approaches to reaching and engaging IDP populations. The use of implementation science frameworks and participatory research methods will ensure that the intervention is not only effective but also feasible, acceptable, and sustainable in real-world contexts.

The study will also contribute to capacity-building and empowerment of IDP communities by training and engaging youth and women as peer facilitators, researchers, and advocates. The participatory approach aims to foster local ownership, leadership, and sustainability of the intervention beyond the research period.

Ultimately, the RESETTLE-IDPs study has the potential to inform policy, practice, and funding priorities for mental health and psychosocial support in humanitarian settings, both in Nigeria and globally. By advancing the evidence base on culturally relevant, community-based interventions, the study can contribute to reducing the global burden of mental health disorders and promoting the resilience and well-being of conflict-affected populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 13 years and above
  • Ownership of smartphone
  • Internally displaced for at least 6 months.
  • Residing in select IDP camps in Abuja and Borno State, Nigeria
  • Fluency in English and/or Hausa languages
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active suicidal ideation or attempts (i.e having thoughts, plans, or intent to end one's life within the past month)
  • Active psychosis
  • Cognitive impairment precluding informed consent or survey completion.
  • Not owning as smartphone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: In-Person Life Skills Education (LSE) Peer Support Groups
Participants will receive a culturally-adapted LSE intervention delivered through weekly in-person peer support group sessions for 12 weeks. The LSE curriculum covers topics such as stress management, communication skills, problem-solving, emotion regulation, health and hygiene, social skills, gender norms and safety, education and livelihoods, and community mobilization. Each peer support group will consist of 10-12 participants, separated by gender and age bands (12-17 and 18-24 for youth, 18+ for women), and will meet weekly for approximately 2 hours in a private, safe space within the IDP camp. Sessions will be co-facilitated by a trained IDP peer leader and a local mental health provider, following a structured format with interactive activities, discussions, and skill practice.
Behavioral: Life Skills Education
The RESETTLE-IDPs study compares two innovative delivery approaches for a culturally-adapted life skills education (LSE) intervention aimed at improving the mental health and well-being of internally displaced persons in Nigeria. The interventions are distinguished by their mode of delivery (in-person vs. WhatsApp-based), their focus on peer support and skill-building, and their tailoring to the specific needs and challenges of IDP populations.
Active Comparator: WhatsApp-Enabled LSE Virtual Peer Support Groups
Participants will receive the same culturally-adapted LSE curriculum as those in the In-person arm, but delivered through WhatsApp for 12 weeks. Participants will be added to a moderated WhatsApp group chat with other IDP youth or women in their camp, where they will receive three LSE-related messages per week. These messages will include brief psychoeducational content, practice exercises, reflection prompts, and reminders to engage with the virtual support group. The WhatsApp group will provide a platform for participants to discuss the LSE topics, share experiences and coping strategies, and provide emotional support to one another, with trained IDP peer facilitators moderating the chats to ensure a safe and supportive environment. Participants will also receive regular push notifications with motivational messages, links to further resources, and reminders to practice the LSE skills.
Behavioral: Life Skills Education
The RESETTLE-IDPs study compares two innovative delivery approaches for a culturally-adapted life skills education (LSE) intervention aimed at improving the mental health and well-being of internally displaced persons in Nigeria. The interventions are distinguished by their mode of delivery (in-person vs. WhatsApp-based), their focus on peer support and skill-building, and their tailoring to the specific needs and challenges of IDP populations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Metric/Method of Measurement: PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of PTSD symptoms based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Participants rate how much they have been bothered by each symptom in the past month on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater severity of PTSD symptoms. A score of 31-33 or higher suggests probable PTSD diagnosis.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Metric/Method of Measurement: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) The PHQ-9 is a 9-item self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of depressive symptoms based on the DSM-5 criteria. Participants rate how often they have been bothered by each symptom over the past 2 weeks on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. Cut-off scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Change in anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Metric/Method of Measurement: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of anxiety symptoms. Participants rate how often they have been bothered by each symptom over the past 2 weeks on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Cut-off scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Change in well-being
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Metric/Method of Measurement: World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) The WHO-5 is a 5-item self-report measure that assesses subjective psychological well-being over the past 2 weeks. Participants rate each item on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time). The total score ranges from 0 to 25, which is then multiplied by 4 to yield a percentage score ranging from 0 to 100. A score below 50 suggests poor well-being and a score below 28 indicates likely depression.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Change in perceived appropriateness of the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Metric/Method of Measurement: Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) The IAM is a 4-item self-report measure that assesses the perceived appropriateness of an intervention. Participants rate each item on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The total score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness.
Baseline, 3 months
Change in acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Metric/Method of Measurement: Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) The AIM is a 4-item self-report measure that assesses the perceived acceptability of an intervention. Participants rate each item on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The total score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Baseline, 3 months
Change in life skills
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Metric/Method of Measurement: A Life Skills Assessment Tool (LSAT) The LSAT is a locally developed measure that assesses participants' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to the key life skills covered in the LSE curriculum (e.g., stress management, communication, problem-solving, health and hygiene). The scale includes a mix of multiple-choice and Likert-type items, with higher scores indicating greater life skills competency. The exact number of items and scoring system will be determined through formative research and pilot testing with the target population.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Dalhousie University

Collaborators

University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital
Brooks Insights

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ejemai A Eboreime, MBBS, PhD, Dalhousie University
  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Agyapong, MD, PhD, Dalhousie University
  • Principal Investigator: Rita Orji, PhD, Dalhousie University
  • Principal Investigator: Sanni Yaya, PhD, University of Ottawa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-7085
  • PAA - 192178 (Other Grant/Funding Number: CIHR)
  • R-HGC-POC-2408-67370 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Grand Challenges Canada)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will share de-identified IPD underlying the published results of the RESETTLE-IDPs study, including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code.

IPD will be made available upon reasonable request and after approval by the study's steering committee, subject to a data sharing agreement

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data Sharing Statement We will share de-identified IPD underlying the published results of the RESETTLE-IDPs study, including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code.

IPD will be made available upon reasonable request and after approval by the study's steering committee, subject to a data sharing agreement.

Access Criteria and Procedure Researchers interested in accessing the IPD should submit a formal request to the study's principal investigator, specifying the purpose, scope, and timeline of the proposed analyses.

Requests will be reviewed by the steering committee based on the scientific merit, feasibility, and alignment with the study's objectives and participants' informed consent.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health

Clinical Trials on Life Skills Education

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Equatorial Guinea

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe