ANCHORS Study: UH2 Project (ANCHORS)

June 17, 2024 updated by: University of Florida

Advancing New Computer-based Health Outcomes Regarding Sexual Behavior(ANCHORS) Study: UH2 Project

According to the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, men who have sex with men (MSM), young adults, Black and Latino men and people in the Southern U.S. are at highest HIV risk and should be targeted with cost-effective, scalable interventions. The study team propose a synergistic mobile intervention to reduce alcohol and HIV risk in young adult MSM that combines 3 efficacious approaches.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

New prevention efforts must address alcohol and HIV and be directed to the highest-risk groups. While interventions have targeted MSM, few have targeted young MSM specifically. Young people and MSM bring particular challenges. Thus, it is important that prevention be targeted to them and developed with their input. To that end, the goal of this project is to lay the groundwork for a synergistic, mobile intervention to reduce alcohol use and risky sex and prevent HIV among young adult MSM. This research study is made up of three related sub-projects: 1) a web-based survey; 2) a series of focus groups and 3) a small, preliminary acceptability and usability to study to test the mobile intervention. The proposed intervention to be tested on a preliminary basis in this study combines brief motivational intervention with daily interactive voice response (IVR) monitoring including personalized feedback. Ultimately, this combined intervention will also include pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), however there will be no medication in this particular study. Each of these components has efficacy in enhancing treatment adherence, reducing alcohol and/or HIV risk but requires other interventions to maximize its potential benefit. Combining them will capitalize on the strength of each, leading to a higher impact alcohol and HIV preventive intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
673

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Web-survey:

  • Male sex
  • Ages 18-30
  • Ability to read and write English
  • 1 or more instances of sexual activity with another man in the past 3 months
  • HIV Negative

Focus group:

  • 18-35
  • All other inclusion criteria will be the same as the web survey

Usability phase:

  • 5 or more drinks in a day in the past month
  • Past-month intercourse with another man without a condom
  • Willingness to try PrEP, but have never tried it before

Exclusion Criteria:

Web Screen:

- No subject may have lifetime use of PrEP

Focus group:

  • A current undergraduate or graduate student at any level in one of the 3 departments that make up the College of Health and Human Performance (HHP) at the University of Florida (UF), where Dr. Leeman's faculty appointment is.
  • Do not want to engage in open discussion regarding substance use or sexual activity/orientation in a group setting. It will be possible for participants to contribute to focus group discussions without providing detailed information about their own substance use or sexual activity, however focus group participants must have a degree of openness to discussing these topics with others. These groups will take place with 6-7 other people and some people may be made uncomfortable by the discussions that may take place with regard to participants' drinking, substance use or sexual behavior.
  • Not willing to be recorded via an electronic recording device

Usability phase:

  • No subject may have lifetime use of PrEP
  • Those who do not wish to provide a reliable phone number will be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Survey group
Collect alcohol and sexual activity data via web survey from 683 young MSM to yield normative data for the alcohol and HIV preventive intervention in a follow-up study
Other: Survey
Respondents meeting inclusion criteria will be informed they were selected for the longer survey and continue to the survey. Upon completion, the survey will generate a study identification (ID) that respondents will provide to study staff with additional contact information via phone, text or email to be compensated
Active Comparator: Focus Group
30 young MSM who drink regularly to inform the content of the alcohol and HIV preventive intervention tested in the UH3 phase and ensure the intervention is culturally appropriate for MSM.
Other: Survey
Respondents meeting inclusion criteria will be informed they were selected for the longer survey and continue to the survey. Upon completion, the survey will generate a study identification (ID) that respondents will provide to study staff with additional contact information via phone, text or email to be compensated
Other: Focus Group
After informed consent, participants will complete the web-based intervention component in development. Afterward, participants will be engaged by an experienced facilitator in a discussion of aspects of the intervention they liked and disliked and suggestions they have for enhancing its cultural appropriateness to young MSM.
Active Comparator: Usability Study
10 young adult MSM will test the mobile intervention in development for 30 days in order to establish usability, acceptability and correct any functionality issues.
Other: Survey
Respondents meeting inclusion criteria will be informed they were selected for the longer survey and continue to the survey. Upon completion, the survey will generate a study identification (ID) that respondents will provide to study staff with additional contact information via phone, text or email to be compensated
Other: Usability study
After informed consent, participants will utilize the mobile intervention in development for 30 days to establish usability, acceptability and correct any functionality issues.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantity of Alcohol Consumption
Time Frame: Retrospective self-report over the past month
Determine levels of alcohol consumption in study population
Retrospective self-report over the past month
High-risk Sexual Behavior: Condomless Sex
Time Frame: Retrospective self-report from past month on web survey
Past month frequency of condomless sex
Retrospective self-report from past month on web survey
Study Participant Opinions on Acceptability of Intervention Content
Time Frame: Up to one month

Participants in the usability study will report on the acceptability of the interactive voice response (IVR) system and the personalized feedback produced based on their IVR responses.

On a modified System Usability Scale, participants in the usability study will report on the acceptability (i.e., perceived value, liking) of the interactive voice response (IVR) system and the personalized feedback produced based on their IVR responses. Items were rated on a 1-7 scale with higher scores indicating greater usability. The acceptability subscale is made up of 5 items. The score reported below is the mean of these five items.
Up to one month
Study Participant Opinions on Usability of Intervention Content
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
On a modified System Usability Scale, participants in the usability study will report on the usability of the interactive voice response (IVR) system and the personalized feedback produced based on their IVR responses. Items were rated on a 1-7 scale with higher scores indicating greater usability. The usability subscale is made up of 4 items. The score reported below is the mean of these four items.
Up to 1 month
High-risk Sexual Behavior: Sexual Activity During/After Alcohol Use
Time Frame: Past month on a self-report survey
Past month frequency of alcohol use before or during oral, anal and/or vaginal sex
Past month on a self-report survey

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Leeman, PhD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 19, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB201701367 N
  • UH2AA026214-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on Survey

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings