Study in Leptomeningeal Metastases of Breast Cancer (LCS Bio Sein)

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Value: Exploratory and Prospective Study in Leptomeningeal Metastases of Breast Cancer (LCS Bio Sein)

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cause of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) .As for brain parenchymal metastases, the incidence of LM seems to be increasing, due to the growing incidence of metastatic BC, the improvement of survival and the poor diffusion of therapeutic agents into the central nervous system (CNS). Several prognostic factors have been identified, including the age at diagnosis, the functional and neurological status, the delay between the diagnosis of cancer and that of LM. The survival of patients is poor, less than 6 months in most published series. Several neuronal biomarkers could also be good candidates, such as the neurogranin CSF and/or serum levels or the CNS neurofilaments (NF), that seem to be a good reflect of axonal injury and neuronal loss. CNS NF have been investigated in several neurological diseases including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis, but not yet in CNS metastases. Indeed, the creation of a clinico-biological collection seems to be of high value in order to investigate future biomarkers of interest

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cause of leptomeningeal metastases (LM). As for brain parenchymal metastases, the incidence of LM seems to be increasing, due to the growing incidence of metastatic BC, the improvement of survival and the poor diffusion of therapeutic agents into the central nervous system (CNS). Several prognostic factors have been identified, including the age at diagnosis, the functional and neurological status, the delay between the diagnosis of cancer and that of LM. Other CSF biomarkers have been evaluated for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases. Finally, the CellSearch® technique allows for the characterisation of proteins expressed by CSF tumors cells (E.G., HER2) and will make possible a better understanding of the physiopathology of tumor dissemination to the CS.

Other neuronal biomarkers could be interesting for the diagnosis of LM in BC patients. Among them, the protein Tau (total-Tau or T-Tau) is involved in several neurological diseases. However, to date, no study has evaluated CSF or serum T-Tau in LM from solid tumors.

Several neuronal biomarkers could also be good candidates, such as the neurogranin CSF and/or serum levels or the CNS neurofilaments (NF), that seem to be a good reflect of axonal injury and neuronal loss.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34298
        • Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patient ≥ 18 years-old, no age limit;
  2. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of BC;
  3. Hormone receptors and HER2 statuses of the primary tumor available;
  4. Suspected LM based on clinical symptoms or signs, or radiological abnormalities;
  5. Indication of diagnosis lumbar puncture decided by the oncologist in charge of the patient;
  6. Patients must be affiliated to a Social Security System;
  7. Patient information and written informed consent form signed prior to any study specific procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of other cancer(s) than the BC (except completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated in situ carcinoma).
  2. Hormone receptors and/or HER2 statuses of the primary tumor not available;
  3. Patients with a medical contra-indication to the realization of a lumbar puncture;
  4. Patients with psychological, family, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule;
  5. Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  6. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Biological samples
The CSF samples will be taken at the occasion of the first lumbar puncture performed for clinical purposes (suspected LM). If necessary for the routine diagnosis, a second and a third lumbar puncture will be performed according to the gold standard Two EDTA tubes (5 mL) and two dried tubes (5mL) will be will be taken the same day as the first lumbar puncture and transferred at ambient temperature to the Biological Resource Center of the ICM (Jean-Pierre Bleuse, Biobank number BB-0033-00059) to be processed within 1 hour Blood samples will be centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 minutes at ambient temperature and will be aliquoted in 4 plasma and 4 serum aliquots and then stored at -80°C. Aliquots must be anonymized.
Two EDTA tubes (5 mL) and two dried tubes (5mL) will be will be taken the same day as the first lumbar .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the CellSearch® technique on CSF samples in comparison with the conventional cytology on one to three CSF sample
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
analysis of result with the 2 technical procedure
through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: marc ychou, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ICM-URC 2015/71

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on blood samples

Search Similar Trials