Comparison of the Vividtrac™ and Other Videolaryngoscopes in Clinical Practice

August 31, 2017 updated by: Gábor László Woth, University of Pecs

Comparison of Necessary Time for Successful Intubation With the Vividtrac™ and KingVision™ Videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh Blade Direct Laryngoscopy in Clinical Practice

Comparison of various videolaryngoscope devices (Vividtrac™ and KingVision™) and direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade regarding laryngoscopy time, intubation time, intubation success rate, percentage of visible glottic opening (POGO score) in elective and acute clinical anaesthesiology practice.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Baranya county
      • Pécs, Baranya county, Hungary, 7622
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pécs, Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dóra Keresztes, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gábor Woth, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bálint Nagy, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written informed consent
  • over 18 years of age
  • elective intervention
  • no anticipated difficult airway or intubation
  • preoperative anaesthesia risk assessment by American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification: ASA grade I-II

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Macintosh laryngoscopy
In this group intubation attempt is carried out with a standard Macintosh (size 3 or 4) direct laryngoscopy blade.
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a size 4 (or size 3 if necessary) Macintosh blade direct laryngoscope.
Active Comparator: KingVision videolaryngoscope
In this group intubation attempt is carried out with KingVision videolaryngoscope with a channeled, disposable single-use blade.
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a KingVision videolaryngoscope.
Active Comparator: VividTrac videolaryngoscope
In this group intubation attempt is carried out with VividTrac Adult model using a smartphone or laptop running the VividVision proprietary software.
During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a Vividtrac videolaryngoscope connected to a tablet or smartphone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intubation time
Time Frame: Measured once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
Time necessary to secure airway during the induction of general anesthesia. Intubation time is measured from the point the airway device crosses the interdental line until the completion of intubation with insufflated cuffed endotracheal tube (secured airway).
Measured once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Laryngoscopy time
Time Frame: Registered once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
Time necessary to achieve best visualisation of the glottic opening.
Registered once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score
Time Frame: Registered once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
The POGO score describes the best view of the glottic opening compared to the anatomical picture of the glottis. During direct laryngoscopy the investigator registers an approximate socre, while video laryngoscopy records are assessed by an independent investigator.
Registered once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
Tube insertion time
Time Frame: Registered once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
Time necessary for the operator to insert the cuffed endotracheal tube inside the proximal part of the trachea through the glottic opening. Tube insertion time is measured after the investigator finished the search for the glottic opening, achieved best view and decided to insert the tube into the trachea until the cuff is inflated and the airway is secured.
Registered once during the intubation attempt. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
Primary intubation attempt success rate
Time Frame: Measured once after intubation. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.
All intubation attempts must be finished within 120 seconds or the investigator should give up the attempt and reoxygenize the patient before another attempt. If the investigator finished within the 120 seconds time frame we assess endotracheal tube position by capnography and auscultation. The attempt is regarded successful if the tube is in the right position and the airway is secured.
Measured once after intubation. Up to 120 seconds following the start of intubation attempt.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bálint Nagy, MD PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pecs, Hungary
  • Study Chair: Szilárd Rendeki, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pecs, Hungary
  • Study Chair: Lajos Bogár, MD PhD DSc, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pecs, Hungary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6328

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation;Difficult

Clinical Trials on Direct laryngoscopy

Search Similar Trials