Microwave Ablation Combined With TACE in the Treatment of Unresectable Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma Huge

May 6, 2019 updated by: Fan Weijun

Effectivity and Safety of Microwave Ablation Combined With Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization(TACE) for Huge Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Multicenter Analysis

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with MWA in patients with huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Despite the widespread application of surveillance programs in high-risk populations, patients continue to present with huge (≥ 10 cm) HCCs.And it's still a challenge to treat huge HCC nowadays.Surgical resection is currently the only curative treatment for huge HCCs ; however, only a minority of patients are candidates for curative resection. Sorafenib is recommended for the treatment of advanced HCCs, including huge HCCs, but the usage is severely limited by high adverse event rates and low efficiency. Thus, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the first choice for huge unresectable HCCs. Several studies have concluded that TACE effectively improves the overall survival of patients with huge HCCs. Meanwhile, microwave ablation (MWA) now has been shown to be safe and effective for local tumor control in HCC patients. However, neither MWA nor TACE alone can achieve complete control of large HCCs . Therefore, the combination of TACE and MWA (TACE+MWA) is an appealing approach to treat HCCs. TACE+MWA now has been shown to improve overall survival rates compared with TACE alone in patients with small to large HCCs. But little data is available on TACE+MWA in patients with huge unresectable HCCs. Thus, the study was designed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100021
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Cancer Institute &Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
          • Xiao Li, M.D
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350005
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Zhenyu Lin, M.D.
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350014
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The tumor hospital of Fujian Province
        • Contact:
          • Hailan Lin, M.D
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Not yet recruiting
        • the First Affiliated Hospital of SunYat-senUniversity
        • Contact:
          • Jiaping Li, M.D
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518020
        • Recruiting
        • ShenZhen People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Yanfang Zhang, M.D.
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518036
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Hospital of Shenzhen
        • Contact:
          • Junhui Chen, M.D.
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250000
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University
        • Contact:
          • Yuliang Li, M.D
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250014
        • Recruiting
        • Shandong Province Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Xin Ye, M.D
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 26555
        • Recruiting
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University
        • Contact:
          • Zixiang Li, M.D
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) must be 0-1
  2. The diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma must be in line with the American Society for the study of liver diseases (AASLD) diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  3. Child-Pugh score A or B;
  4. Aged from 18 to 75 years;
  5. Subjects voluntarily join the study, and signe informed consent;
  6. No anti-tumor therapy was received；
  7. Meet the following 4 characteristics: A. primary tumor diameter more than or equal to 10cm; B. no more than 3 HCC foci, and the maximum diameter is less than or equal to 5cm; C. with IIa, I or no portal vein tumor thrombus (Cheng's Classification)；D. the tumor could not be surgically removed
  8. No extrahepatic metastases

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Abnormal coagulation function: PLT < 40×109/L, PTA < 40%;
  2. Patients have the past history of liver cancer treatment, such as transplantation, resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and so on;
  3. Patients participated in clinical trials of equipment or drugs (signed informed consent) within 4 weeks;
  4. Patients accompany by ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and esophageal and gastric varices bleeding;
  5. Any serious accompanying disease, which is expected to have an unknown, impact on the prognosis, include heart disease, inadequately controlled diabetes and psychiatric disorders;
  6. Patients accompanied with other tumors or past medical history of malignancy;
  7. Pregnant or lactating patients, all patients participating in this trial must adopt appropriate birth control measures during treatment;
  8. Allergic to adriamycin chemotherapy drugs，contrast agent and lipiodol;
  9. Patients have poor compliance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: TACE+MWA
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation: 2-3 times of TACE treatment, then followed by ablation treatment using MWA system.
Procedure: TACE
TACE: With the patient under local anesthesia, a 5F French catheter was introduced into the abdominal aorta via the femoral artery using the Seldinger technique. Hepatic arterial angiography was performed using fluoroscopy to guide the catheter into the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Then, the feeding arteries, tumor, and vascular anatomy surrounding the tumor were identified. Subsequently, a microcatheter was super-selectively inserted into the feeding arteries. Then, a mixture solution containing chemotherapeutic agents and embolic agents were infused into the artery according to the size and blood supply of the tumors.
Other Names:
  • Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization procedure
Procedure: MWA
MWA: All patients were instructed to fast from all foods for 12 hours preoperatively. During the procedure, a CT scan was used to locate the liver tumors, and to design the optimal puncture needle route. Routine disinfection and local anesthesia was applied around the puncture point, and a 16-gauge microwave antenna was gradually inserted into the tumor along the pre-determined angle. Settings of the MWA parameters depended on the manufacturer's recommendation and our experience.
Other Names:
  • Microwave ablation
Device: MWA system
MWA system is a kind of medical treatment instrument to restrain and kill tumor based on microwave heating technique and biology heating effect theory.
Other Names:
  • Microwave ablation system
Drug: Chemoembolization
Chemotherapeutic drugs: adriamycin，epirubicin and pirarubicin. Embolic agent: lipiodol and embolic microspherea The mixture solution containing chemotherapeutic drugs and embolic agent were infused into the artery according to by the number and size of the lesions, liver and kidney function of the patient, and blood supply of the tumors.
Other Names:
  • Chemotherapeutic drugs and Embolic agent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Overall survival (OS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the enrollment to death from any cause. For surviving patients, follow-up will be censored at the date of last contact (or last date known to be alive). Follow-up for OS will occur every 12 weeks (±1 month) until death or withdrawal of consent from the study.
up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Progression-free survival (PFS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the first date of study treatment until documented disease progression (as per mRECIST) or death from any cause, whichever is earlier. For patients who remain alive without progression, follow-up time will be censored at the date of last disease assessment.
up to 3 years
Adverse event rate
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Adverse event rate will be defined as the rate of patients who developed adverse event.
up to 3 years
Distant metastasis-free survival
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Progression-free survival (PFS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the first date of study treatment until documented distant metastasis (as per RECIST 1.1) or death from any cause, whichever is earlier. For patients who remain alive without progression, follow-up time will be censored at the date of last disease assessment .
up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fan Weijun

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Weijun Fan, M.D, Sun Yat-sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • sysucc01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-resectable

Clinical Trials on TACE

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings