Dyslexics' Visual Attention Field

February 28, 2024 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Evaluation of the Visuo-attention Field of Symbols Versus Objects Visual Search in Dyslexic Subjects. DyslexiaSPOTLIGHT

dyslexia is often considered like a phonological deficit but some researches show that a visual attention (V-A) deficit can occur in dyslexia. The investigator want to show that some dyslexics have a reduced V-A field in visual search when the investigator use separable feature (letter-like).

If the investigator demonstrate that, he will show that V-A deficit can be transpose to an ability acquired before reading, the visual search. Therefore, the V-A deficit can't be a consequence of reading problem but a cause of it for some dyslexics.

The investigator could imagine an earlier diagnosis for children at risk to develop dyslexia and make reeducation more specific for the deficit observed.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1460

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69500
        • U1028 INSERM - CNRS UMR 5292 Equipe ImpAct

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • normal or corrected to normal vision
  • diagnosed dyslexics with a recent "alouette" test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other developmental problem (dysphasia, dyspraxia, ADHD)
  • strabismus, amblyopia, oculomotor paralysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: controls

Visual attention span : the subject see a 5 letters strings during 200 ms and he has to report it verbally whatever the order Visual search : the subject has to find a target among distractors (24 or 48) in different conditions of stimuli (conjunction feature or separable feature) and different conditions of view (full view or reduced view with the moving window paradigm) Elementary visuo spatial perception: the subject passes 6 visuo spatial test to judge his visuo spatial abilities.

"test de l'alouette" : reading test during 3 minutes, we note the number of word read and the errors. We obtain lexical age.

All of these tests will be made during an unique visit of 1h30.

Experimental: Dyslexics with reduced visual attention span
21 subjects diagnosed dyslexics with reduced visual attention span

Visual attention span : the subject see a 5 letters strings during 200 ms and he has to report it orally whatever the order Visual search : the subject has to find a target among distractors (24 or 48) in different conditions of stimuli (conjunction feature or separable feature) and different conditions of view (full view or reduced view with the moving window paradigm) Elementary visuo spatial perception: the subject passes 6 visuo spatial tests to judge his visuo spatial abilities.

All of these tests will be made during an unique visit of 1h30.

Experimental: Dyslexics with normal visual attention span

Visual attention span : the subject see a 5 letters strings during 200 ms and he has to report it orally whatever the order Visual search : the subject has to find a target among distractors (24 or 48) in different conditions of stimuli (conjunction feature or separable feature) and different conditions of view (full view or reduced view with the moving window paradigm) Elementary visuo spatial perception: the subject passes 6 visuo spatial tests to judge his visuo spatial abilities.

All of these tests will be made during an unique visit of 1h30.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respond time in visual search in different condition of view (full view or reduced view) with separable feature.
Time Frame: Day 0
The subject will have to find a target among distractors, when he will find it, he will have to push a button and we will have his respond time. We will compare the respond time in two view condition: the participant will see all the visual scene or he will have reduced visible window so he won't see all the scene, the periphery will be hide and he will have to move his sight to show it.
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
respond time in function of the distractors' number
Time Frame: Day 0
The subject will have to find a target among distractors, when he will find it, he will have to push a button and we will collect his respond time. We compare the respond time between two number of distractors (24 or 48)
Day 0
visual exploration of the scene
Time Frame: Day 0
with an eye tracker the investigator will analyze the ocular movements during visual search (saccades and fixations) and the equip will compare the visual behavior between the different groups and the different conditions.
Day 0
visuo-spatial perception
Time Frame: Day 0
the investigator will test with different exercises the elementary visuo spatial perception of the participant and he will compare between groups and also he will make correlation with the respond time in visual search.
Day 0
visual attention span (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 0
the subject have to report orally a 5 letters' string presented during 200 ms, the investigator could see if a correlation exist between VAS and RT, VAS and visual exploration, VAS and visuo spatial perception.
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laure PISELLA, PhD, INSERM U1028 - Impact - CRNL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 21, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 21, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 69HCL17_0333
  • 2017-A02525-48 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyslexia

Clinical Trials on Passing tests in dyslexics with reduced eva

Search Similar Trials